SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Whatever it would take I say do it

Créé par: CMac66
Équipe: 2020-21 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 25 déc. 2020
Publié: 25 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CAR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
3.
CAR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de LAK
Logo de STL
2022
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
2023
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $80 248 989 $1 367 073 $3 150 000 $1 251 011 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 460 250 $8 460 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 déc. 2020 à 16 h 5
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,676
Mentions "j'aime": 24,592
I don't disagree with the value, but I just don't see us trading John Gibson.

If someone told me that we HAD traded John, without telling me what we'd got in return, I would hope that it was at least this good a package.
Stgstg55, SevenLeg et CMac66 a aimé ceci.
25 déc. 2020 à 16 h 18
#2
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
I completely agree with my colleague @OldNYIfan
Value is practically perfect and what the Ducks would most likely ask for. But I just can’t see Ducks be willing to move Gibson any time soon.
SevenLeg et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 déc. 2020 à 16 h 18
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,488
Mentions "j'aime": 521
Please point to goalie who has ever held the trade value of essentially 3 1st rd picks plus roster players or one who has ever returned such a package.

Gibson is a great goalie, but the fact is goalies just do not return the insane amount of value you have coming from the Canes in such a trade.
25 déc. 2020 à 16 h 19
#4
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,552
Mentions "j'aime": 12,308
If I'm Carolina I'd do this without Necas, could substitute something else in if necessary.
CMac66 a aimé ceci.
25 déc. 2020 à 17 h 7
#5
Démarrer sujet
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 541
@OldNYIfan @HadesOfSoCal

I don't really see the Ducks trading him either. However, I think it should be considered because by the time they will be competitive again Gibson will probably be 29 or 30. Not only that but he will probably steal some games too making them respectable but not bottom 5. So if the Ducks could add a couple legitimate pieces in a Gibson trade, they will probably bottom out and have a pretty good rebuild in the next 2 years. That's why I see the Canes as a good trade partner seeing that they have some good young pieces and can afford to make a big trade for, imo, their only position of need.

Definitely a tough call to make as a GM, but timing is everything and the team doesn't seem to be lining up with the goalie. If I was a Ducks fan, (which I was in the Kariya days!) I would have a hard time trading Gibson, but I could understand the plan if the trade got back some decent young players.
25 déc. 2020 à 17 h 12
#6
Démarrer sujet
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
If I'm Carolina I'd do this without Necas, could substitute something else in if necessary.


Well yeah lol, so would I! The canes have so many good prospects but I have no idea what B. Murray would want to get him to do it. I imagine it would be a big trade though. Could change the 1st to a 2nd or Necas for Suzuki.
MisstheWhalers et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 déc. 2020 à 17 h 23
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,665
Mentions "j'aime": 406
Anaheim GM gives you a monthly million dollars just to make sure you aren't joking.
25 déc. 2020 à 17 h 32
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,676
Mentions "j'aime": 24,592
Quoting: spockrock
Please point to goalie who has ever held the trade value of essentially 3 1st rd picks plus roster players or one who has ever returned such a package.

Gibson is a great goalie, but the fact is goalies just do not return the insane amount of value you have coming from the Canes in such a trade.


No such comparable exist because no one in the recent modern era trades franchise goalies.
CMac66 a aimé ceci.
25 déc. 2020 à 17 h 51
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,676
Mentions "j'aime": 24,592
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
If I'm Carolina I'd do this without Necas, could substitute something else in if necessary.


Necas is the only reason Anaheim would even consider this trade. Nedeljkovic is only a prospect, although a good one, as is Fleury, and Mrazek is in there only for cap equivalence purposes.
25 déc. 2020 à 18 h 1
#10
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,676
Mentions "j'aime": 24,592
Quoting: spockrock
Please point to goalie who has ever held the trade value of essentially 3 1st rd picks plus roster players or one who has ever returned such a package.

Gibson is a great goalie, but the fact is goalies just do not return the insane amount of value you have coming from the Canes in such a trade.


Because the four first-round picks could turn out to be Duncan Siemens (11th OA), Sven Baertschi (13th OA), Mark McNeill (18th OA), and Tyler Biggs (22nd OA), the last of whom has a certain resonance in this context.
25 déc. 2020 à 18 h 10
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,488
Mentions "j'aime": 521
Quoting: OldNYIfan
No such comparable exist because no one in the recent modern era trades franchise goalies.


Or...more likely, goalies just don’t carry that sort of value
25 déc. 2020 à 18 h 27
#12
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,552
Mentions "j'aime": 12,308
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Necas is the only reason Anaheim would even consider this trade. Nedeljkovic is only a prospect, although a good one, as is Fleury, and Mrazek is in there only for cap equivalence purposes.


I'm more thinking it'd be a 1st, Nedeljkovic, Bean, Foegele, Mrazek for Gibson
25 déc. 2020 à 19 h 46
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,965
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: OldNYIfan
No such comparable exist because no one in the recent modern era trades franchise goalies.


Roberto Luongo
26 déc. 2020 à 5 h 11
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: spockrock
Please point to goalie who has ever held the trade value of essentially 3 1st rd picks plus roster players or one who has ever returned such a package.

Gibson is a great goalie, but the fact is goalies just do not return the insane amount of value you have coming from the Canes in such a trade.


You want a great goaltender but you don't want to pay for him. Fleury is a slow-developing 3rd-pairing d-man. Nedeljkovic had one good year on a strong AHL team.
At least Necas has shown some potential from playing 2nd-line minutes, but he'll never be a Elias Pettersson type of player - so why would Anaheim make that trade?
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
26 déc. 2020 à 7 h 59
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,488
Mentions "j'aime": 521
Quoting: davidrabbit
You want a great goaltender but you don't want to pay for him. Fleury is a slow-developing 3rd-pairing d-man. Nedeljkovic had one good year on a strong AHL team.
At least Necas has shown some potential from playing 2nd-line minutes, but he'll never be a Elias Pettersson type of player - so why would Anaheim make that trade?


A few points;

-I didn’t make the trade proposal.

-Gibson is a fine goalie, but no team would or has ever paid such a price for a goalie, which is basically my point. The best at that position just doesn’t hold that much value.

-I don’t really give a rip how Necas would fit in with ANH. To expect a roster player like him, plus the equivalent of 2 more 1st round picks ++ for a goalie is ridiculous.
27 déc. 2020 à 11 h 38
#16
Démarrer sujet
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Quoting: spockrock
A few points;

-I didn’t make the trade proposal.

-Gibson is a fine goalie, but no team would or has ever paid such a price for a goalie, which is basically my point. The best at that position just doesn’t hold that much value.

-I don’t really give a rip how Necas would fit in with ANH. To expect a roster player like him, plus the equivalent of 2 more 1st round picks ++ for a goalie is ridiculous.


and @davidrabbit

I think the notion of 'equivalent of 2 more 1st round picks' is a common way to look at players but a mistake. Once they're drafted, their draft position really doesn't matter after 2-3 years sometimes after 1 year. Once they're picked, they don't hold the value of the pick, they hold the value of the player that they are. Any GM hanging to 'where they were drafted' years after should never be a GM.

Fleury and Necas were players that were drafted 6 and 3 years ago. Hanging onto Fleury being a 1st round pick as a basis in value doesn't make sense. Hell Sanderson was just take 5th by the Sens and I doubt they could get '5th' overall value for him. Lundell was taken 12th and I'd pay more for him than Sanderson.

The value in the trade I proposed is in the 1st round pick and Necas. Fleury still has potential but time is running out and Nedeljkovic is coming into his prime as a goalie and could be a starter or could not be. That's a lot of risk for Anaheim with Necas being the best but still unknown player in the trade. So that's why I added the 1st.
OldNYIfan et davidrabbit a aimé ceci.
27 déc. 2020 à 14 h 6
#17
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,676
Mentions "j'aime": 24,592
Quoting: CMac66
I think the notion of 'equivalent of 2 more 1st round picks' is a common way to look at players but a mistake. Once they're drafted, their draft position really doesn't matter after 2-3 years sometimes after 1 year. Once they're picked, they don't hold the value of the pick, they hold the value of the player that they are. Any GM hanging to 'where they were drafted' years after should never be a GM.

Fleury and Necas were players that were drafted 6 and 3 years ago. Hanging onto Fleury being a 1st round pick as a basis in value doesn't make sense. Hell Sanderson was just take 5th by the Sens and I doubt they could get '5th' overall value for him. Lundell was taken 12th and I'd pay more for him than Sanderson.

The value in the trade I proposed is in the 1st round pick and Necas. Fleury still has potential but time is running out and Nedeljkovic is coming into his prime as a goalie and could be a starter or could not be. That's a lot of risk for Anaheim with Necas being the best but still unknown player in the trade. So that's why I added the 1st.


It's difficult to make the argument that there is any significant difference between Haydn Fleury (taken high in 2014) and Jacob Larsson (taken low in the first the following year), who's already on the Anaheim roster. Larsson has played 113 games in the NHL and Fleury only 19 more, and their offensive and defensive capabilities, so far, seem pretty equal. You're absolutely right -- arguing that either one is worth a first-round pick now is ludicrous, and your trade is pretty much right on value (although I wouldn't do it, personally).
CMac66 et davidrabbit a aimé ceci.
28 déc. 2020 à 8 h 36
#18
Démarrer sujet
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Quoting: OldNYIfan
It's difficult to make the argument that there is any significant difference between Haydn Fleury (taken high in 2014) and Jacob Larsson (taken low in the first the following year), who's already on the Anaheim roster. Larsson has played 113 games in the NHL and Fleury only 19 more, and their offensive and defensive capabilities, so far, seem pretty equal. You're absolutely right -- arguing that either one is worth a first-round pick now is ludicrous, and your trade is pretty much right on value (although I wouldn't do it, personally).


Great point. I was thinking about Larsson too after I revisited the trade. Fleury would seem redundant. Thanks for the thoughts!
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage