SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Revised Laine Trade

Créé par: snowyglacyuwu
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 6 janv. 2021
Publié: 6 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Our top five prospects plus 2 first rounders is more than enough for Laine. Carlo is untouchable even if it involves a high caliber player like Laine.
Transactions
1.
WPG
  1. Clifton, Connor
  2. Frederic, Trent
  3. Lindholm, Pär
  4. Studnicka, Jack
  5. Zboril, Jakub
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
  7. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (DET)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (DET)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (DET)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $78 763 389 $964 222 $2 000 000 $2 736 611 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 995 000 $4 995 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 janv. 2021 à 16 h 24
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 546
Mentions "j'aime": 177
Carlo for McDavid? Thats a NOOO from Boston. Hes UNTOUCHABLE
ConnorMcJesus et BStinson a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2021 à 16 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,729
Mentions "j'aime": 6,991
The firsts are nice, but other than that there is nothing Winnipeg needs or wants.
BStinson a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2021 à 16 h 26
#3
The other ones Drai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,860
Mentions "j'aime": 689
Quoting: LGR
Carlo for McDavid? Thats a NOOO from Boston. Hes UNTOUCHABLE


Carlo for McDavid and Draisaitl plus a 1st is such a bad trade
add JP and Yamo plus Nuge all at 50% is still a no i assume

Cause Carlo is the next Bobby Orr
6 janv. 2021 à 16 h 27
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Carlo isn’t “untouchable”, this is a hot take. No one is really untouchable and especially not non-superstars.
6 janv. 2021 à 16 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 98
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Just saying if you want Laine, your leftovers and two firsts will not cut it. We are in a win-now mode and picks won't necessarily help us.
6 janv. 2021 à 17 h 0
#6
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,147
Mentions "j'aime": 6,988
Holy crap that just made me throw up. No interest from boston. Probably isn’t the right fit for Winnipeg either, but that trade would be really bad for Boston.
6 janv. 2021 à 19 h 27
#7
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,931
Mentions "j'aime": 5,360
Wings pass, we don't want him
6 janv. 2021 à 19 h 29
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 462
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: buffbry
Wings pass, we don't want him


You're getting a very solid young third liner for a low price I'm sure Yzerman would take that in a heartbeat
6 janv. 2021 à 20 h 22
#9
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,931
Mentions "j'aime": 5,360
Quoting: minionhypers
You're getting a very solid young third liner for a low price I'm sure Yzerman would take that in a heartbeat


Nah we don't have room and have plenty of this type of player already. We are good with keeping our picks
6 janv. 2021 à 21 h 19
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Both teams likely reject...Bruins throw too much in for an inconsistant player and Jets would likely want quality v quantity

Quoting: LGR
Carlo for McDavid? Thats a NOOO from Boston. Hes UNTOUCHABLE


Quoting: BStinson
Carlo isn’t “untouchable”, this is a hot take. No one is really untouchable and especially not non-superstars.


Untouchable is a hard term to use, in saying that: Carlo is likely as close to untouchable as one can be (along with McAvoy and Pasta). However, OBVIOUSLY for the right price, anyone is available.
Untouchable most likely means "we do not want to or need to move him, and we love him" so if teams want him they gotta overpay to get him.
6 janv. 2021 à 21 h 29
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 376
Mentions "j'aime": 135
Wings fans all say "wings pass" lol to every trade,

I actually think Ritchie might work out for the wings, hes only 25, former first round pick that hasnt panned out just yet, but he isnt exactly a bust

I dont think the wings would give up 3 picks for him, but id say maybe a prospect or a 4th rounder and i would go for it, Boston may end up waiving him anyway? so wings could take a flyer on him and see if he fits in? I like it, just change it to a single 4th ? if not thats cool too, try him out this next season and see what he does. \

Its tiring everyone just says pass, but doesnt even think about it
6 janv. 2021 à 23 h 23
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: Silkysmooth42

Untouchable is a hard term to use, in saying that: Carlo is likely as close to untouchable as one can be (along with McAvoy and Pasta). However, OBVIOUSLY for the right price, anyone is available.
Untouchable most likely means "we do not want to or need to move him, and we love him" so if teams want him they gotta overpay to get him.

Seems like every youngish player then would be untouchable which is why I have a problem with the term used this way. Untouchable to me would be a franchise level player (eg McDavid, Crosby). Very few on this site what to talk about fair or realistic value but rather try to fleece each other like the move will happen in real life which is super odd to me.
7 janv. 2021 à 23 h 7
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: BStinson
Seems like every youngish player then would be untouchable which is why I have a problem with the term used this way. Untouchable to me would be a franchise level player (eg McDavid, Crosby). Very few on this site what to talk about fair or realistic value but rather try to fleece each other like the move will happen in real life which is super odd to me.


true. but also in Carlos case i see it as a young player with a good salary who is good, but doesnt have a high cap so he isnt gonna overdevelop and become too expensive

Idk its very case dependant
8 janv. 2021 à 11 h 12
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 465
Mentions "j'aime": 226
Quoting: digitalbath
Wings fans all say "wings pass" lol to every trade,

I actually think Ritchie might work out for the wings, hes only 25, former first round pick that hasnt panned out just yet, but he isnt exactly a bust

I dont think the wings would give up 3 picks for him, but id say maybe a prospect or a 4th rounder and i would go for it, Boston may end up waiving him anyway? so wings could take a flyer on him and see if he fits in? I like it, just change it to a single 4th ? if not thats cool too, try him out this next season and see what he does. \

Its tiring everyone just says pass, but doesnt even think about it


Honestly, the value's not particularly bad here. The kicker is that the WIngs' bottom 6 is pretty full as is without factoring in potential prospects, and adding Ritchie doesn't really make the team significantly better. The Wings have bottom 6 guys in spades, and there's always a plethora available in free agency. Is it really worth spending anything at all to pick up a player when you could get a rough equivalent for free next season?
8 janv. 2021 à 11 h 28
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
true. but also in Carlos case i see it as a young player with a good salary who is good, but doesnt have a high cap so he isnt gonna overdevelop and become too expensive

Idk its very case dependant

Generally young players are let’s I like to call cost effective because they’re cost controlled for generally 7 years (depending on when they sign their ELC). Generally only guys that are elite or franchise level don’t get bridged but extended for top dollar long term. So then the argument is back on the performance of the player so I can see young 1Cs or top pairing guys being labeled as requiring an overpay or “untouchable”.
8 janv. 2021 à 23 h 42
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: BStinson
Generally young players are let’s I like to call cost effective because they’re cost controlled for generally 7 years (depending on when they sign their ELC). Generally only guys that are elite or franchise level don’t get bridged but extended for top dollar long term. So then the argument is back on the performance of the player so I can see young 1Cs or top pairing guys being labeled as requiring an overpay or “untouchable”.


Thats what im saying with Carlo, as a defensive dman with a cap not much higher than he is now, the cap i see him having in a year or two when his contract expires is a 5 mllion dollar 6/7/8 year deal, REALLY good for a player of his skill, but defensive dmen are typically paid less.
So u r right, but that also proves my point lmaooo

Good point tho!!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage