SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3 way trade with goaltending fix

Créé par: CEO
Équipe: 2020-21 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 5 janv. 2021
Publié: 5 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Three way trade works as follows:

Vegas firsts sends Marc-Andre Fleury to New Jersey.

New Jersey then retains 2 500 000, and sends Fleury to Washington. They also send Crwaford to Vegas, reuniting Lehner-Crawford.

Washington recieves Fleury at 4.5 Million, then sends Copley and Nick Jensen to NJD. Then they send a 2023 2nd round pick to Vegas.

BTW im a fan of neither of these 3 teams.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Fleury, Marc-Andre
24 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
WSH
NJD
  1. Copley, Pheonix
  2. Jensen, Nick
Détails additionnels:
Part of 3 way trade
2.
WSH
VGK
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
Part of 3 way trade
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de VGK
Logo de WSH
2022
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2023
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $71 044 878 $419 749 $1 330 000 $10 455 122 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
735 000 $735 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Fleury, Marc-Andre
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance730 000 $$730K)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 janv. 2021 à 12 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 1,017
Just checking if I missed anything. NJ eats $2.5M of MA Fleury, then eats Jensen’s deal, and also gets Copley, and they lose Crawford? I don’t think Jensen is as bad as people make him out to be for what it’s worth, but they are taking on cap in a flat cap world

I don’t think Crawford goes anywhere simply because he was just signed, but I do think Jersey needs more to do it.
yikes et villenash a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2021 à 13 h 1
#2
I want Gourde back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 2,372
Quoting: NLidstrom
Just checking if I missed anything. NJ eats $2.5M of MA Fleury, then eats Jensen’s deal, and also gets Copley, and they lose Crawford? I don’t think Jensen is as bad as people make him out to be for what it’s worth, but they are taking on cap in a flat cap world

I don’t think Crawford goes anywhere simply because he was just signed, but I do think Jersey needs more to do it.


Yeah I didn't understand why the the 2nd is going to Vegas instead of NJ
yikes, villenash et NLidstrom a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2021 à 13 h 4
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 460
Mentions "j'aime": 9
There's no way NJD trade Crawford who they just signed btw and i think Blackwood just got injured so they're not going for a Copley/Senn tandem, this would be the worst goalie tandem in the NHL even worst than the Delia/Subban 😂
5 janv. 2021 à 13 h 14
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
The only team that I understand the motivation for is Vegas.

Vegas: Dumps a bad $7Mx2 contract and gets a 2nd and Crawford out of it? Usually you don't gain from dumping a bad contract, not that Crawford's contract is good.
NJ: Just signed Crawford but they are moving him out for the right to pay $2.5Mx2 retention, a 6/7D and a 3G.
Wash: Needs to pay $4.5Mx2 for a backup goalie that they don't want. Plus, for the right to that (still) bad contract they give away a 2nd, Jensen (near dump), Copley.

Using mostly what you have here...
Vegas would send Fleury and the compensation of the retention (1st, or such) to NJ.
NJ would retain the full $3.5M (Caps can't take a $4.5M hit for Fleury, not even a $3.5M hit, but I'm going with your AGM) and send him to Was
Wash would send out Jensen and Panik (for cap reasons, they are over the cap as it is so they can not bring in $3.5M/$4.5M and only send out $2.5M (Coplay is 90% burried))

So...
Vegas
- Fleury, 1st
+ Jensen, ($7Mx2 freed cap space)

NJ
- $3.5Mx2 cap hit
+ 1st, Panik

Wash
- Jensen, Panik
+ Fleury ($3.5Mx2)
villenash et CEO a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2021 à 13 h 58
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,525
Mentions "j'aime": 668
Quoting: Yojimbo
The only team that I understand the motivation for is Vegas.

Vegas: Dumps a bad $7Mx2 contract and gets a 2nd and Crawford out of it? Usually you don't gain from dumping a bad contract, not that Crawford's contract is good.
NJ: Just signed Crawford but they are moving him out for the right to pay $2.5Mx2 retention, a 6/7D and a 3G.
Wash: Needs to pay $4.5Mx2 for a backup goalie that they don't want. Plus, for the right to that (still) bad contract they give away a 2nd, Jensen (near dump), Copley.

Using mostly what you have here...
Vegas would send Fleury and the compensation of the retention (1st, or such) to NJ.
NJ would retain the full $3.5M (Caps can't take a $4.5M hit for Fleury, not even a $3.5M hit, but I'm going with your AGM) and send him to Was
Wash would send out Jensen and Panik (for cap reasons, they are over the cap as it is so they can not bring in $3.5M/$4.5M and only send out $2.5M (Coplay is 90% burried))

So...
Vegas
- Fleury, 1st
+ Jensen, ($7Mx2 freed cap space)

NJ
- $3.5Mx2 cap hit
+ 1st, Panik

Wash
- Jensen, Panik
+ Fleury ($3.5Mx2)


yours seems more realistic, but Vegas would want a back up goaltender, and I dont think they'd ship a first. How about this:

Vegas:
-Fleury (retaining 500k), whitecloud, 3rd.
+Jensen, Copley

NJ:
-Half of fleury's remaining cap hit (3.25x2)
+Whitecloud, 2nd, Panik

Wash:
-Jensen, Panik, Copley
+Fleury (3.25x2)
tgasp98 a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2021 à 14 h 18
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: CEO
yours seems more realistic, but Vegas would want a back up goaltender, and I dont think they'd ship a first. How about this:

Vegas:
-Fleury (retaining 500k), whitecloud, 3rd.
+Jensen, Copley

NJ:
-Half of fleury's remaining cap hit (3.25x2)
+Whitecloud, 2nd, Panik

Wash:
-Jensen, Panik, Copley
+Fleury (3.25x2)


I can't say that I have an opinion on Whitecloud, so maybe he is more than I give credit for...

You also have a 3rd going from Vegas but a 2nd going to NJ. A 3rd isn't going to get it done. There might be an argument if the retention was 1 year, but it is 2 years. You are not going to get a team to "buy" a 3rd rounder for $6.5M. It cost Toronto a first for Carolina to take $6.25Mx1 cap of Marleau, and technically that overall move was only $835,000 in actual dollars for Carolina, yet cost a 1st.

In overall terms, I do not think that adding Coplay hurts the Washington side. I still don't think that they do it, but that's the AGM.
Does Whitecloud+2nd = 1st? I don't know. It's not going to be cheap for free up $7Mx2 though. Fleury is not a starter anymore.
tgasp98 a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2021 à 20 h 24
#7
VGKNation702
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 5,047
Mentions "j'aime": 1,617
Quoting: Yojimbo
I can't say that I have an opinion on Whitecloud, so maybe he is more than I give credit for...

You also have a 3rd going from Vegas but a 2nd going to NJ. A 3rd isn't going to get it done. There might be an argument if the retention was 1 year, but it is 2 years. You are not going to get a team to "buy" a 3rd rounder for $6.5M. It cost Toronto a first for Carolina to take $6.25Mx1 cap of Marleau, and technically that overall move was only $835,000 in actual dollars for Carolina, yet cost a 1st.

In overall terms, I do not think that adding Coplay hurts the Washington side. I still don't think that they do it, but that's the AGM.
Does Whitecloud+2nd = 1st? I don't know. It's not going to be cheap for free up $7Mx2 though. Fleury is not a starter anymore.


Yeah we aren’t shipping whitecloud and a first out. If they were going to do something like this, they would have this year when they had the 29th pick lol.
5 janv. 2021 à 22 h 12
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: VGKNation702
Yeah we aren’t shipping whitecloud and a first out. If they were going to do something like this, they would have this year when they had the 29th pick lol.


Nobody suggested Whitecloud + 1st.
CEO a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage