SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

One More Trade

Équipe: 2020-21 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 29 déc. 2020
Publié: 1 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
1. Chicago's need to fill the offensive void left by long-term illness/injury of Toews, Dach and A Nylander creates an opportunity for Ottawa to get rid of Zaitsev's long-term contract. Ottawa offers Chicago Galchenyuk and Balcers if Chicago is willing to trade Murphy for Zaitsev ($500K retained).
Transactions
OTT
  1. Murphy, Connor
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $65 459 249 $0 $5 730 000 $16 040 751 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance710 000 $$710K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
749 250 $749 250 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
735 000 $735 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
747 500 $747 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 janv. 2021 à 16 h 8
#1
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,313
Mentions "j'aime": 2,075
Chicago rejects, add a 1st
Galchenyuk is washed
Zaitsev is a dump
and Balcer is an ok prospect
So for Chicago to accept remove Zaitsev, and add Formenton or Batherson
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 17 h 20
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: Beetlejuice
Chicago rejects, add a 1st
Galchenyuk is washed
Zaitsev is a dump
and Balcer is an ok prospect
So for Chicago to accept remove Zaitsev, and add Formenton or Batherson


Pffft! The classic overvaluing of a 3rd pair d-man.

Murphy doesn't get that good of a prospect. Balcers and a mid round pick is much closer
1 janv. 2021 à 17 h 28
#3
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,313
Mentions "j'aime": 2,075
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Pffft! The classic overvaluing of a 3rd pair d-man.

Murphy doesn't get that good of a prospect. Balcers and a mid round pick is much closer


Murphy is a top 4 d-man is the best defensemen on Chicago
1 janv. 2021 à 17 h 29
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: Beetlejuice
Murphy is a top 4 d-man is the best defensemen on Chicago


Lol. No he's not.

Just because he's the best d-man on a terrible team like Chicago, doesn't make him a top 4. He's a #5 guy. No offence to his game, can kill penalties sometimes but can't be relied upon to consistently kill them. That's not a top 4 guy at all.
1 janv. 2021 à 17 h 35
#5
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,313
Mentions "j'aime": 2,075
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Lol. No he's not.

Just because he's the best d-man on a terrible team like Chicago, doesn't make him a top 4. He's a #5 guy. No offence to his game, can kill penalties sometimes but can't be relied upon to consistently kill them. That's not a top 4 guy at all.

Have you watched him play??
Murphy is a very good penalty killer and was a good reason why Chicago had a great pk last season and he was on the top unit, Murphy has a good physicality to his game and is good in Blackhawks zone. Murphy is definitely a top 4 defensemen, and the only people who don't agree are Toronto fans, who also wanted him before the Kapanen trade
1 janv. 2021 à 17 h 39
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: Beetlejuice
Have you watched him play??
Murphy is a very good penalty killer and was a good reason why Chicago had a great pk last season and he was on the top unit, Murphy has a good physicality to his game and is good in Blackhawks zone. Murphy is definitely a top 4 defensemen, and the only people who don't agree are Toronto fans, who also wanted him before the Kapanen trade


I've actually worked for his junior team while he was there and followed him a lot. So in positive I know him better than you think.
& Kapanen for Murphy never worked out for a reason. Toronto management knew Kapanen was worth more. They weren't gonna settle for that low of a package. That should tell you quite a bit about his value.

He's not a top 4.
1 janv. 2021 à 17 h 41
#7
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,976
Mentions "j'aime": 4,044
Quoting: Ryminister_27
I've actually worked for his junior team while he was there and followed him a lot. So in positive I know him better than you think.
& Kapanen for Murphy never worked out for a reason. Toronto management knew Kapanen was worth more. They weren't gonna settle for that low of a package. That should tell you quite a bit about his value.

He's not a top 4.


I have to disagree here with you Murphy is an excellent top 4 Dman, he is probably worth around late ish first pretty much 20+ and that's about it but he would be an excellent addition to any teams defensive core
Beetlejuice a aimé ceci.
1 janv. 2021 à 17 h 48
#8
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,313
Mentions "j'aime": 2,075
Quoting: Ryminister_27
I've actually worked for his junior team while he was there and followed him a lot. So in positive I know him better than you think.
& Kapanen for Murphy never worked out for a reason. Toronto management knew Kapanen was worth more. They weren't gonna settle for that low of a package. That should tell you quite a bit about his value.

He's not a top 4.

Ok you watched him 8 years ago, I've watched Murphy every hawks game since he joined the team, Murphy as a Blackhawks has been great defensively, been great on the PK, and has been very physical for us, so I really don't believe you watch his games as a Blackhawk, because the people who watch him and study his game in the past few season know he's a good top 4 defensemen and is worth a late 1st or a 2nd and a decent prospect
1 janv. 2021 à 17 h 49
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: theleano1
I have to disagree here with you Murphy is an excellent top 4 Dman, he is probably worth around late ish first pretty much 20+ and that's about it but he would be an excellent addition to any teams defensive core


Cool. I mean not many stats support him being a top 4 d-man at all.

Quoting: Beetlejuice
Ok you watched him 8 years ago, I've watched Murphy every hawks game since he joined the team, Murphy as a Blackhawks has been great defensively, been great on the PK, and has been very physical for us, so I really don't believe you watch his games as a Blackhawk, because the people who watch him and study his game in the past few season know he's a good top 4 defensemen and is worth a late 1st or a 2nd and a decent prospect


sure, I'll trust a Hawks fan on the opinion of a Hawks player. Hawks fans always seem to know the right answer grimace
1 janv. 2021 à 18 h 16
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Zaitsev is a bridge too far
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage