SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Replacing Kane

Créé par: Pond_Duck
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 12 janv. 2021
Publié: 12 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
2700 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
ANA
  1. Kane, Evander
Détails additionnels:
Terminate the contract
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $69 028 333 $0 $577 500 $12 471 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
836 667 $836 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 36
#1
Jeuck75
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,076
Mentions "j'aime": 1,600
Sharks trade 1st and miss out on a top end player....AGAIN!!!!
Pond_Duck, Stgstg55, Nhl_oilers and 3 others a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 37
#2
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,403
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
CGY isn’t trading their most complete player let alone just for a 1st.
Jeuck75, Pond_Duck, GenXHockey and 3 others a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,089
What is the plan with Kane this season?
Jeuck75 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 37
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,431
Mentions "j'aime": 852
Quoting: Jeuck75
Sharks trade 1st and miss out on a top end player....AGAIN!!!!

Lol, some things just never change, they probably still think they are a cup contender
Jeuck75 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 38
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,431
Mentions "j'aime": 852
Quoting: villenash
What is the plan with Kane this season?

I’ve heard they may terminate his contract but I’m not really sure
villenash, Jeuck75 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 39
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,089
Quoting: Pond_Duck
I’ve heard they may terminate his contract but I’m not really sure


I didn't realize it was being taken that far... would be absolutely bonkers.
Pond_Duck et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 39
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
lindholm isn't for sale and if he was it would cost 3 or 4 times that much
Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 39
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,864
Mentions "j'aime": 4,120
Quoting: Jeuck75
Sharks trade 1st and miss out on a top end player....AGAIN!!!!



Hahaha! I would laugh if it was first OA!
Pond_Duck, Jeuck75, OldNYIfan and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 40
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,431
Mentions "j'aime": 852
Quoting: Alfie11
lindholm isn't for sale and if he was it would cost 3 or 4 times that much

Lindholm is probably not worth 4 times more that a first, that seems like a bit much.
Jeuck75 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 40
#10
Jeuck75
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,076
Mentions "j'aime": 1,600
Quoting: Alfie11
lindholm isn't for sale and if he was it would cost 3 or 4 times that much


That pick could become 1st Overall
Pond_Duck, villenash, SpaghettiPasta and 2 others a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 42
#11
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Hahaha! I would laugh if it was first OA!


Quoting: Alfie11
lindholm isn't for sale and if he was it would cost 3 or 4 times that much


Quoting: villenash
I didn't realize it was being taken that far... would be absolutely bonkers.


Quoting: Pond_Duck
I’ve heard they may terminate his contract but I’m not really sure


Quoting: Pond_Duck
Lol, some things just never change, they probably still think they are a cup contender


Quoting: villenash
What is the plan with Kane this season?


Quoting: villenash
What is the plan with Kane this season?


Quoting: Jah1722
CGY isn’t trading their most complete player let alone just for a 1st.


Quoting: Jeuck75
Sharks trade 1st and miss out on a top end player....AGAIN!!!!


Kane is playing and Sharks aren’t trading picks (even if Kane wasn’t playing we’d likely take on a bad contract like Johnson or Eriksson to gain assets not lose).

Meier - Couture - Labanc
Leonard - Hertl - Kane

Was our top 6 for practice that’s opening night lines. Kane’s not terminating it would make zero sense - it’s more logical to recoup the money by playing and fix his debt; sell his houses (if plausible) (he’s got at least 3 houses but reported 6 or 7 dependants so he could be paying for families housing and that’s hard a lot of money going out) and downgrade to reduce costs can start there.
villenash, Jeuck75, Pond_Duck and 2 others a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 43
#12
i hope ur hungry now
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 2,411
Mentions "j'aime": 978
Quoting: Pond_Duck
Lindholm is probably not worth 4 times more that a first, that seems like a bit much.


Lindholm is not worth 4 potential first overalls @Alfie11
Pond_Duck et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 44
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,431
Mentions "j'aime": 852
Quoting: SpaghettiPasta
Lindholm is not worth 4 potential first overalls @Alfie11

Exactly
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 46
#14
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,179
Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
Quoting: SpaghettiPasta
Lindholm is not worth 4 potential first overalls @Alfie11


Quoting: Pond_Duck
Exactly


His point is, not a chance that package gets Lindholm. And I fully agree.
Pond_Duck et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 13 h 49
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: villenash
What is the plan with Kane this season?


Quoting: Pond_Duck
I’ve heard they may terminate his contract but I’m not really sure


Quoting: yikes
Kane is playing and Sharks aren’t trading picks.

Meier - Couture - Labanc
Leonard - Hertl - Kane

Was our top 6 for practice that’s opening night lines. Kane’s not terminating it would make zero sense - it’s more logical to recoup the money by playing and fix his debt; sell his houses (if plausible) (he’s got at least 3 houses but reported 6 or 7 dependants so he could be paying for families housing and that’s hard a lot of money going out) and downgrade to reduce costs can start there.


Kane filed for bankruptcy and has stated he may sit out this season due to concerns a of COVID and his new born baby.

Kane's debt is reportedly just over $26M and his asset values are just over $10M. But if he plays this season he debtors may collect his salary as part of garnishing his wages to repay debt. So as part of his bankruptcy plan, he may sit out so they can't do that. San Jose then has the option to terminate his contract for failing to report to the team.

So yes, it is very likely that he doesn't play.


But on the bright side, if San Jose terminates his contract, he can finally kick the shiit outta Jake Paul in boxing 🤷🏻‍♂️
Pond_Duck, Saskleaf et villenash a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 14 h 1
#16
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
oh ya great idea, lets just throw away our top 5 pick again.
Pond_Duck et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 14 h 7
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Modifié 12 janv. 2021 à 14 h 17
Quoting: Klara
oh ya great idea, lets just throw away our top 5 pick again.


Lindholm not worth a top 5 pick? News to me, Flames dont touch this
Pond_Duck a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 14 h 9
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,098
Mentions "j'aime": 1,688
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Kane filed for bankruptcy and has stated he may sit out this season due to concerns a of COVID and his new born baby.

Kane's debt is reportedly just over $26M and his asset values are just over $10M. But if he plays this season he debtors may collect his salary as part of garnishing his wages to repay debt. So as part of his bankruptcy plan, he may sit out so they can't do that. San Jose then has the option to terminate his contract for failing to report to the team.

So yes, it is very likely that he doesn't play.


But on the bright side, if San Jose terminates his contract, he can finally kick the shiit outta Jake Paul in boxing 🤷🏻‍♂️


I read that they can carry the year over (if they’d want to) similar to that Yashin situation. I have an odd feeling he’s prefer that then collect an 82 game salary instead of 56 game for his contract. If that’s what went through his head.
12 janv. 2021 à 14 h 51
#19
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Lindholm not worth a top 5 pick? News to me, Flames dont touch this


regardless, SJ is not going to trade another top 5 pick. SJ burns the trade.
yikes a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2021 à 18 h 3
#20
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Lindholm not worth a top 5 pick? News to me, Flames dont touch this


That’s not the point lol. Both teams are allowed declining. Sharks can have as little interest as the you would - a deal requires two parties to accept therefore both parties can also decline.

Lindholm is > than a first but the sharks don’t need to trade away a lottery pick so the gain of Lindholm isn’t worth it if they still suck (which Kane/ Lindholm wouldn’t change the whole team if the issue stems from goaltending/ d)
12 janv. 2021 à 23 h 55
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: yikes
That’s not the point lol. Both teams are allowed declining. Sharks can have as little interest as the you would - a deal requires two parties to accept therefore both parties can also decline.

Lindholm is > than a first but the sharks don’t need to trade away a lottery pick so the gain of Lindholm isn’t worth it if they still suck (which Kane/ Lindholm wouldn’t change the whole team if the issue stems from goaltending/ d)


I agree that both teams should decline
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage