SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hawks Should Claim Johnson

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 11 janv. 2021
Publié: 11 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Play him in the top 6 then deal him with retention for assets at the TDL. Hawks could retain to make his contract appealing, and his numbers should be good playing in the top 6 and PP, possibly even along side Kane at some point. He could play center or fill the massive void at RW behind Kane
Transactions
TBL
    waivers
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $65 120 481 $1 090 244 $2 715 000 $16 379 519 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    562 500 $562 500 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    850 000 $850 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    880 833 $880 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    11 janv. 2021 à 13 h 52
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 15,921
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
    I agree
    11 janv. 2021 à 13 h 52
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 1,780
    Mentions "j'aime": 610
    Yeah go for it
    11 janv. 2021 à 13 h 53
    #3
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,164
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,485
    I wouldn't do it tbh. Let him still be on the books as Tampa gets desperate once again next offseason. No one should take that risky contract for free.
    SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
    11 janv. 2021 à 13 h 54
    #4
    Jetsfan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2017
    Messages: 7,983
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,589
    He has 4 more years...thats too much for CHI if they retain imo
    ChiHawk et babouie a aimé ceci.
    11 janv. 2021 à 13 h 55
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 5,603
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,706
    Do you really wanna retain salary on johnson for 4 seasons? If his contract was a couple years shorter this would be a great idea.
    ChiHawk et babouie a aimé ceci.
    11 janv. 2021 à 13 h 56
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    and what happens if Toews isnt out for the full year, thats going to be a mid season major cap maneuver to active him off the LTIR, and as soon as hes healthy he has to be activated you cant wait and keep him on there
    11 janv. 2021 à 14 h 4
    #7
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 33,693
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,869
    Chicago would be smarter in claiming Derek Ryan.

    He has 1 year left, can play 3c and they can get value for him at the deadline by retaining half his salary
    ChiHawk, Wadejos123 et babouie a aimé ceci.
    11 janv. 2021 à 14 h 6
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 1,780
    Mentions "j'aime": 610
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    I wouldn't do it tbh. Let him still be on the books as Tampa gets desperate once again next offseason. No one should take that risky contract for free.

    Do you really think Julian Breasbois isn’t going to figure something out the lightning have the best management team in the league and they’re constantly going to conference finals for a reason
    11 janv. 2021 à 14 h 55
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,269
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
    Quoting: SociallyHawkward
    Do you really wanna retain salary on johnson for 4 seasons? If his contract was a couple years shorter this would be a great idea.


    The way I see there's not gonna be much use for the money during the rebuild anyways. If we could gather a 2nd rounder for its it definetly worth it imo. You could even run the lines as:
    Kubalik-Johnson-Kane
    Debrincat-Strome-Shaw

    which would almost guarentee johnson puts up big point totals
    Bigboi69 a aimé ceci.
    11 janv. 2021 à 14 h 55
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,269
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
    Quoting: aadoyle
    Chicago would be smarter in claiming Derek Ryan.

    He has 1 year left, can play 3c and they can get value for him at the deadline by retaining half his salary


    smart idea but the hawks already have a bunch of centers, What jpohnson brings is the ability to play RW
    11 janv. 2021 à 15 h 1
    #11
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    Quoting: aadoyle
    Chicago would be smarter in claiming Derek Ryan.

    He has 1 year left, can play 3c and they can get value for him at the deadline by retaining half his salary


    HE GOT WAIVED?????
    11 janv. 2021 à 15 h 2
    #12
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    I wouldn't do it tbh. Let him still be on the books as Tampa gets desperate once again next offseason. No one should take that risky contract for free.


    Hes going to seattle soon anyway
    11 janv. 2021 à 15 h 4
    #13
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,164
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,485
    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    Hes going to seattle soon anyway


    Even for Seattle it'd be bad to pick him without getting a +
    11 janv. 2021 à 15 h 11
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 509
    Mentions "j'aime": 228
    hawks need to suck to get better draft picks.
    they don't need guys that will "help" them finish outside of the top 10 draft spots
    babouie a aimé ceci.
    11 janv. 2021 à 15 h 21
    #15
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 33,693
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,869
    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    HE GOT WAIVED?????


    yep, there were some notable names who were waived today

    Perry, Jura, Ryan, Holden, Kylington and others

    Montreal fans going ape**** on waiving perry saying Bergevin should have paid to move Byron
    11 janv. 2021 à 15 h 40
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 351
    Mentions "j'aime": 55
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    The way I see there's not gonna be much use for the money during the rebuild anyways. If we could gather a 2nd rounder for its it definetly worth it imo. You could even run the lines as:
    Kubalik-Johnson-Kane
    Debrincat-Strome-Shaw

    which would almost guarentee johnson puts up big point totals


    It's 4 years at $5M for Johnson's 30-34 age seasons. He's not that 72pt player one might remember from the 2015 SCF anymore. I don't view it as a flip at the deadline contract due to term since there'd be 3 more years left, even if they retain salary.

    Besides, prior to Kucherov's surgery, rumor was TBL was shopping Johnson around offering a sweetener in the trade.
    SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
    11 janv. 2021 à 17 h 9
    #17
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    Quoting: aadoyle
    yep, there were some notable names who were waived today

    Perry, Jura, Ryan, Holden, Kylington and others

    Montreal fans going ape**** on waiving perry saying Bergevin should have paid to move Byron


    Jura?
    11 janv. 2021 à 17 h 11
    #18
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 33,693
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,869
    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    Jura?


    some oilers fans call him that to simplify it but yes JUJHAR KHAIRA got waived. Poor guy looked good in playin but guess Edmonton has other plans
    11 janv. 2021 à 17 h 12
    #19
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    Quoting: aadoyle
    some oilers fans call him that to simplify it but yes JUJHAR KHAIRA got waived. Poor guy looked good in playin but guess Edmonton has other plans


    I was just asking about the name, but im not suprised about the waive, hes pretty expensive for a plug
    12 janv. 2021 à 9 h 45
    #20
    Boi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 1,947
    Mentions "j'aime": 379
    Quoting: RamonDaze
    It's 4 years at $5M for Johnson's 30-34 age seasons. He's not that 72pt player one might remember from the 2015 SCF anymore. I don't view it as a flip at the deadline contract due to term since there'd be 3 more years left, even if they retain salary.

    Besides, prior to Kucherov's surgery, rumor was TBL was shopping Johnson around offering a sweetener in the trade.


    Ya for his full contract if you retain half he’s still a 40’point guy at 2.5 mil that’s pretty good
    Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
    12 janv. 2021 à 12 h 34
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 351
    Mentions "j'aime": 55
    Quoting: Bigboi69
    Ya for his full contract if you retain half he’s still a 40’point guy at 2.5 mil that’s pretty good


    I agree, if the Blackhawks had traded for him, with TBL retaining half his salary, that's potentially a great deal and Bowman should have at least thought about it over the summer. I don't want to seem too harsh. He's still a good player.

    If we're talking about the Blackhawks taking on his full salary, then either keeping at $5M per year for all 4 years or flipping him at the TDL and the Blackhawks retain half salary for him to be a 40pt player on another team for 3 more seasons in order to get a late first or a second, neither of those appeal to me, despite him being a good player.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage