SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Prospects with high chance of busting from each team

Créé par: Cdn_bacon
Équipe: 2020-21 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 14 janv. 2021
Publié: 14 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
311 $26 902 459 $0 $13 382 500 $-26 902 458 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Stars de Dallas
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 5
Logo de Predators de Nashville
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
894 167 $894 167 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
760 000 $760 000 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
894 167 $894 167 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
874 125 $874 125 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance375 000 $$375K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
894 167 $894 167 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance710 000 $$710K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
825 833 $825 833 $
C
RFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
894 167 $894 167 $
AG, C
RFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 janv. 2021 à 14 h 45
#26
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: A_Habs_fan
So why was i quoted ?


Sorry lol, I was gonna respond to your comment to include studnicka as a guy who obviously wont bust

my b
A_Habs_fan a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2021 à 14 h 47
#27
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 3,553
Mentions "j'aime": 610
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lmao guys wtf is the deal here. Propeller is 100% correct and mhockey has no clue whats going on

Studnicka was a 2nd rounder, if he is even a 3rd or 2nd line guy he wont be a Bust so @Cdn_bacon take Studnicka off of this list and put Senyshyn on 9obviously
Also Studnicka is literally projected to be a top 6 center (by like 99% of hockey websites) so yeah 1st or 2nd line is correct, NOT 2nd or 3rd like mhockey said

Why do these arguments happen, Im glad I can be here at least to dispel the argument and just point out once and for all who is right here

Again an opinion is an opinion as Propeller said, but no need to be rude about it or try to say someone else is wrong lmao mhockey


No lol
14 janv. 2021 à 14 h 49
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,955
Mentions "j'aime": 7,725
Bouchard? I don't see how he has a high chance of being a bust. He's a sure-fire NHLer who will put up points, the only question is at what level will he be able to defend.
14 janv. 2021 à 14 h 51
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,955
Mentions "j'aime": 7,725
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lmao guys wtf is the deal here. Propeller is 100% correct and mhockey has no clue whats going on

Studnicka was a 2nd rounder, if he is even a 3rd or 2nd line guy he wont be a Bust so @Cdn_bacon take Studnicka off of this list and put Senyshyn on 9obviously
Also Studnicka is literally projected to be a top 6 center (by like 99% of hockey websites) so yeah 1st or 2nd line is correct, NOT 2nd or 3rd like mhockey said

Why do these arguments happen, Im glad I can be here at least to dispel the argument and just point out once and for all who is right here

Again an opinion is an opinion as Propeller said, but no need to be rude about it or try to say someone else is wrong lmao mhockey


tears of joy
UpsideDownQue a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2021 à 14 h 53
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lmao guys wtf is the deal here. Propeller is 100% correct and mhockey has no clue whats going on

Studnicka was a 2nd rounder, if he is even a 3rd or 2nd line guy he wont be a Bust so @Cdn_bacon take Studnicka off of this list and put Senyshyn on 9obviously
Also Studnicka is literally projected to be a top 6 center (by like 99% of hockey websites) so yeah 1st or 2nd line is correct, NOT 2nd or 3rd like mhockey said

Why do these arguments happen, Im glad I can be here at least to dispel the argument and just point out once and for all who is right here

Again an opinion is an opinion as Propeller said, but no need to be rude about it or try to say someone else is wrong lmao mhockey



How on earth was I wrong? He literally said Studnika’s “floor”, is a prime keslar. Maybe you forgot how good prime kesler was but that’s a guy scoring 30+ goals with ease and constantly being in the running for the Selke (and winning it once). Don’t you think that’s a little ridiculous? He projects to be a middle 6 centre, not a 1C pal. No one pegs him as a 1C other than homers like you. You didn’t dispel any argument. You’re just continuing this delusion that Studinka is better than he actually is. He’s a good prospect, and if he develops into a 2C or even a 3C that’s a huge success for Boston. Could he become a future 1C? Sure it’s possible but that’s definitely not his projection at the moment. If he ends up being a 50 ish point two way centre bruins fans are going to be VERY VERY happy.
vr1995 a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2021 à 14 h 54
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: CD282
tears of joy


This guys such a homer. No one is projecting studnika to be a legit 1C. Maybe on Boston because their C prospects are so bad and they have nobody to replace Bergeron, but it’s highly unlikely he’s a legitimate 1C on a cup contending team
CD282 a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2021 à 15 h 51
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,955
Mentions "j'aime": 7,725
Quoting: mhockey91
This guys such a homer. No one is projecting studnika to be a legit 1C. Maybe on Boston because their C prospects are so bad and they have nobody to replace Bergeron, but it’s highly unlikely he’s a legitimate 1C on a cup contending team


I know next to nothing about the prospect in question, but he's 22 next month and has played a grand total of 2 NHL games. Not many top-6 center prospects are in the minors at 21/22 - especially when depth on the big club isn't blocking them. (FYI: he's currently on their taxi squad as far as I can tell.)
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2021 à 15 h 53
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: CD282
I know next to nothing about the prospect in question, but he's 22 next month and has played a grand total of 2 NHL games. Not many top-6 center prospects are in the minors at 21/22 - especially when depth on the big club isn't blocking them. (FYI: he's currently on their taxi squad as far as I can tell.)


I think it’s possible he could become a good 2C, but there is a big difference between a 2C and a 1C. I still think my favourite comment is that his FLOOR is a PRIME keslar. That made my day
CD282 a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2021 à 20 h 9
#34
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: Cdn_bacon
No lol


Quoting: CD282
tears of joy


Quoting: mhockey91
How on earth was I wrong? He literally said Studnika’s “floor”, is a prime keslar. Maybe you forgot how good prime kesler was but that’s a guy scoring 30+ goals with ease and constantly being in the running for the Selke (and winning it once). Don’t you think that’s a little ridiculous? He projects to be a middle 6 centre, not a 1C pal. No one pegs him as a 1C other than homers like you. You didn’t dispel any argument. You’re just continuing this delusion that Studinka is better than he actually is. He’s a good prospect, and if he develops into a 2C or even a 3C that’s a huge success for Boston. Could he become a future 1C? Sure it’s possible but that’s definitely not his projection at the moment. If he ends up being a 50 ish point two way centre bruins fans are going to be VERY VERY happy.


Lmao of course thats not his floor, but the overall gist that Studnicka might be a bust is completely wrong. Just learn a little hocjkey and you will know that. Its like saying Jack Hughes is a bust cuz he was bad last year.
Not gonna keep arguing tho, either acknowledge that im right or just be ignorant and biased against the bruins on your own time. I dont care
14 janv. 2021 à 20 h 38
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lmao of course thats not his floor, but the overall gist that Studnicka might be a bust is completely wrong. Just learn a little hocjkey and you will know that. Its like saying Jack Hughes is a bust cuz he was bad last year.
Not gonna keep arguing tho, either acknowledge that im right or just be ignorant and biased against the bruins on your own time. I dont care


I never once said he was gonna be a bust, so I’m not acknowledging you’re right. I say he’s gonna be a 2C / 3C. Depends how he develops. He’s probably not gonna be this hidden gem 1C. Sure it’s possible, but it’s unlikely and not his projection. Right now he projects to be a solid 2C, I agree with that.
15 janv. 2021 à 13 h 25
#36
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: mhockey91
I never once said he was gonna be a bust, so I’m not acknowledging you’re right. I say he’s gonna be a 2C / 3C. Depends how he develops. He’s probably not gonna be this hidden gem 1C. Sure it’s possible, but it’s unlikely and not his projection. Right now he projects to be a solid 2C, I agree with that.


Exactly. The only point me and propeller made was that Studnicka should not be on this list. Put Senyshyn here (considering Zboril is currently on the team)...
Thats all! Glad we agree
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage