SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A Penguins Prospect Pyramid even though we dont have very many

Créé par: Pens3lieve
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 15 déc. 2020
Publié: 24 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
A Penguins Prospect Pyramid even though we dont have very many...

So the prospects are ranked below (kind of) by position although I flipped some LWers over to the right side to balance it out a bit...

but I will give a couple other ratings and thoughts.
(forgive me if I don't know alot about these guys...)

Class A Prospects: Top prospects any team would like to have.
W, Poulin, A-, Top-6


Class B Prospects: I think these guys will eventually get a shot in the NHL
LD, Joseph, B+, Top-4
RW, Legare, B-, Mid-6
RD, Maniscalco, B-, Top-6
LW, O'Connor, B-, Mid-6


Class C Prospects: Starting to get into the "if everything goes right we'll see in a couple years" guys.
LW, Bjorkvist, C+, Bot-6
LW, Gruden, C+, Mid-6
LD, Lee, C+, Top-6
G, Blomqvist, C+ #1A

F, Lafferty, C, Bot-6
LD, Phillips, C, Top-6
RD, Reilly, C, Top-6
G, Clang, C, #1B

LW, Miletec, C-, Bot-6
F, Almeida, C-, Bot-6
C, Angello, C-, Bot-6
C, Bellerive, C-, Bot-6
G, Larmi, C-, #1B


Class D (the loooong shots/it would probably take a miracle)
W, Puustinen, D+, Bot-6
W, Zohorna, D+, 4th line
LW, Ansons, D+, depth

W, Drozg, D, 4th line
LD, Almari, D, 7th D
C, Caulfield, D, depth
RD, Lindgren, D, 7th D

C, Svejkovsky, D-, minor
RD, Airola, D-, minor
G, D'Orio, D-, depth
C, Yoder, D-, minor

Your thoughts? anyone I badly misjudged???
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3700 000 $
3700 000 $
3700 000 $
3700 000 $
3700 000 $
3700 000 $
3700 000 $
3700 000 $
3700 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2981 500 000 $25 589 583 $0 $2 185 000 $55 910 417 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
894 167 $894 167 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
733 333 $733 333 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
795 000 $795 000 $
AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
788 333 $788 333 $ (Bonis de performance42 500 $$42K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
853 333 $853 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
806 250 $806 250 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
733 333 $733 333 $
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 déc. 2020 à 7 h 53
#1
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,978
Mentions "j'aime": 1,466
24 déc. 2020 à 9 h 28
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Anaheim accepts
24 déc. 2020 à 10 h 40
#3
Hockey God Genius
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,260
Mentions "j'aime": 810
Im a big Phillips fan, every time I've watched him play in College... I see NHL potential plus he can skate
Bjorkqvist will be a 4th liner in NHL, he just works to hard not to make it
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
24 déc. 2020 à 12 h 18
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
our centers suck.
Pens3lieve et Sidstick87 a aimé ceci.
24 déc. 2020 à 15 h 43
#5
NoWah49
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,863
Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
I don't see Poulin that high, but he definitely is our best prospect
Eddy et gmgb a aimé ceci.
24 déc. 2020 à 17 h 38
#6
Hockey God Genius
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,260
Mentions "j'aime": 810
Quoting: pharrow
our centers suck.


The Pens last Center prospect was Sid, lol
Pens3lieve et pharrow a aimé ceci.
28 déc. 2020 à 14 h 16
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Modifié 28 déc. 2020 à 17 h 43
PO-Joseph is an A- prospect. A top 100 prospect on any top 100 list out there.

Poulin is an “A” prospect.

I agree Legare, O’Connor and Maniscalco are all “B-“ prospect. Legare might be a “B” b/c of his NHL level shot.

I would put Blomqvist, Clang, Lee, Lafferty all at “C+”. I would have Angello, Gruden, Bjorkqvist, Almeida, Svejkovsky, Caulfield(both Svejkovsky and Caulfield were invited to the WJ try-outs for team USA. Both were one of 38 players invited; they are young, a long way to go, but both have NHL potential. Just being invited to the WJ try-outs means something) all at “C” prospects.

The biggest error IMO is Puustinen. He’s a top 6 potential. He’s another “B-“, “C+” prospect. He’s a top 6 or bust type of prospect. A scoring winger. Killing it in Liiga, against men. He’s a little, 5’9, 5’10, scoring winger. Like I said, a top 6 player or bust.


https://www.pensburgh.com/2020/11/6/21551664/pensburgh-top-25-under-25-11-valtteri-puustinen

https://primetimesportstalk.com/2020/04/18/pittsburgh-penguins-big-3-prospect-report/

https://dobberprospects.com/2020/12/23/december-31-in-31-pittsburgh-penguins/

Copy and paste these articles and read up on him alittle more. The 2nd article has him as our 3rd best prospect.

I would rank the Pens prospects, Poulin, PO-Joseph, Legare, Maniscalco, O’Connor, Puustinen, C.Lee, Blomqvist, Clang, Bjorkqvist, J.Caulfield, Svejkovsky, Gruden, J.Almeida, Bellerive, Zohorna.

Lafferty and Angello are graduated from prospect to NHL players, bottom 6 players. Both good two-way players that can chip in scoring some.

I don’t have much faith at all in Reilly, Phillips, Almari. I think all 3 are career AHL d-men. NHL depth, injury call-ups at best.

I do like E.Larmi though. I would put him as a “C”, “C-“ prospect. I think he’s a future NHL back-up. Or AHL stater, 3rd goalie in the organization type at worst.

Puustinen is way too low though. If he makes the NHL. He’ll be a top 6 winger and Be a 2nd PP player.
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
28 déc. 2020 à 17 h 31
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Modifié 28 déc. 2020 à 17 h 42
Quoting: PGHBOB69
PO-Joseph is an A- prospect. A top 100 prospect on any top 100 list out there.

Poulin is an “A” prospect.

I agree Legare, O’Connor and Maniscalco are all “B-“ prospect. Legare might be a “B” b/c of his NHL level shot.

I would put Blomqvist, Clang, Lee, Lafferty all at “C+”. I would have Angello, Gruden, Bjorkqvist, Almeida, Svejkovsky, Caulfield(both Svejkovsky and Caulfield were invited to the WJ try-outs for team USA. Both were one of 38 players invited; they are young, a long way to go, but both have NHL potential. Just being invited to the WJ try-outs means something) all at “C” prospects.

The biggest error IMO is Puustinen. He’s a top 6 potential. He’s another “B-“, “C+” prospect. He’s a top 6 or bust type of prospect. A scoring winger. Killing it in Liiga, against men. He’s a little, 5’9, 5’10, scoring winger. Like I said, a top 6 player or bust.


https://www.pensburgh.com/2020/11/6/21551664/pensburgh-top-25-under-25-11-valtteri-puustinen

https://primetimesportstalk.com/2020/04/18/pittsburgh-penguins-big-3-prospect-report/

https://dobberprospects.com/2020/12/23/december-31-in-31-pittsburgh-penguins/

Copy and paste these articles and read up on him alittle more. The 2nd article has him as our 3rd best prospect.

I would rank the Pens prospects, Poulin, PO-Joseph, Legare, Maniscalco, O’Connor, Puustinen, C.Lee, Blomqvist, Clang, Bjorkqvist, J.Caulfield, Svejkovsky, Gruden, J.Almeida, Bellerive, Zohorna.

Lafferty and Angello are graduated from prospect to NHL players, bottom 6 players. Both good two-way players that can chip in scoring some.

I don’t have much faith at all in Reilly, Phillips, Almari. I think all 3 are career AHL d-men. NHL depth, injury call-ups at best.

I do like E.Larmi though. I would put him as a “C”, “C-“ prospect. I think he’s a future NHL back-up. Or AHL stater, 3rd goalie in the organization type at worst.

Puustinen is way too low though. If he makes the NHL. He’ll be a top 6 winger and Be a 2nd PP player.


@Pens3lieve

https://www.pensburgh.com/2020/11/20/21575860/pensburgh-top-25-under-25-1-john-marino-penguins-best-young-players

Here’s another article/list that has him right behind Maniscalco and ahead of Blomqvist, Bjorkqvist and Clang. Lafferty is 25 years old, and not on this List. But Puustinen would still be ahead of Lafferty too IMO.

Again: I’d go;

Poulin “A”
PO-Joseph “A-“(a top 100 prospect on any list out there)
Legare “B”

OConnor, Maniscalco, Puustinen “B-“

Blomqvist, Clang, C.Lee, Lafferty “C+”

Bjorkqvist, Angello, Svejkovsky, C.Caulfield, Almeida, E.Larmi, Bellerive, S.Miletic, R.Zohorna “C”

Anything less than that would be a “C-“ or a “D”. Very doubtful NHL future.
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
28 déc. 2020 à 17 h 41
#9
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,978
Mentions "j'aime": 1,466
Quoting: PGHBOB69
@Pens3lieve

https://www.pensburgh.com/2020/11/20/21575860/pensburgh-top-25-under-25-1-john-marino-penguins-best-young-players

Here’s another article/list that has him right behind Maniscalco and ahead of Blomqvist, Bjorkqvist and Clang. Lafferty is 25 years old, and not on this List. But Puustinen would still be ahead of Lafferty too IMO.

Again: I’d go;

Poulin “A”
PO-Joseph “A-“(a top 100 prospect on any list out there)
Legare “B”

OConnor, Maniscalco, Puustinen “B-“

Blomqvist, Clang, C.Lee, Lafferty “C+”

Bjorkqvist, Angello, Svejkovsky, C.Caulfield, Almeida, E.Larmi, Bellerive, R.Zohorna “C”

Anything less than that would be a “C-“ or a “D”. Very doubtful NHL future.


thx for the feedback!
PGHBOB69 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage