SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Habs wanted to lose Juulsen

Créé par: MacAttacks
Équipe: 2020-21 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 12 janv. 2021
Publié: 12 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Habs could of kept Juulsen, they had the cap space...
So, was/is bringing total contracts to 47/50 the hidden reason ?
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $74 066 309 $0 $3 137 500 $7 433 691 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
735 000 $735 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $ (325 000 $$325K325 000 $$325K)
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
737 500 $737 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 janv. 2021 à 14 h 47
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,427
For tradition's sake?
12 janv. 2021 à 14 h 50
#2
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
I mean, I certainly think he's an OK asset, but having this space will allow them to potentially add at the deadline without any wild & wacky roster moves.
12 janv. 2021 à 14 h 51
#3
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,657
Mentions "j'aime": 10,233
We didn't keep Juulsen on the NHL roster because he needs to play games. He's not going to develop by sitting on the bench.
jpsnow13 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 14 h 52
#4
HABS for LIFE
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 150
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Unfortunately he one of those guys who prone to injuries. Maybe if wasn’t picked up on waivers they could of got a late round draft pick.
12 janv. 2021 à 15 h 9
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 41
Mentions "j'aime": 5
They knew there was a chance he could get claimed. Between losing him for nothing or developing him with the big club, the choice is obvious...

They must think he will not make it as an NHLer. If he does have an NHL career, this will be another first round pick "gaffe" by the GM...
12 janv. 2021 à 15 h 12
#6
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,657
Mentions "j'aime": 10,233
Quoting: MacAttacks
They knew there was a chance he could get claimed. Between losing him for nothing or developing him with the big club, the choice is obvious...

They must think he will not make it as an NHLer. If he does have an NHL career, this will be another first round pick "gaffe" by the GM...


He needs to play games in the AHL. He's barely played in 2 years and isn't going to get better by sitting on the bench. It's that simple.
MacAttacks a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 15 h 15
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 41
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
He needs to play games in the AHL. He's barely played in 2 years and isn't going to get better by sitting on the bench. It's that simple.


I hear you, I am just saying that their decision outcomed to the habs losing him... Are the habs a better team without him as an eventual asset ?
12 janv. 2021 à 15 h 17
#8
You know nothing JS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,998
Mentions "j'aime": 4,395
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
We didn't keep Juulsen on the NHL roster because he needs to play games. He's not going to develop by sitting on the bench.


Adding to this^

Putting him on waivers now was the best timing to improve his chances to go through unclaimed. Teams on full roster, caps maxed out, low number of injuries and the longest list of waived players ever...

If the scout who worked to draft him for Montreal wasn't working for FLA now, he wouldn’t have been claimed...

Keeping him on the bench for some games and sending him down to the AHL later would had been even more risky.
KSIxSKULLS a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 15 h 20
#9
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,657
Mentions "j'aime": 10,233
Quoting: MacAttacks
I hear you, I am just saying that their decision outcomed to the habs losing him... Are the habs a better team without him as an eventual asset ?


Because of his injuries in the past 2 years, he's not really worth anything so it's not like Montreal lost a valuable asset. Our NHL team is not worse off without him, but our AHL team definitely is.
12 janv. 2021 à 15 h 24
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 41
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: jpsnow13
Adding to this^

Putting him on waivers now was the best timing to improve his chances to go through unclaimed. Teams on full roster, caps maxed out, low number of injuries and the longest list of waived players ever...

If the scout who worked to draft him for Montreal wasn't working for FLA now, he wouldn’t have been claimed...

Keeping him on the bench for some games and sending him down to the AHL later would had been even more risky.


I guess it all comes down to that famous "taking a chance"... Hindsight is 20/20 right?

But still, Bergevin has a huge team with him to prevent him from making these sort of "errors".

I just have a hard time understanding why they thought losing him for nothing was better than keeping him with the club.

The amount of work and developpement invested in him for the last 5.5 years has all just gone up in smoke !
12 janv. 2021 à 15 h 27
#11
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,657
Mentions "j'aime": 10,233
Quoting: MacAttacks
I guess it all comes down to that famous "taking a chance"... Hindsight is 20/20 right?

But still, Bergevin has a huge team with him to prevent him from making these sort of "errors".

I just have a hard time understanding why they thought losing him for nothing was better than keeping him with the club.

The amount of work and developpement invested in him for the last 5.5 years has all just gone up in smoke !


It's very simple. Juulsen is not going to develop sitting on the bench. It's just a waste of a contract spot if he's not playing games as he's been away for nearly 2 years.
MacAttacks et jpsnow13 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 22 h 9
#12
You know nothing JS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,998
Mentions "j'aime": 4,395
Quoting: MacAttacks
I guess it all comes down to that famous "taking a chance"... Hindsight is 20/20 right?

But still, Bergevin has a huge team with him to prevent him from making these sort of "errors".

I just have a hard time understanding why they thought losing him for nothing was better than keeping him with the club.

The amount of work and developpement invested in him for the last 5.5 years has all just gone up in smoke !


I don’t know why you cant understand Juulsen needed to be sent down to play after 2 years being injured. Keeping him in Montreal eating popcorn in the stands wouldn't have helped his development.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage