Forums/Armchair-GM

Opening Night

Créé par: HadesOfSoCal
Date de création initiale: jan 4, 2021
Publié: 4 jan à 12 h 26
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Explications
These are the projected lines per NHL Network.


Projected Captaincy and Alternate Captains:

C - Ryan Getzalf
A - Adam Henrique
A - Kevin Shattenkirk / Jakob Silfverberg
Rachats de contrats
  • Corey Perry: 6 625 000 $
  • Simon Despres: 0 $
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2021
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
EDM
ANA
2022
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
NSH
2023
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $75 779 999 $0 $850 000 $5 720 001 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
ANA
Milano, Sonny
1 700 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
ANA
Getzlaf, Ryan
8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
ANA
Heinen, Danton
2 800 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
ANA
Rakell, Rickard
3 789 444 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
ANA
Henrique, Adam
5 825 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
ANA
Silfverberg, Jakob
5 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
ANA
Jones, Max
863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
ANA
Zegras, Trevor
925 000 $
C
RFA - 3
ANA
Terry, Troy
1 450 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
ANA
Grant, Derek
1 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
ANA
Steel, Sam
863 333 $
C
RFA - 1
ANA
Backes, David
4 500 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
ANA
Lindholm, Hampus
5 205 556 $
DG
UFA - 2
ANA
Shattenkirk, Kevin
3 900 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
ANA
Gibson, John
6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
ANA
Fowler, Cam
6 500 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
ANA
Manson, Josh
4 100 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 2
ANA
Miller, Ryan
1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
ANA
Larsson, Jacob
1 200 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
ANA
Djoos, Christian
1 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
ANA
Rowney, Carter
1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
ANA
Kesler, Ryan
6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
ANA
Deslauriers, Nicolas
1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
ANA
Agozzino, Andrew
700 000 $ (0 $)
C, AG
UFA - 1
ANA
Curran, Kodie
1 000 000 $ (0 $)
DG
UFA - 2
ANA
Stolarz, Anthony
750 000 $ (0 $)
G
UFA - 1
ANA
Lundeström, Isac
925 000 $ (0 $)
C, AG
RFA - 1
ANA
Comtois, Maxime
820 000 $ (0 $)
C, AG
RFA - 1
ANA
Hakanpää, Jani
750 000 $ (0 $)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 jan à 12 h 36
#1
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 1,159
Mentions "j'aime": 614
I think the Ducks are going to do the same with Zegras that the Kings do with Turcotte (though Zegras might be closer to NHL ready), play under 6 games, play in the AHL to maximize minutes, and keep both teams in the hunt for a top 5 pick.
HadesOfSoCal et Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
4 jan à 12 h 38
#2
Lenny7
Rejoint: jan 2017
Messages: 6,274
Mentions "j'aime": 3,812
I absolutely think Comtois should make this team. Fire Derek Grant into the abyss if that's what it takes, but he should be on this team playing in a top 9 role.
HadesOfSoCal a aimé ceci.
4 jan à 12 h 40
#3
Démarrer sujet
HadesOfSocal
Rejoint: déc 2019
Messages: 3,936
Mentions "j'aime": 1,648
Quoting: Lenny7
I absolutely think Comtois should make this team. Fire Derek Grant into the abyss if that's what it takes, but he should be on this team playing in a top 9 role.


I agree. But i really like Grants game. Not sure why the Ducks are so adamant on playing Backes.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
4 jan à 12 h 44
#4
Lenny7
Rejoint: jan 2017
Messages: 6,274
Mentions "j'aime": 3,812
Quoting: tryger
I think the Ducks are going to do the same with Zegras that the Kings do with Turcotte (though Zegras might be closer to NHL ready), play under 6 games, play in the AHL to maximize minutes, and keep both teams in the hunt for a top 5 pick.


I think you're probably right, but I hope not. Otherwise, what was the point of getting Shatty? Obviously I don't think Shatty pulls them from the abyss and suddenly makes them a threat to storm up in the division, but it seems like a dumb move if you're not going to try to put your best team on the ice every night? If he's not on the roster, I assume it'd be more of a "There's a whole lot of forwards that are going to need a roster spot, or we'll risk losing them on waivers" situation, where there's no room for him right off the bat, but I really think he belongs on this team, than it is a "The AHL and it's extremely truncated season is a better option for you" situation.
HadesOfSoCal a aimé ceci.
4 jan à 12 h 49
#5
Lenny7
Rejoint: jan 2017
Messages: 6,274
Mentions "j'aime": 3,812
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
I agree. But i really like Grants game. Not sure why the Ducks are so adamant on playing Backes.


Agreed...maybe GMBM hopes that if he plays him a bunch right off the bat, he'll inevitably end up on LTIR?

Ah well, I guess the Gulls will be fun to watch (If that ever actually happens).
HadesOfSoCal a aimé ceci.
4 jan à 13 h 02
#6
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 1,159
Mentions "j'aime": 614
Quoting: Lenny7
I think you're probably right, but I hope not. Otherwise, what was the point of getting Shatty? Obviously I don't think Shatty pulls them from the abyss and suddenly makes them a threat to storm up in the division, but it seems like a dumb move if you're not going to try to put your best team on the ice every night? If he's not on the roster, I assume it'd be more of a "There's a whole lot of forwards that are going to need a roster spot, or we'll risk losing them on waivers" situation, where there's no room for him right off the bat, but I really think he belongs on this team, than it is a "The AHL and it's extremely truncated season is a better option for you" situation.


I thought Shatty was a good move considering the ducks are particularly weak on that side (not a fan of Manson), and not necessarily an indication that they have changed to compete now. There is an argument that the ducks have done a quick rebuild and have already obtained their future #1 center and #1 defenseman. But I think they aren't done yet, Getz, Perry, and Kesler have left big holes, but Steel and Zegras are definitely steps in the right direction.
4 jan à 13 h 13
#7
Lenny7
Rejoint: jan 2017
Messages: 6,274
Mentions "j'aime": 3,812
Quoting: tryger
I thought Shatty was a good move considering the ducks are particularly weak on that side (not a fan of Manson), and not necessarily an indication that they have changed to compete now. There is an argument that the ducks have done a quick rebuild and have already obtained their future #1 center and #1 defenseman. But I think they aren't done yet, Getz, Perry, and Kesler have left big holes, but Steel and Zegras are definitely steps in the right direction.


I don't know...unless they move Manson, I could honestly see Shatty as a guy who doesn't get protected during the expansion draft (unfortunately).
4 jan à 16 h 19
#8
Rejoint: fév 2016
Messages: 283
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Considering Zegras is playing wing for Team USA and we're deep at center, plus potentially getting minimal training camp time, I can't imagine he makes the opening night roster in the center position. Not to mention I hate the idea of Steel on the fourth line. (and Backes in the lineup at all)
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage