SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Waiver claims and Murphy trade

Créé par: AndrewLadd
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 10 janv. 2021
Publié: 10 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
    Waivers
    2.
    NYI
      Waivers
      3.
      CHI
      1. Holl, Justin
      2. Woll, Joseph
      3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2021
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      2022
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      2023
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2381 500 000 $71 854 647 $1 090 244 $5 900 000 $9 645 353 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
      AD
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      950 000 $950 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Islanders de New York
      700 000 $700 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      562 500 $562 500 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      725 000 $725 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DD
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      800 000 $800 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      700 000 $700 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      880 833 $880 833 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      700 000 $700 000 $
      C
      UFA
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
      C, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      AD, AG
      RFA - 1
      Équipe de réserve
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $ (2 175 000 $$2M2 175 000 $$2M)
      AG, C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 12
      #1
      WentWughes
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2016
      Messages: 10,707
      Mentions "j'aime": 10,271
      I don't think it would be best for Juulsen's career to be scratched. If Chicago isn't going to play him then they shouldn't claim him.
      Kotkaniemi15 a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 13
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 1,780
      Mentions "j'aime": 610
      Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
      I don't think it would be best for Juulsen's career to be scratched. If Chicago isn't going to play him then they shouldn't claim him.

      You’re being very generous it would be the absolutely abysmal thing to happen to his career
      KSIxSKULLS et SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 13
      #3
      Démarrer sujet
      Bo Horvat enjoyer
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2019
      Messages: 10,711
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
      Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
      I don't think it would be best for Juulsen's career to be scratched. If Chicago isn't going to play him then they shouldn't claim him.


      They could play him over Holl, or rotate him and Mitchell. Idk if any nhl roster has room for him in the top 6 tho
      OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 15
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2019
      Messages: 6,287
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,035
      I must say when the title said waiver claims and it was a Blackhawks team with Toronto showing up in the deals...I expected it to be a Dell waiver claim. For a Murphy trade, the time has come and gone for that with Toronto. Holl had a great season last year in his first NHL season and will get every opportunity to follow it up. Trading a 1st and Holl+ for Murphy simply doesn't have the value needed anymore for the Leafs.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 15
      #5
      WentWughes
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2016
      Messages: 10,707
      Mentions "j'aime": 10,271
      Quoting: AndrewLadd
      They could play him over Holl, or rotate him and Mitchell. Idk if any nhl roster has room for him in the top 6 tho


      That's why I think it's best for him to clear waivers (my bias). He's not going to become a full time NHLer if he can't play a lot of games.
      Kotkaniemi15 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 17
      #6
      Démarrer sujet
      Bo Horvat enjoyer
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2019
      Messages: 10,711
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
      Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
      That's why I think it's best for him to clear waivers (my bias). He's not going to become a full time NHLer if he can't play a lot of games.


      While that’s prob true I think he gets claimed tbh. Is there room for him in Detroit? J thought of that, that could be a good spot for him
      OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 17
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2016
      Messages: 1,059
      Mentions "j'aime": 353
      You're not getting a first for Murphy. The leafs have no interest in that trade. I would counter with Dermott and a pick but the leafs don't have the cap space
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 17
      #8
      WentWughes
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2016
      Messages: 10,707
      Mentions "j'aime": 10,271
      Quoting: AndrewLadd
      While that’s prob true I think he gets claimed tbh. Is there room for him in Detroit? J thought of that, that could be a good spot for him


      I'm sure there's room on many teams, but I don't think he should be playing in the NHL right now after missing nearly 2 years of hockey.
      AndrewLadd et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 17
      #9
      Démarrer sujet
      Bo Horvat enjoyer
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2019
      Messages: 10,711
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
      Quoting: Byrr
      I must say when the title said waiver claims and it was a Blackhawks team with Toronto showing up in the deals...I expected it to be a Dell waiver claim. For a Murphy trade, the time has come and gone for that with Toronto. Holl had a great season last year in his first NHL season and will get every opportunity to follow it up. Trading a 1st and Holl+ for Murphy simply doesn't have the value needed anymore for the Leafs.

      Tbh idk much ab holl but I see a lot of leafs fans complaining ab him so he was included for cap purposes
      OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 18
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 1,780
      Mentions "j'aime": 610
      Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
      That's why I think it's best for him to clear waivers (my bias). He's not going to become a full time NHLer if he can't play a lot of games.

      Though I’d love to see him splitting time with Foote as Tampa Bays 3rd spot his best situation would be playing every day in the AHL
      AndrewLadd, KSIxSKULLS et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 22
      #11
      LongtimeLeafsufferer
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2015
      Messages: 59,477
      Mentions "j'aime": 22,654
      Makes no sense for the Leafs. Taking on 1.8m in cap and a year less term than the very competent Holl. And the Hawks get a prospect and first? No team would offer nearly so much but somehow the Leafs trades have this RHD fascination.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 24
      #12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2020
      Messages: 6,744
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,246
      Quoting: AndrewLadd
      Tbh idk much ab holl but I see a lot of leafs fans complaining ab him so he was included for cap purposes


      He's perfectly capable; had a good year last season. If he can follow it up, the difference between him and Murphy isn't significant, certainly not a 1st.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 29
      #13
      Backn 2da leff-JFK
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 1,079
      Mentions "j'aime": 388
      Murphy is reliable top 4 d on a good contract. He ain’t going anywhere anytime soon. Hawks plan is to stay mediocre and sell overpriced tickets
      OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 37
      #14
      Number 1 Kahun Fan
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 1,601
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,022
      Juulsen is a good pickup for any team but not for the hawks. We have a lot of young D coming up dont want another in the mix. Not a knock on juulsen. Ho sang would be interesting pickup for the hawks considering the injuries its worth a shot at least. The value on murphy is all over the place chi fans view him as a solid top 4 defensive dman capable of playing top line minutes while most leafs fans think murphy is the same as holl (lol). Valuewise i think its fair but others would disagree not that the hawks should or would do it. Good post.
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 40
      #15
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2017
      Messages: 3,225
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,163
      Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
      He's perfectly capable; had a good year last season. If he can follow it up, the difference between him and Murphy isn't significant, certainly not a 1st.


      I agree with you that I dont think the difference between him and Holl is not a first, but I think value-wise he could probably fetch a first from the right team
      10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 54
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2020
      Messages: 6,744
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,246
      Quoting: SlickWilly
      I agree with you that I dont think the difference between him and Holl is not a first, but I think value-wise he could probably fetch a first from the right team


      I'm sure he could. 2nd pair right handed D with some size and a solid reputation. Might take retention due to the flat cap, but I'd bet there are teams out there that would certainly consider it.
      SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 15 h 2
      #17
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 24,997
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
      Quoting: Byrr
      I must say when the title said waiver claims and it was a Blackhawks team with Toronto showing up in the deals...I expected it to be a Dell waiver claim. For a Murphy trade, the time has come and gone for that with Toronto. Holl had a great season last year in his first NHL season and will get every opportunity to follow it up. Trading a 1st and Holl+ for Murphy simply doesn't have the value needed anymore for the Leafs.


      Seconded
      10 janv. 2021 à 15 h 6
      #18
      Former Hockey Fan
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2017
      Messages: 13,144
      Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
      Quoting: AndrewLadd
      While that’s prob true I think he gets claimed tbh. Is there room for him in Detroit? J thought of that, that could be a good spot for him


      They did just claim Djoos, so maybe not.
      10 janv. 2021 à 15 h 9
      #19
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 24,997
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
      Quoting: AndrewLadd
      Tbh idk much ab holl but I see a lot of leafs fans complaining ab him so he was included for cap purposes


      Those are almost entirely trolls posing as Leaf fans.
      AndrewLadd a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 15 h 14
      #20
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 24,997
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
      Quoting: CFMan
      Juulsen is a good pickup for any team but not for the hawks. We have a lot of young D coming up dont want another in the mix. Not a knock on juulsen. Ho sang would be interesting pickup for the hawks considering the injuries its worth a shot at least. The value on murphy is all over the place chi fans view him as a solid top 4 defensive dman capable of playing top line minutes while most leafs fans think murphy is the same as holl (lol). Valuewise i think its fair but others would disagree not that the hawks should or would do it. Good post.


      I doubt any rational fan is going to say Holl and Murphy are the same player, however, to think he's worth giving up assets and more cap space to fill the exact role Holl is succeeding in is silly. Why give up assets for a marginal improvement?
      10 janv. 2021 à 16 h 39
      #21
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2018
      Messages: 6,784
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
      Quoting: CFMan
      Juulsen is a good pickup for any team but not for the hawks. We have a lot of young D coming up dont want another in the mix. Not a knock on juulsen. Ho sang would be interesting pickup for the hawks considering the injuries its worth a shot at least. The value on murphy is all over the place chi fans view him as a solid top 4 defensive dman capable of playing top line minutes while most leafs fans think murphy is the same as holl (lol). Valuewise i think its fair but others would disagree not that the hawks should or would do it. Good post.


      Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
      I doubt any rational fan is going to say Holl and Murphy are the same player, however, to think he's worth giving up assets and more cap space to fill the exact role Holl is succeeding in is silly. Why give up assets for a marginal improvement?


      It's not that Holl and Murphy are the same type of player. But they're worth the same. Holl is better offensively and Murphy is better defensively. Both are #4-5 d-man. But Holl cost less in terms of his contract, and doesn't cost any assets to get. & the difference between the two players is certainly not a top goalie prospect and a 1st. That's a laughable offer.

      Leafs don't need Murphy either. They're right side is set with depth. Brodie, Holl, Bogosian, Dermott, Lehtonen, Marincin, Liljegren, Hollowell, Kokkenen, Rasanen, and Duszak are all the options at RD right now. Murphy would be fighting for 3rd pair minutes in Toronto with Bogosian and they both play a similar style of game. Why trade for someone when you just got the same type of player for free?

      Hawks fans need to get off the "Murphy to Toronto" train, especially for anything involving a 1st. Just gets a laugh from Leafs management.
      10 janv. 2021 à 17 h 51
      #22
      Once a Kings Fan Too
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2018
      Messages: 40,211
      Mentions "j'aime": 25,128
      Quoting: AndrewLadd
      They could play him over Holl, or rotate him and Mitchell. Idk if any nhl roster has room for him in the top 6 tho


      He'd be competing with Connor Carrick and Matt Tennyson for time at #3 RD on the Devils. But that might not be helping his career, either.
      AndrewLadd a aimé ceci.
      10 janv. 2021 à 17 h 55
      #23
      Démarrer sujet
      Bo Horvat enjoyer
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2019
      Messages: 10,711
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
      Quoting: OldNYIfan
      He'd be competing with Connor Carrick and Matt Tennyson for time at #3 RD on the Devils. But that might not be helping his career, either.


      Actually the devils might be the best spot for him. Carrick and Tennyson can’t be that hard to beat out, right?
      OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage