SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If They Are Good By Deadline

Créé par: Agent_Of_R9
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 12 janv. 2021
Publié: 12 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I don't think the Leafs will do exceptionally well in the Canadian division, but you never know.
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Weegar, MacKenzie (1 000 000 $ retained)
FLA
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Larsson, Johan (700 000 $ retained)
ARI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
3.
WSH
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Simmonds, Wayne
Détails additionnels:
*Traded for cap reasons
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 279 783 $0 $0 $1 220 217 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
0 $0 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
735 000 $735 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 janv. 2021 à 21 h 11
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Modifié 12 janv. 2021 à 21 h 19
Quoting: Ryminister_27
& the analytics on Dermott are clear. He's better than people on this site say he is. If Dubas cared about the handedness he woulda trade Dermott for Weegar already when it was offered. He didn't. Sure handedness could matter a bit to some people, but when the players are arguably equal skill it doesn't


The analytics say Weegar is better than Dermott too. Lets just be perfectly clear about that.

The fact Dubas didn't trade for him more than likely has to do with the fact Weegar didn't have a contract signed and the Leafs had 0 cap space to work with this summer rather than any ridiculous notion that his view on handedness came into play. Weegar signed for 3 mil in the tax friendly state of Flroida. Thats a contract that likely starts with a 4 if signed in Toronto and one the Leafs could never have maneuvered with.

Also wtf is this 'when players are of equal skill handedness doesn't matter'? How does that make any logical sense to you? If they are of equal skill but one is going to have worse results upon switching sides, the one playing on the correct side for his shot is always the better option...not counting contracts.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 21 h 11
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Saskleaf
I agree I don't think he's be a leaf next season, but they aren't giving him away. Weegar is overrated. He is not worth a first, and is not worth a first and Dermott, who is probably worth a second.


I don’t think Weeger is overrated, I think he’s a very solid top 4 guy and the going rate for cost controlled top 4 D is a first round pick+
12 janv. 2021 à 21 h 15
#28
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,179
Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
Quoting: mhockey91
I don’t think Weeger is overrated, I think he’s a very solid top 4 guy and the going rate for cost controlled top 4 D is a first round pick+


Sure, he's a solid top 4 guys, but I just don't think he's worth a first, that's all. Also, I don't understand why he is in 50% of Toronto ACGM's.
12 janv. 2021 à 21 h 15
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Saskleaf
Sure, he's a solid top 4 guys, but I just don't think he's worth a first, that's all. Also, I don't understand why he is in 50% of Toronto ACGM's.


That’s the going rate for a top 4 D whose cost controlled. His contract could be very favourable for years.
12 janv. 2021 à 21 h 21
#30
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,179
Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
Quoting: mhockey91
That’s the going rate for a top 4 D whose cost controlled. His contract could be very favourable for years.


Ok, I don't see Toronto giving up a first for him.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 21 h 34
#31
Démarrer sujet
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: mhockey91
Pens should’ve never moved him


Agree he’s turned into one of the best defensive defencemen in the league while the Pens got nowhere with JJ anchoring the whole team.

Quoting: mhockey91
Okay so let me get this straight... you say Dubas/Keefe don’t care about LS/RS, and you also claim dermott is SO good. Then why on earth couldn’t dermott pass ceci on the depth chart and be played with rielly? Oh wait I have answer... that’s because in reality he really isn’t that good...

Weeger may have only had one good year sure, but that’s still one more than what dermott has had. I’ve heard “dermott top 4D” for years now yet he still hasn’t made that progression


IIRC, there was maybe a 10 game stretch in which Dermott saw top 4 role when Rielly & muzzin we’re both injured. Ian Tulloch reported that even though his results regressed, they were still passable.

I have no idea why Dermott didn’t play over Ceci. Maybe Keefe dislikes him. But that’s even more reason to why they should’ve dealt him in that package for Weegar. It looks like a missed opportunity now that he can’t even crack the lineup.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 21 h 36
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Saskleaf
Ok, I don't see Toronto giving up a first for him.


Fair enough
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 23 h 31
#33
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: mhockey91
Okay so let me get this straight... you say Dubas/Keefe don’t care about LS/RS, and you also claim dermott is SO good. Then why on earth couldn’t dermott pass ceci on the depth chart and be played with rielly? Oh wait I have answer... that’s because in reality he really isn’t that good...

Weeger may have only had one good year sure, but that’s still one more than what dermott has had. I’ve heard “dermott top 4D” for years now yet he still hasn’t made that progression


I never said he was SO good. I just said that all the overhype on Weegar doesn't make him better. You mean how Ceci started there under Babcock? Then got injured pretty soon after Keefe took over? That Ceci? ... it's called experience. Babcock already had Ceci with Rielly so the communication was there. Dermott had the chemistry with Holl. Don't see how that's a hard concept to grasp.

If you don't think they care about it, sure think what you want. But I mean the evidence is there. The majority of the d-man they signed were left handed that can play the right side. They had the opportunity to move Dermott for Weegar already and turned in down. So I mean sure, honk they believe something totally opposite of what they've been doing
12 janv. 2021 à 23 h 34
#34
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: Byrr
The analytics say Weegar is better than Dermott too. Lets just be perfectly clear about that.

The fact Dubas didn't trade for him more than likely has to do with the fact Weegar didn't have a contract signed and the Leafs had 0 cap space to work with this summer rather than any ridiculous notion that his view on handedness came into play. Weegar signed for 3 mil in the tax friendly state of Flroida. Thats a contract that likely starts with a 4 if signed in Toronto and one the Leafs could never have maneuvered with.

Also wtf is this 'when players are of equal skill handedness doesn't matter'? How does that make any logical sense to you? If they are of equal skill but one is going to have worse results upon switching sides, the one playing on the correct side for his shot is always the better option...not counting contracts.


You mean like Dermott didn't have a contract either a g they wanted Johnsson too which woulda Fred's up the cap space to sign Weegar to what he signed for? ... yeah great logic.
12 janv. 2021 à 23 h 35
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Modifié 12 janv. 2021 à 23 h 42
Quoting: Ryminister_27
You mean like Dermott didn't have a contract either a g they wanted Johnsson too which woulda Fred's up the cap space to sign Weegar to what he signed for? ... yeah great logic.


Dermott they had control of, Weegar had (and filed for if you've forgotten) arb rights. You're also ignoring that a contract in Florida isn't the same as a contract in Toronto. A 3 mil contract in Florida is a 4 mil contract in Toronto. Johnsson alone wasn't enough to free up that space for Weegar. The space wasn't there, and the space definitely wasn't there for a contract that could have ended up larger out of arbitration.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
13 janv. 2021 à 12 h 41
#36
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: Byrr
Dermott they had control of, Weegar had (and filed for if you've forgotten) arb rights. You're also ignoring that a contract in Florida isn't the same as a contract in Toronto. A 3 mil contract in Florida is a 4 mil contract in Toronto. Johnsson alone wasn't enough to free up that space for Weegar. The space wasn't there, and the space definitely wasn't there for a contract that could have ended up larger out of arbitration.


People need to stop with this blah blah tax rate blah blah. 1 guy blows it up and everyone thinks it's a huge deal. What you forget about are 2 bigger factors:
1. Players playing in Canada are paid in US dollars so they actually receive more Canadian dollars.
2. Leafs can dish out bigger signing bonuses than almost (if not all) every other team in the league.

You also forget that Weegar is from Ontario. Maybe he would've loved playing for the Leafs and not cared about the tax difference. So if you're gonna sit there and just use the tax rate as your main point, you better not forget about the Canadian benefits too.

& you're also forgetting (as I said) that the offer Florida wanted was Johnsson AND Dermott. So $3.4M plus $875K is actually over the $4M if Weegar had demanded the tax difference, so again there's enough space.

I'm not gonna sit here and go round for round with you on this. It seems quite clear that if Dubas wanted a right handed guy, he could've had one multiple times. Believe what you want. At the end of the day I really don't care.
13 janv. 2021 à 12 h 57
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Modifié 13 janv. 2021 à 13 h 2
Quoting: Ryminister_27
People need to stop with this blah blah tax rate blah blah. 1 guy blows it up and everyone thinks it's a huge deal. What you forget about are 2 bigger factors:
1. Players playing in Canada are paid in US dollars so they actually receive more Canadian dollars.
2. Leafs can dish out bigger signing bonuses than almost (if not all) every other team in the league.

You also forget that Weegar is from Ontario. Maybe he would've loved playing for the Leafs and not cared about the tax difference. So if you're gonna sit there and just use the tax rate as your main point, you better not forget about the Canadian benefits too.

& you're also forgetting (as I said) that the offer Florida wanted was Johnsson AND Dermott. So $3.4M plus $875K is actually over the $4M if Weegar had demanded the tax difference, so again there's enough space.

I'm not gonna sit here and go round for round with you on this. It seems quite clear that if Dubas wanted a right handed guy, he could've had one multiple times. Believe what you want. At the end of the day I really don't care.


There's dozens upon dozens of examples of players choosing lower tax rate states and taking lower deals to do it. There's 1, singular, example of a player choosing Toronto because of hometown feels and a big signing bonus. If you think that somehow supports your argument .... well ....

You can add Johnsson and Dermott together to get the cap space you if want but you are forgetting that its at the very least a league minimum contract to replace the extra player as well. His 875k isn't going to Weegar, its going to a replacement and seeing as how Johnsson was a top 6 player, that replacement is probably making more than Dermott's 875k(see: Vesey's 900k). You've lost money trying to do this, not gained it.
13 janv. 2021 à 13 h 4
#38
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: Byrr
There's dozens upon dozens of examples of players choosing lower tax rate states and taking lower deals to do it. There's 1, singular, example of a player choosing Toronto because of hometown feels and a big signing bonus. If you think that somehow supports your argument .... well ....

You can add Johnsson and Dermott together to get the cap space you if want but you are forgetting that its at the very least a league minimum contract to replace the extra player as well. His 875k isn't going to Weegar, its going to a replacement and seeing as how Johnsson was a top 6 player, that replacement is probably making more than Dermott's 875k(see: Vesey's 900k). You've lost money trying to do this, not gained it.


Many players have signed with Toronto for various reasons, not just Tavares.

& extra player? What are you talking about? If Dermott and Johnsson for Weegar happened, Weegar replaces Dermott on the bottom pair, and there is no need to replace Johnsson as the guy they traded him for isn't even on the roster. But nice try.
13 janv. 2021 à 13 h 6
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Many players have signed with Toronto for various reasons, not just Tavares.

& extra player? What are you talking about? If Dermott and Johnsson for Weegar happened, Weegar replaces Dermott on the bottom pair, and there is no need to replace Johnsson as the guy they traded him for isn't even on the roster. But nice try.


Johnsson was an active player on the Leafs roster. Someone replaces him on the 20 man roster, whether that is Anderson or not. Not replacing Johnsson would be suggesting the Leafs are playing the season with 11 forwards and 6 defensemen on their roster any given night.

When you move a player in your top 20, someone takes him place on the ice every night and that player earns at least the league minimum of $700,000. In other words, moving Johnsson doesn't create $3.4m in room, it creates 2.7m and the replacement players minimum salary. In the case of the Leafs this season, Vesey replaced him for $900,000 making that $3.4m an actual $2.5m.
13 janv. 2021 à 13 h 10
#40
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: Byrr
Johnsson was an active player on the Leafs roster. Someone replaces him on the 20 man roster, whether that is Anderson or not. Not replacing Johnsson would be suggesting the Leafs are playing the season with 11 forwards and 6 defensemen on their roster any given night.

When you move a player in your top 20, someone takes him place on the ice every night and that player earns at least the league minimum of $700,000.


🤦🏻‍♂️

What you don't see is that the Leafs already replaced Johnsson with guys like Vesey, Thornton, Simmonds, Barabanov, etc. Guys that they already signed and a trade of Johnsson wouldn't have affected that.

Jesus. You make my brain hurt. Sorry, I'm done with this conversation now.
13 janv. 2021 à 13 h 11
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Quoting: Ryminister_27
🤦🏻‍♂️

What you don't see is that the Leafs already replaced Johnsson with guys like Vesey, Thornton, Simmonds, Barabanov, etc. Guys that they already signed and a trade of Johnsson wouldn't have affected that.

Jesus. You make my brain hurt. Sorry, I'm done with this conversation now.


When the trade of Johnsson and Vesey happened doesn't matter, we are looking at the cap. Moving Johnsson's 3.4m off the cap creates an empty spot in the top 20. He was replaced on the ice by Vesey and his 900k. I'm sorry that basic math makes your brain hurt.
13 janv. 2021 à 13 h 22
#42
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Quoting: Ryminister_27
🤦🏻‍♂️

What you don't see is that the Leafs already replaced Johnsson with guys like Vesey, Thornton, Simmonds, Barabanov, etc. Guys that they already signed and a trade of Johnsson wouldn't have affected that.

Jesus. You make my brain hurt. Sorry, I'm done with this conversation now.


Here, math isn't your strong point so I'll make a visualization for you:

Here are the Leafs lines.

Thornton - Matthews - Marner
Johnsson - Tavares - Nylander
Mikehyev - Kerfoot - Hyman
Simmonds - Spezza - Barabanov

Rielly - Brodie
Muzzin - Holl
Dermott - Bogosian

Vesey (we'll call Vesey the 21st man since you seem to think him being acquired already somehow matters)

Now the Leafs trade Johnsson and Dermott for Weegar, their caps balancing out:

Thornton - Matthews - Marner
[replacement] - Tavares - Nylander
Mikehyev - Kerfoot - Hyman
Simmonds - Spezza - Barabanov

Rielly - Brodie
Muzzin - Holl
Weegar - Bogosian

Vesey


You see, it doesn't matter that Vesey was already acquired. You still have that hole you have to fill. If you use Vesey to do it, you just don't have a 21st man. You could be arguing to do that but playing with only a 20 man roster isn't a risk NHL teams take and the Leafs would have lost Dell by now to do it. It still costs the at minimum $700,000 to replace Johnsson with another skater whether that skater was already acquired or not. Thats the cost you are trying to say doesn't exist.
13 janv. 2021 à 13 h 25
#43
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: Byrr
Here, math isn't your strong point so I'll make a visualization for you:

Here are the Leafs lines.

Thornton - Matthews - Marner
Johnsson - Tavares - Nylander
Mikehyev - Kerfoot - Hyman
Simmonds - Spezza - Barabanov

Rielly - Brodie
Muzzin - Holl
Dermott - Bogosian

Vesey (we'll call Vesey the 21st man since you seem to think him being acquired already somehow matters)

Now the Leafs trade Johnsson and Dermott for Weegar, their caps balancing out:

Thornton - Matthews - Marner
[replacement] - Tavares - Nylander
Mikehyev - Kerfoot - Hyman
Simmonds - Spezza - Barabanov

Rielly - Brodie
Muzzin - Holl
Weegar - Bogosian

Vesey


You see, it doesn't matter that Vesey was already acquired. You still have that hole you have to fill. If you use Vesey to do it, you just don't have a 21st man. You could be arguing to do that but playing with only a 20 man roster isn't a risk NHL teams take. It still costs the at minimum $700,000 to replace Johnsson with another skater whether that skater was already acquired or not.


You literally put Vesey in that spot which is where he is anyways. I don't see how that's hard to comprehend. & he's under $1M so he's easy to fit in the cap.

Goodbye.
13 janv. 2021 à 13 h 26
#44
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Quoting: Ryminister_27
You literally put Vesey in that spot which is where he is anyways. I don't see how that's hard to comprehend. & he's under $1M so he's easy to fit in the cap.

Goodbye.


and to do that, the Leafs don't have a 21 man roster. They are stuck with a 20 man and lose Dell to waivers. You still cost the Leafs that close to league minimum player, it was just the 21st man. Now you are just ignoring that NHL teams dont run 20 man rosters ... ever.
13 janv. 2021 à 13 h 35
#45
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Modifié 13 janv. 2021 à 13 h 42
Quoting: Byrr
and to do that, the Leafs don't have a 21 man roster. They are stuck with a 20 man and lose Dell to waivers. You still cost the Leafs that close to league minimum player, it was just the 21st man. Now you are just ignoring that NHL teams dont run 20 man rosters ... ever.


You don't have to have a 21 man roster. Especially with the taxi squad this season, you'll see a lot of 20 man rosters for cap reason.

They actually wouldn't lose Dell to waivers. As per NHL guidelines for the upcoming seasons, if a team is carrying less than 3 goalies on their active roster, sending a goalie to the taxi squad does not require waivers. Dell would be exempt from waivers if they were to send him down. Thus not causing an issue with the cap or losing a goalie (he probably wouldn't be claimed anyways). It's why they're most likely waiting to send him down.

But since you can't seem to read properly, I'll highlight this part:

I'm not going round for round with you on this anymore. I'm done with this conversation with you. Goodbye.
13 janv. 2021 à 14 h 32
#46
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Quoting: Ryminister_27
You don't have to have a 21 man roster. Especially with the taxi squad this season, you'll see a lot of 20 man rosters for cap reason.


Demonstrably false. Not a single team is running a 20 man roster right now.

Quote:
They actually wouldn't lose Dell to waivers. As per NHL guidelines for the upcoming seasons, if a team is carrying less than 3 goalies on their active roster, sending a goalie to the taxi squad does not require waivers. Dell would be exempt from waivers if they were to send him down. Thus not causing an issue with the cap or losing a goalie (he probably wouldn't be claimed anyways). It's why they're most likely waiting to send him down.


Demonstrably false. Goalies are subject to the same waiver rules as everyone else even though teams are forced to carry 3. Notice how Edmonton's and Winnipeg's 3rd goalies both got claimed off waivers.

Its like you don't pay attention at all.
13 janv. 2021 à 14 h 56
#47
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: Byrr
Demonstrably false. Not a single team is running a 20 man roster right now.

Quote:
They actually wouldn't lose Dell to waivers. As per NHL guidelines for the upcoming seasons, if a team is carrying less than 3 goalies on their active roster, sending a goalie to the taxi squad does not require waivers. Dell would be exempt from waivers if they were to send him down. Thus not causing an issue with the cap or losing a goalie (he probably wouldn't be claimed anyways). It's why they're most likely waiting to send him down.


Demonstrably false. Goalies are subject to the same waiver rules as everyone else even though teams are forced to carry 3. Notice how Edmonton's and Winnipeg's 3rd goalies both got claimed off waivers.

Its like you don't pay attention at all.


It's like you can't read at all.

Goodbye. Stop quoting me.
13 janv. 2021 à 14 h 57
#48
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Modifié 13 janv. 2021 à 15 h 5
Quoting: Ryminister_27
It's like you can't read at all.

Goodbye. Stop quoting me.


I'm just correcting the obviously incorrect things you are trying to pass off, like goalies suddenly don't require waivers even though we just saw 2 get claimed yesterday, for anyone else who might be reading. You're welcome to stop replying whenever you want. No one is forcing you to.
13 janv. 2021 à 23 h 52
#49
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: Byrr
Demonstrably false. Not a single team is running a 20 man roster right now.

Quote:
They actually wouldn't lose Dell to waivers. As per NHL guidelines for the upcoming seasons, if a team is carrying less than 3 goalies on their active roster, sending a goalie to the taxi squad does not require waivers. Dell would be exempt from waivers if they were to send him down. Thus not causing an issue with the cap or losing a goalie (he probably wouldn't be claimed anyways). It's why they're most likely waiting to send him down.


Demonstrably false. Goalies are subject to the same waiver rules as everyone else even though teams are forced to carry 3. Notice how Edmonton's and Winnipeg's 3rd goalies both got claimed off waivers.

Its like you don't pay attention at all.


"To keep healthy players in net to let the games go on, teams must have three goaltenders available among the 29 players on their active roster and taxi squads."

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.tsn.ca/nhl-taxi-squads-to-help-teams-stay-on-ice-during-2020-21-season-1.1575447%3ftsn-amp

Right from TSN. As I said, teams must have at least 3 goalies available between the active roster and taxi squad. If they don't, sending one to the taxi squad does not expose him to waivers.

Toronto currently has Andersen and Campbell on the active roster. Hutchinson is in the minors at Marlies camp (when their season officially starts). So after the AHL season starts in February, Dell can be placed on the taxi squad and not exposed to waivers.
14 janv. 2021 à 0 h 4
#50
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Modifié 14 janv. 2021 à 0 h 21
Quoting: Ryminister_27
"To keep healthy players in net to let the games go on, teams must have three goaltenders available among the 29 players on their active roster and taxi squads."

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.tsn.ca/nhl-taxi-squads-to-help-teams-stay-on-ice-during-2020-21-season-1.1575447%3ftsn-amp

Right from TSN. As I said, teams must have at least 3 goalies available between the active roster and taxi squad. If they don't, sending one to the taxi squad does not expose him to waivers.

Toronto currently has Andersen and Campbell on the active roster. Hutchinson is in the minors at Marlies camp (when their season officially starts). So after the AHL season starts in February, Dell can be placed on the taxi squad and not exposed to waivers.


No where in what you quoted does it say they are exempt from waivers. In fact the only spot where 'waivers' shows up in the article is where it says all players going to the taxi squad must clear them. Teams must have 3 goalies on their rosters but the 3rd goalie is still subject to waivers before going to the taxi squad. We have seen evidence of this when Edmonton lost Forsberg to Carolina and Winnipeg lost Comrie to New Jersey. We have 2 actual examples from a few days ago of what you are saying not being true. Dell is subject to the exact same waivers Forsberg and Comrie were exposed to and doesn't stand a chance of make it through them, hence Toronto leaving him on their NHL roster for now.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage