SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Legit options that wont ever happen

Créé par: Rob32sjsharks
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 30 déc. 2020
Publié: 1 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is possible, except we have Wilson as GM so keep dreaming.
Montreal is over the cap and Armia looks like odd man out with Corey being an adequate replacement on min contract.
Roslovic wants out of the Jets so this works to our favor!
give him a 1 year deal and at years end we resign 2 of the 4 between Sorenson, Donato, Armia Roslovic.

This isn’t a huge upgrade but it is enough to win us the last spot in the playoffs and if we still suck 2 more pieces to trade at the deadline for picks/ prospects.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 850 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Gambrell, Dylan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Roslovic, Jack [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Kellman, Joel
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $74 185 000 $0 $512 500 $7 315 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
836 667 $836 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 39
#1
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
id rather jump off my roof than make that jets trade - lets keep our firsts sharks fans (:
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 40
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 1,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
if gambrell is a center I love the trade
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 41
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: yikes
id rather jump off my roof than make that jets trade - lets keep our firsts sharks fans (:


Really? Move down from 16-19 OA to 38-45 OA makes you want to jump off your roof?
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 41
#4
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Quoting: HabsFan77
if gambrell is a center I love the trade


he is
nickthehabsfan a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: HabsFan77
if gambrell is a center I love the trade


How ? We want to win next year, this is a downgrade
OlegP a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 42
#6
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Really? Move down from 16-19 OA to 38-45 OA makes you want to jump off your roof?


really? were drafting 16-19? didnt know this season was already over.. its more likely were 1-2 than 16-19 with our schedule lol, have you seen it?
ASharksFan a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 43
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: HabsFan77
if gambrell is a center I love the trade

He is a fringe 4th line center who might have 3C potential but needs a change of scenery.
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 1,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: GMs
How ? We want to win next year, this is a downgrade


with depth at the wings it wouldn't hurt to have another young center
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 44
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: GMs
How ? We want to win next year, this is a downgrade


Your Also over the cap this is a cap saving move by you guys.
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 45
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: yikes
really? were drafting 16-19? didnt know this season was already over.. its more likely were 1-2 than 16-19 with our schedule lol, have you seen it?


We’re a good team just need things to go right I think at worst we’re 10OA best 24OA
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 53
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
KEEP that 1st at all costs. History repeats itself and I really really don't want to be in the same position as last year. Unless we're talking about an elite talent at a great cap hit coming to SJ for an irrefutable price, that pick should be 100% untouchable. Roslovic does not justify giving up what could very well be a top 5 pick.

Armia trade is ok
yikes et ASharksFan a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 55
#12
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
We’re a good team just need things to go right I think at worst we’re 10OA best 24OA


we drafted 3OA last year? at worst we aren't 10OA we are 1OA. Its blind faith to believe were "easily" gonna be 10OA when you look at how things went last year and at our schedule. I still have faith we can do well but just trading away our first is dumb unless its at TDL and were over .650 point % (meaning were killing it).
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 57
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
KEEP that 1st at all costs. History repeats itself and I really really don't want to be in the same position as last year. Unless we're talking about an elite talent at a great cap hit coming to SJ for an irrefutable price, that pick should be 100% untouchable. Roslovic does not justify giving up what could very well be a top 5 pick.

Armia trade is ok


Top 5 pick your 100% right but this draft is weak with top talent but deeper in B/C level talent so 15 OA isn’t much different here than 40 OA, but 1-10 OA is way better than 15 OA in this draft.
With these two I feel like we make the playoffs and could be decent putting us at 16-22 OA.
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 58
#14
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,545
Mentions "j'aime": 12,303
Can you send the Jets True instead of Kellman please, apparently True and Ehlers are related!
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 58
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Montreal is not over the cap. They are comfortably under the cap with taxi squads

Only Vegas has cap problems rn
GMs et Morons a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 59
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: yikes
we drafted 3OA last year? at worst we aren't 10OA we are 1OA. Its blind faith to believe were "easily" gonna be 10OA when you look at how things went last year and at our schedule. I still have faith we can do well but just trading away our first is dumb unless its at TDL and were over .650 point % (meaning were killing it).


I understand but we’re healthy going into the season and still have a lot of well rested talent so we will
Play better than last year but we need depth.
1 janv. 2021 à 19 h 1
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: OlegP
Montreal is not over the cap. They are comfortably under the cap with taxi squads

Just looked and they are over by 1.1 based on the current 23
I could be wrong.
1 janv. 2021 à 19 h 3
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Just looked and they are over by 1.1 based on the current 23
I could be wrong.


Weal will be on the taxi squad and wont play much if at all, thats 1.1 million saved. They are under and they'll have more cap savings with guys like Evans and Poehling inserted into the lineup. Look at roster spot and LTIR. Teams like STL, Capitals, Bolts are well under.

Vegas has no options and only 21 contracts while over the cap
Rob32sjsharks et Morons a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 19 h 5
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Your Also over the cap this is a cap saving move by you guys.


We just have to send Byron on the Taxi Squad
OlegP a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 19 h 6
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: OlegP
Weal will be on the taxi squad and wont play much if at all, thats 1.1 million saved. They are under and they'll have more cap savings with guys like Evans and Poehling inserted into the lineup. Look at roster spot and LTIR. Teams like STL, Capitals, Bolts are well under.

Vegas has no options and only 21 contracts while over the cap


I know but Armia isn’t in your future plans and would be a good fit here in San Jose. I totally get the idea of keeping him I just thought give him a good place to call home, free up some cap space for trade deadline.
1 janv. 2021 à 19 h 7
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: OlegP
Weal will be on the taxi squad and wont play much if at all, thats 1.1 million saved. They are under and they'll have more cap savings with guys like Evans and Poehling inserted into the lineup. Look at roster spot and LTIR. Teams like STL, Capitals, Bolts are well under.

Vegas has no options and only 21 contracts while over the cap


Vegas won’t trade with sharks!
1 janv. 2021 à 19 h 8
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: GMs
We just have to send Byron on the Taxi Squad


Is that legal or would part of his cap still count on the total?
Not sure exactly how the taxi squad vs 23 man roster works and why not just do 20 man roster and taxi squad.
1 janv. 2021 à 19 h 10
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Top 5 pick your 100% right but this draft is weak with top talent but deeper in B/C level talent so 15 OA isn’t much different here than 40 OA, but 1-10 OA is way better than 15 OA in this draft.
With these two I feel like we make the playoffs and could be decent putting us at 16-22 OA.


If we were a legit good team I really wouldn't have a huge issue with this because it would be more like a 30-35 spot difference. But a couple of injuries and some good old Martin Jones goal tending and we're ****ed. This is more likely to be a top 10 pick than you think in my opinion. Even if it ends up being more like 15-20, that's still a gamble not worth taking. Look at the Rangers, they got the draft lottery even with garbage odds (and some rigging from the League but I digress). This is like paying that price for a slightly more accomplished Ryan Donato. The risk/reward is way too skewed toward risky IMO.
1 janv. 2021 à 19 h 16
#24
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
If we were a legit good team I really wouldn't have a huge issue with this because it would be more like a 30-35 spot difference. But a couple of injuries and some good old Martin Jones goal tending and we're ****ed. This is more likely to be a top 10 pick than you think in my opinion. Even if it ends up being more like 15-20, that's still a gamble not worth taking. Look at the Rangers, they got the draft lottery even with garbage odds (and some rigging from the League but I digress). This is like paying that price for a slightly more accomplished Ryan Donato. The risk/reward is way too skewed toward risky IMO.


Then what if the pick is top 10 protected? Personally I would do a 2nd but I value our 2022 second more than the 21 first based on depth and quality of the players in the draft classes.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 19 h 24
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Then what if the pick is top 10 protected? Personally I would do a 2nd but I value our 2022 second more than the 21 first based on depth and quality of the players in the draft classes.


I'd much rather give them a 2nd and then some than that 1st.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage