SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Send Him Home

Créé par: kclar
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 29 déc. 2020
Publié: 29 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CHI
  1. Portillo, Erik [Liste de réserve]
  2. Quinn, Jack
  3. Reinhart, Sam
  4. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de BUF
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de BUF
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 623 814 $1 090 244 $4 200 000 $4 876 186 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
562 500 $562 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 déc. 2020 à 14 h 20
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,197
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Sabres should decline that.

If you think about it in terms of first round picks, Reinhart and Risto probably get 2 firsts in terms of combined value, Quinn is an 8th overall pick, plus 2 firsts, all for three seasons of a 32 year old Kane.
sabres89, gretzkyghosts et Jdfitz77 a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2020 à 14 h 26
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,883
Mentions "j'aime": 11,894
I think Ristolainen should be viewed as a cap dump not an asset, and even still this is extremely bad value for Buffalo.
29 déc. 2020 à 15 h 1
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,544
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
Buffalo betting the farm on a wrong side of 30 scoring winger who cant play in his own end while pulling down 10.5 aav for 3 more years as he declines?
love it
kclar et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2020 à 15 h 6
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,124
Mentions "j'aime": 6,131
Not interested if thats anything near the actual cost
kclar a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2020 à 15 h 15
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 497
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
I think Ristolainen should be viewed as a cap dump not an asset, and even still this is extremely bad value for Buffalo.


Risto would be their top RHD immediately and arguable top D all together
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2020 à 15 h 21
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,544
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
Quoting: kclar
Risto would be their top RHD immediately and arguable top D all together


that's more an insult to chicago than it is a compliment to Risto
29 déc. 2020 à 15 h 32
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,883
Mentions "j'aime": 11,894
Quoting: kclar
Risto would be their top RHD immediately and arguable top D all together


That means nothing. Erik Gudbranson is Ottawa's top RHD, that doesn't make him good.

Also it's not even true lmao. He's not better than Boqvist, and he's definitely not better than Murphy.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2020 à 16 h 2
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: kclar
Risto would be their top RHD immediately and arguable top D all together


There is no sense in discussing Ristolainen.
Too many people look at his horrible +/- from 2018-2019.
He has vastly improved.
Just ignore ignorant comments.
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2020 à 16 h 4
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,197
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: kclar
Risto would be their top RHD immediately and arguable top D all together


Keith and Murphy are both significantly better, and I'm taking Boqvist over him as well.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2020 à 16 h 31
#10
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Modifié 29 déc. 2020 à 16 h 38
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
There is no sense in discussing Ristolainen.
Too many people look at his horrible +/- from 2018-2019.
He has vastly improved.
Just ignore ignorant comments.


Quoting: kclar
Risto would be their top RHD immediately and arguable top D all together


Yeah, we aren't looking at +/- I'll tell you that for free.
Just in case you're unfamiliar with these - These are horrendously bad results for Risto.
So not only are we not basing this on outdated and bad info, Risto has actually gotten worse since the "lowpoint" you've identified. Great eye test there bud.
Ec_gwoEXoAAO6dV?format=png&name=900x900Ec_g_TFWAAAMIUR?format=png&name=smallEc_iCTGWoAIwQn3?format=jpg&name=smallEqb3OTkXYAEtPTS?format=jpg&name=small
ChiHawk et Claesson4Norris a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2020 à 19 h 6
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: kclar
Risto would be their top RHD immediately and arguable top D all together


LOL, no he wouldn't. Murphy is better then Risto all day long and the Hawks aren't sitting two of their highly valued prospects (Mitchell and Boqvist) for Risto. Murphy, Boqvist, Mitchell, then Risto would be the pecking order on the right side.
29 déc. 2020 à 19 h 31
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 497
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: Random2152
Yeah, we aren't looking at +/- I'll tell you that for free.
Just in case you're unfamiliar with these - These are horrendously bad results for Risto.
So not only are we not basing this on outdated and bad info, Risto has actually gotten worse since the "lowpoint" you've identified. Great eye test there bud.
Ec_gwoEXoAAO6dV?format=png&name=900x900Ec_g_TFWAAAMIUR?format=png&name=smallEc_iCTGWoAIwQn3?format=jpg&name=smallEqb3OTkXYAEtPTS?format=jpg&name=small


Put Boqvist/Murphy in RR's position last season/few seasons and I'm sure his possession numbers would be as bad or worse
29 déc. 2020 à 19 h 42
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Quoting: Random2152
Yeah, we aren't looking at +/- I'll tell you that for free.
Just in case you're unfamiliar with these - These are horrendously bad results for Risto.


Those are based off the competition he faces and team he plays with. Risto has some of the toughest minutes in the NHL. He's not replacement level as the numbers would indicate. You need to take analytics with a grain of salt. Relying on them completely is lazy
Morons a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2020 à 20 h 16
#14
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: OlegP
Those are based off the competition he faces and team he plays with. Risto has some of the toughest minutes in the NHL. He's not replacement level as the numbers would indicate. You need to take analytics with a grain of salt. Relying on them completely is lazy


Quoting: kclar
Put Boqvist/Murphy in RR's position last season/few seasons and I'm sure his possession numbers would be as bad or worse


It always amazes me that the first response is always something that is accounted for and even says it is accounted for in big bold letters. Its like you didn't even bother looking.
There are legitimate criticisms of analytics, these are not some of them. please dont parrot these uniformed takes like they prove anything.
29 déc. 2020 à 20 h 30
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 497
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: Random2152
It always amazes me that the first response is always something that is accounted for and even says it is accounted for in big bold letters. Its like you didn't even bother looking.
There are legitimate criticisms of analytics, these are not some of them. please dont parrot these uniformed takes like they prove anything.


I understand that they're taken into account but its not a 100% science, probably never will be. Just as ignoring analytics completely isn't smart, following analytics and treating them as the complete accurate value of a player is also lazy
OlegP a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2020 à 21 h 35
#16
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Modifié 29 déc. 2020 à 21 h 41
Quoting: kclar
I understand that they're taken into account but its not a 100% science, probably never will be. Just as ignoring analytics completely isn't smart, following analytics and treating them as the complete accurate value of a player is also lazy


This implies that an eye test is somehow 100% accurate, or even better than the analytics at doing this when all research points in exactly the opposite direction. Don't let the good be the enemy of the perfect. It isn't perfect, but it is one of the best tools we have and it is damn good. That is no reason to discount it.

Plus, any good eye test will tell you Risto ****ing sucks lol. Remember that analytics are just what happens on the ice written down and presented in an "easy" to digest way. No one ever argued you should only use analytics, only you brought that up. You're moving the goalposts in this conversation and bringing up irrelevant points to distract from the argument whether it is intentional or not.

I think what I am trying to say, to put it more succinctly is that nothing you have said here discredits or invalidates anything these models say. Risto is bad. One of the worst Dmen in the league and there isn't a good argument otherwise, just like there isn't a good argument against analytics.
29 déc. 2020 à 22 h 15
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Quoting: Random2152
This implies that an eye test is somehow 100% accurate, or even better than the analytics at doing this when all research points in exactly the opposite direction. Don't let the good be the enemy of the perfect. It isn't perfect, but it is one of the best tools we have and it is damn good. That is no reason to discount it.

Plus, any good eye test will tell you Risto ****ing sucks lol. Remember that analytics are just what happens on the ice written down and presented in an "easy" to digest way. No one ever argued you should only use analytics, only you brought that up. You're moving the goalposts in this conversation and bringing up irrelevant points to distract from the argument whether it is intentional or not.

I think what I am trying to say, to put it more succinctly is that nothing you have said here discredits or invalidates anything these models say. Risto is bad. One of the worst Dmen in the league and there isn't a good argument otherwise, just like there isn't a good argument against analytics.


Quoting: Random2152
It always amazes me that the first response is always something that is accounted for and even says it is accounted for in big bold letters. Its like you didn't even bother looking.
There are legitimate criticisms of analytics, these are not some of them. please dont parrot these uniformed takes like they prove anything.


what are you talking about. Analytics are a thing. no one said they weren't a thing and you haven't said anything remotely relevant to Risto's play on the ice besides a chart that doesn't actually prove anything
kclar et Morons a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2020 à 22 h 27
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 497
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: Random2152
This implies that an eye test is somehow 100% accurate, or even better than the analytics at doing this when all research points in exactly the opposite direction. Don't let the good be the enemy of the perfect. It isn't perfect, but it is one of the best tools we have and it is damn good. That is no reason to discount it.

Plus, any good eye test will tell you Risto ****ing sucks lol. Remember that analytics are just what happens on the ice written down and presented in an "easy" to digest way. No one ever argued you should only use analytics, only you brought that up. You're moving the goalposts in this conversation and bringing up irrelevant points to distract from the argument whether it is intentional or not.

I think what I am trying to say, to put it more succinctly is that nothing you have said here discredits or invalidates anything these models say. Risto is bad. One of the worst Dmen in the league and there isn't a good argument otherwise, just like there isn't a good argument against analytics.


what you're trying to say is that you're smarter than an NHL coach. If you average 22 minutes a night, I can guarantee you that player isn't the worst in the league.
29 déc. 2020 à 22 h 28
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Quoting: kclar
what you're trying to say is that you're smarter than an NHL coach. If you average 22 minutes a night, I can guarantee you that player isn't the worst in the league.


I am always one year ahead of the general public - so I get a lot of hate and no credit.

Thats his bio. Enough said. Another one that can copy/paste charts and thinks he knows more than others like a teenager running an anime podcast... is how I envision these people
Morons a aimé ceci.
30 déc. 2020 à 1 h 43
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 5,120
Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
Quoting: leafs101
Sabres should decline that.

If you think about it in terms of first round picks, Reinhart and Risto probably get 2 firsts in terms of combined value, Quinn is an 8th overall pick, plus 2 firsts, all for three seasons of a 32 year old Kane.


^this

STOP these Kane to Buffalo trades, he’s a bad fit
30 déc. 2020 à 11 h 8
#21
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: kclar
what you're trying to say is that you're smarter than an NHL coach. If you average 22 minutes a night, I can guarantee you that player isn't the worst in the league.


A blind appeal to authority and the toi fallacy that has been disproven time after time again.
Wow.

If you ever decide to actually learn a thing or two about why many of the preconceived notions in hockey are wrong (and how analytics helps to cut through them) i am more than happy to help you understand them. But you will actually need a willingness to learn and to understand that you are not infallible.
Good day.
30 déc. 2020 à 11 h 12
#22
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: OlegP
what are you talking about. Analytics are a thing. no one said they weren't a thing and you haven't said anything remotely relevant to Risto's play on the ice besides a chart that doesn't actually prove anything



Quoting: OlegP
I am always one year ahead of the general public - so I get a lot of hate and no credit.

Thats his bio. Enough said. Another one that can copy/paste charts and thinks he knows more than others like a teenager running an anime podcast... is how I envision these people



You know, if you were actually able to make a cognizant point or criticism on analytics there'd be a conversation here, but everything you've said in this thread is akin to "nuh uhh". So I will ask you very simply.

Why doesn't this chart prove anything.

Be (and I cannot stress this enough) specific and be concise.

If all you need is help understanding exactly what it says or means, just say so as I am more than happy to help.
30 déc. 2020 à 11 h 34
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 497
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: Random2152
A blind appeal to authority and the toi fallacy that has been disproven time after time again.
Wow.

If you ever decide to actually learn a thing or two about why many of the preconceived notions in hockey are wrong (and how analytics helps to cut through them) i am more than happy to help you understand them. But you will actually need a willingness to learn and to understand that you are not infallible.
Good day.


nobody's out to get you dude, just take it easy.

NHL teams use analytics. my point is, if you're head coach of any team, you play the players who give you the best chance to win. to think that the coaches at the highest level have no idea what they are doing is wacky.
30 déc. 2020 à 11 h 56
#24
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: kclar
nobody's out to get you dude, just take it easy.

NHL teams use analytics. my point is, if you're head coach of any team, you play the players who give you the best chance to win. to think that the coaches at the highest level have no idea what they are doing is wacky.


And yet they continue to play Risto 22 mins a night despite all the evidence in the world saying its a bad idea.
Coaches - like you and me - are not infallable.
Case in point: Babcock playing Marleau over Matthews in the dying minutes of game 7 when we needed a goal.
30 déc. 2020 à 12 h 7
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 497
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: Random2152
And yet they continue to play Risto 22 mins a night despite all the evidence in the world saying its a bad idea.
Coaches - like you and me - are not infallable.
Case in point: Babcock playing Marleau over Matthews in the dying minutes of game 7 when we needed a goal.


i respect where you're coming from and I understand what you are saying. i just think its unfair to try to simplify the game to "this player is better than another" it completely misses so many nuances/skills/uses/aspects of players, let alone player development.

i agree that coaches should experiment more when they see trends like risto's. call it a "blind appeal" all you want, but i think someone who spends every day with these players would know a bit more than us. not saying they don't make mistakes, but how would you handle it?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage