SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Embrace the Tank

Créé par: JordanCGrant
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 30 déc. 2020
Publié: 30 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Hockey Gods have forced the Tank this season. Here is how I would try to maximize the assets from this year and hope you have a healthy team for next year. We probably will suck more than the Wings did last season especially after the deadline. Usually, you don't rock your young goalies this way, but if Dylan Strome is your 1C your season is over considering we have been the worst defensive team for past two years and now we have no centers for faceoffs or driving offense.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Janmark, Mattias
Détails additionnels:
Chicago retains $1,000,000 of his salary
5.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de WPG
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de BOS
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $64 070 481 $1 090 244 $2 880 000 $17 429 519 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 déc. 2020 à 8 h 50
#1
Biased Opinion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
This season Chicago should chase the tank like a Soviet dog
JordanCGrant et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
30 déc. 2020 à 8 h 52
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,582
Hard pass on that WPG trade. Murphy is a lot better than DeHaan. I also don't think PIT does that trade for DeHaan.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
30 déc. 2020 à 9 h 5
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 166
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Don't disagree, but unless Seabs waives his NMC Murphy is exposed in the expansion draft. Might as well get the asset for him. WPG after last year lost their top 2 right defenseman. This way they get a serviceable top 4 defender for 1.5 years at a reasonable price. Pitt depends if they're in the hunt at the deadline, but given that the traded a top 9 winger for spare pucks to sign Jack Johnson I wouldn't put a trade like this past them.
30 déc. 2020 à 10 h 11
#4
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,585
Mentions "j'aime": 1,127
Quoting: exo2769
Hard pass on that WPG trade. Murphy is a lot better than DeHaan. I also don't think PIT does that trade for DeHaan.


Quoting: JordanCGrant
Don't disagree, but unless Seabs waives his NMC Murphy is exposed in the expansion draft. Might as well get the asset for him. WPG after last year lost their top 2 right defenseman. This way they get a serviceable top 4 defender for 1.5 years at a reasonable price. Pitt depends if they're in the hunt at the deadline, but given that the traded a top 9 winger for spare pucks to sign Jack Johnson I wouldn't put a trade like this past them.


As a pens fan, I would rather see them go for Soderberg as we need a 3C but with the way that GMJR does business... we may be overpaying for another dman grimace
exo2769 et JordanCGrant a aimé ceci.
30 déc. 2020 à 10 h 25
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,650
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Thanks nut no thanks. No need or interest.
30 déc. 2020 à 11 h 20
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 3,902
Mentions "j'aime": 1,760
1.85 million spent on goaltending...tank for sure
30 déc. 2020 à 11 h 48
#7
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Quoting: exo2769
Hard pass on that WPG trade. Murphy is a lot better than DeHaan. I also don't think PIT does that trade for DeHaan.


Quoting: JordanCGrant
Don't disagree, but unless Seabs waives his NMC Murphy is exposed in the expansion draft. Might as well get the asset for him. WPG after last year lost their top 2 right defenseman. This way they get a serviceable top 4 defender for 1.5 years at a reasonable price. Pitt depends if they're in the hunt at the deadline, but given that the traded a top 9 winger for spare pucks to sign Jack Johnson I wouldn't put a trade like this past them.


I agree Chicago should trade Murphy, but for more than a 2nd. Remember Murphy is a big, right shot defenceman, was a 1st round 20th overall pick, and plays over 20 minutes a game, and is still only 27, prime age for a defenceman. He's too old for a Chicago rebuild, but a good age to be traded.
exo2769, ChiHawk et JordanCGrant a aimé ceci.
30 déc. 2020 à 12 h 11
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Murphy is worth more then a 2nd

De Haan is not worth a 2nd, 3rd at best given his cap hit.
30 déc. 2020 à 12 h 28
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 166
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: sensibleguy
I agree Chicago should trade Murphy, but for more than a 2nd. Remember Murphy is a big, right shot defenceman, was a 1st round 20th overall pick, and plays over 20 minutes a game, and is still only 27, prime age for a defenceman. He's too old for a Chicago rebuild, but a good age to be traded.


You think you could get more than that in the flat cap? I tend to be tentative with trade values as a lot of fluctuation and variables based on team needs and situation. I think Devon Toews went for a second or two seconds. I didn't know if Murphy's value around the league would be the same as that so I probably undervalued it.
30 déc. 2020 à 12 h 29
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 166
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: ChiHawk
Murphy is worth more then a 2nd

De Haan is not worth a 2nd, 3rd at best given his cap hit.


Cap isn't the big issue with him its his health. When healthy he was our best defenseman in the regular season last year. Given his health I can understand a third, but may have overestimated his value based on his play when healthy.
30 déc. 2020 à 12 h 30
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 166
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Missouri
As a pens fan, I would rather see them go for Soderberg as we need a 3C but with the way that GMJR does business... we may be overpaying for another dman grimace


If I am Stan Bowman they would be the team I would target for a trade. JR is always win now mode and has a bad habit to overpay. Though when you have Crosby and Malkin and are less removed from winning than Chicago it makes somewhat sense to try winning one more time before the window closes.
Missouri a aimé ceci.
30 déc. 2020 à 13 h 32
#12
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,585
Mentions "j'aime": 1,127
Quoting: JordanCGrant
If I am Stan Bowman they would be the team I would target for a trade. JR is always win now mode and has a bad habit to overpay. Though when you have Crosby and Malkin and are less removed from winning than Chicago it makes somewhat sense to try winning one more time before the window closes.


Oh yeah I really don't want to rebuild. I say as long as we have Sid and Geno we will always be a playoff team. (Of course that may be my diehard fan attitude lol)
30 déc. 2020 à 13 h 34
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,607
Why exactly are the habs trading a 3rd for a guy that was a free agent this year who is a fringe 3rd liner?
30 déc. 2020 à 13 h 43
#14
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Modifié 30 déc. 2020 à 15 h 27
Quoting: JordanCGrant
You think you could get more than that in the flat cap? I tend to be tentative with trade values as a lot of fluctuation and variables based on team needs and situation. I think Devon Toews went for a second or two seconds. I didn't know if Murphy's value around the league would be the same as that so I probably undervalued it.


It's true that there is a flat cap, and Murphy's contract would be a consideration in the trade, but he's signed so his cap hit is already established. When he needs to be resigned is when the cap will come more into play. If a team can't afford the $3.85MM, then they don't trade for him. If I'm Pierre Dorion, I'm on the phone with Stan Bowman and hammering out a deal. With extra 2nd round picks and a cupboard full of prospects, a deal should be easy to be completed. Even if it's a 2nd and a B prospect, it's still more than a 2nd.
31 déc. 2020 à 0 h 0
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: JordanCGrant
Cap isn't the big issue with him its his health. When healthy he was our best defenseman in the regular season last year. Given his health I can understand a third, but may have overestimated his value based on his play when healthy.


Murphy is better then De Haan IMO. De Haan is a better puck mover but Murphy is better edge player and more physical.
31 déc. 2020 à 11 h 19
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Bruins reject on Need and Value
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage