SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Toronto Maple Leafs

Créé par: klaw2
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 10 janv. 2021
Publié: 10 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 300 000 $
1800 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 700 000 $
2800 000 $
73 250 000 $
31 250 000 $
21 150 000 $
21 050 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. Kokkonen, Mikko [Liste de réserve]
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Korpisalo, Joonas
  2. Thürkauf, Calvin [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. Miettinen, Veeti [Liste de réserve]
  3. Woll, Joseph
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $82 979 783 $0 $400 000 $520 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
C
UFA
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 700 000 $2 700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 janv. 2021 à 13 h 22
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,593
Mentions "j'aime": 9,668
I really don't think either TOR nor CHI should want to do that trade. Strome won't perform the functions of a #3C like you want him to. He's just not that type of player. Also, CHI really needs a #1C right now and Strome has a chance to really prove himself.
10 janv. 2021 à 13 h 31
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,780
Mentions "j'aime": 610
Kraken take no one?
10 janv. 2021 à 13 h 34
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,989
Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
Chicago passes. We are locked in on defense on the right side with Boqvist and Mitchell as two hot prospects, Murphy who I'll take over Holl any day, Regula who's a budding good prospect and Seabrook still around so Holl doesn't offer much value. Mikko is an okay prospect but Hawks are loaded with okay or better prospects on the defensive left side. Kerfoot type of players aren't anything special. Classic case of not understanding the needs of the team you're trying to acquire a player from.

From a Leafs perspective, don't think Strome wouldn't be a good fit as a 3rd liner long term and with JT locked into 4 years it would be a bad move to acquire Strome.
10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 3
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,122
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: ChiHawk
Chicago passes. We are locked in on defense on the right side with Boqvist and Mitchell as two hot prospects, Murphy who I'll take over Holl any day, Regula who's a budding good prospect and Seabrook still around so Holl doesn't offer much value. Mikko is an okay prospect but Hawks are loaded with okay or better prospects on the defensive left side. Kerfoot type of players aren't anything special. Classic case of not understanding the needs of the team you're trying to acquire a player from.

From a Leafs perspective, don't think Strome wouldn't be a good fit as a 3rd liner long term and with JT locked into 4 years it would be a bad move to acquire Strome.


I get Chicago is in a rebuild but they have like the worst defense in the league, they are in experienced but are terrible they have given up the most high danger chances 2 years running and certainly haven't improved - I wouldn't do this trade as Murphy and Holl are the same player I'll give Murphy the edge as he's played more but he certainly doesn't hold the fort on the defensive end he does well with a quality partner (just like Holl)
10 janv. 2021 à 14 h 5
#5
Meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 239
Neither of those trades are likely to happen. Dermott will likely be picked up by Seatlle.

I do fully expect that Sandin and Liljegren will be the third pairing next year. It is the way Toronto rolls. Should we put one of Sandin or LIljegren on the third pairing when we have the absolutely perfect partner to mentor them and ensure they not only succeed this year, but also long-term? No, no. We should waste that development opportunity on a 27-year-old. Let's instead put them both in the lineup next year, together, so they can't be mentored, or protected, and will fail together.
10 janv. 2021 à 15 h 17
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,989
Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
Quoting: Boomer125
I get Chicago is in a rebuild but they have like the worst defense in the league, they are in experienced but are terrible they have given up the most high danger chances 2 years running and certainly haven't improved - I wouldn't do this trade as Murphy and Holl are the same player I'll give Murphy the edge as he's played more but he certainly doesn't hold the fort on the defensive end he does well with a quality partner (just like Holl)


Totally wrong on Murphy. Murphy has been the rock defensively as a pairing, whether that was playing with Keith, Carlsson, Koekko or Matta, not the other way around like Holl who needs a good defensive partner to succeed. Murphy is hands down a better defender then Holl and not only do isolated advanced stats prove that but I also watch both teams extensively. No way does Holl have as much value as Murphy and it's more then just an edge.

Furthermore, not a chance Holl plays over two of the hottest top 20 defensive prospects in the NHL in Boqvist and Mitchell for a rebuilding team. So there goes 3 spots making Holl the 7th man which Seabs has for good reason. Furthermore, Hawks have Beaudin, Kalynuk, Carlsson, as prospects on the left side and Mikko definitely isn't better then all of those guys so he adds little to no value.

Regarding Hawks defensive against high danger chances, Hawks have De Haan who only played 29 games last season so he's more or less new, added Zadarov who's a zone entry shut down guy, added Janmark and Soderberg who are excellent defensive up front to Kampf, Carps and Toews if he comes back. The defensive players on both offensive and defense are improved quite a bit.

Again, this trade does nothing to move the needle for the Hawks to give up a 23 year 2C who's put up .77ppg since joining them and .86ppg if you subtract the handful of games he played at wing as a bad experiment; sorry...just makes no sense.
10 janv. 2021 à 15 h 31
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Strome sucks
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage