Way too much for Jones, Not quite enough for Dubois.

Rly, for jones extended and taking back Neal? Maybe a bit too much but I don’t think it’s far off. Same thing w Dubois, but reversed ig

this team is an interesting one, there cup window small (around 2 years) but man in 2021-2022 they will have the cap space to do some dmg, but than the issue comes in 2022-2023 as they got alot of big contracts to sign and they lose a big player or two.

So going all in for a year is risky but rn its there best chance for a cup

I didn't really take that into account since it's matching salary but yeah maybe that works. I'm not high on Thrun at all. Maybe Comtois (lol) or someone like Lacombe

Not enough!?? Lol

Not high on Thrun. Don't see Steel being more than a top 9 C, Rakell is a fraction of the player, and a 1st. Not hard to diminish the deal.

That’s like saying “I’m not high on Caufield, Tatar is a fraction of a player, don’t see Poheling being more than a top 9c and a 1st “ you can debrief literally any trade with your own opinion.

I think value evaluation is how you determine a trade as being too much or too little.

Edmonton is pretty good at RD right now they won't trade for someone. neal and lagesson are the only expendable pieces in there and they aren't really trading picks. Peter chiarelli would be all over this deal but ken holland doesn't trade prospects till you know what they are.