SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Patching Things Up With The Canes

Créé par: Campabee
Équipe: 2020-21 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 18 déc. 2020
Publié: 22 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CAR
  1. Armia, Joel
  2. Byron, Paul
  3. Poehling, Ryan
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
I think this could work as a base. Let me know whay you think should be added. I see this breaking down as

Byron>Niederreiter (strickly due to cap hit otherwise they would be =)
Bokk=Poehling
Armia + 2nd + difference in Byron/Niederreiter cap = Jarvis
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
CHI
  1. Weal, Jordan
Détails additionnels:
Any team
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $73 854 642 $0 $3 137 500 $7 645 358 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
735 000 $735 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
771 666 $771 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
737 500 $737 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 déc. 2020 à 1 h 55
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,918
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Jeeze that is lopsided
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2020 à 2 h 0
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Jeeze that is lopsided


How so? I thought of taking someone other than Jarvis but we don't need anymore D prospects. Armia is worth a 2nd. I thought about Suzuki as well but was unsure that Canes fans would like that. I am open to adjusting as I wasn't sure about the addition of Jarvis.
22 déc. 2020 à 2 h 4
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Jeeze that is lopsided


BTW the base I was referring to was

Byron + Armia + Poehling + 2nd for Niederreiter + Bokk + ?
22 déc. 2020 à 2 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Jeeze that is lopsided


Very lopsided. Idk how he could seriously justify byron over Nino LOL.

Nino > Byron
Bokk > Armia
Jarvis > Poehling

The second doesn’t close any gaps here.
22 déc. 2020 à 2 h 5
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
I’d rather have Jarvis and Bokk than everything else combined tbh. Plus Nino is better than Byron
mhockey91, Radu47 et dvnnyr a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2020 à 2 h 6
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Alfie11
I’d rather have Jarvis and Bokk than everything else combined tbh. Plus Nino is better than Byron


Yup! 100% no doubt
Alfie11 a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2020 à 2 h 10
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: Alfie11
I’d rather have Jarvis and Bokk than everything else combined tbh. Plus Nino is better than Byron


Poehling is a good prospect and is a center which I have heard is what the Canes are looking for. Again I was hesitant to add Jarvis because he is such a good prospect but had to add something from Canes side. I disagree about Nino vs Byron I think if they had similar cap hits they would be equal value. Nino hasn't put up consistent numbers over his career. Say we took out Jarvis what would the Canes add to balance the deal?
22 déc. 2020 à 3 h 39
#8
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
If CAR were cap constrained contenders (ayy an alliteration) and it was Gunler in lieu of Jarvis, maybe, but with Seth going 13th in a historically good draft...

Nino a generational possession player as well

Honestly I'm not sure how to repair this deal
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2020 à 8 h 9
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,488
Mentions "j'aime": 521
You honestly think this is fair for CAR? You don’t use a prospect like Seth Jarvis to dump cap. The Canes aren’t Chicago.

I’d rather keep Niederreiter and Bokk too over Byron and Poehkkng, just a downright awful proposal.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2020 à 10 h 1
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: spockrock
You honestly think this is fair for CAR? You don’t use a prospect like Seth Jarvis to dump cap. The Canes aren’t Chicago.

I’d rather keep Niederreiter and Bokk too over Byron and Poehkkng, just a downright awful proposal.


I never said anyone was a cap dump. All players in the proposal on both sides are good players. Also I did say above that I was hesitant to add Jarvis I just wasn't sure who else to add. I kind of figured that there would be pushback when I added Jarvis. If you were willing to add Gunler instead of Jarvis to the package then it could still work. Also Armia is just as good possession wise as Nino so you are not really losing Ninos possession metrics. Byron adds speed and is a great PK'er, he is was a consistent 20 goal player up until his injury this season (was on pace for 4-20 goal seasons in a row before his injury). Poehling is going to get lost in our Center depth especially if Danault resigns (which I think he will).
22 déc. 2020 à 18 h 4
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,488
Mentions "j'aime": 521
Quoting: Campabee
I never said anyone was a cap dump. All players in the proposal on both sides are good players. Also I did say above that I was hesitant to add Jarvis I just wasn't sure who else to add. I kind of figured that there would be pushback when I added Jarvis. If you were willing to add Gunler instead of Jarvis to the package then it could still work. Also Armia is just as good possession wise as Nino so you are not really losing Ninos possession metrics. Byron adds speed and is a great PK'er, he is was a consistent 20 goal player up until his injury this season (was on pace for 4-20 goal seasons in a row before his injury). Poehling is going to get lost in our Center depth especially if Danault resigns (which I think he will).


Proposal is still **** for the Canes. Your attempt to justify it is worse.
22 déc. 2020 à 18 h 16
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: spockrock
Proposal is still **** for the Canes. Your attempt to justify it is worse.


I wasn't Justifying it, I was agreeing with the addition of Jarvis being too much and trying to find out if Gunler in his place would be better.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage