SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

BRENT BURNS REQUESTS TRADE TO LEAFS

Créé par: TML_Tika
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 21 déc. 2020
Publié: 21 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Burns, Brent (3 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 426 408 $0 $0 $2 073 592 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 280 000 $2 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
874 125 $874 125 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 déc. 2020 à 20 h 12
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
no offence to brent burns, but he's getting old, got term on his deal, and is not really a big minutes, defensive dman that we'd be looking for
Barilko14 a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2020 à 20 h 15
#2
Voice of unreason
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 319
Mentions "j'aime": 128
Doesn't make sense for either team
21 déc. 2020 à 20 h 15
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,270
Mentions "j'aime": 443
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
no offence to brent burns, but he's getting old, got term on his deal, and is not really a big minutes, defensive dman that we'd be looking for


Take another look at our top 4 defenceman again for me........the Canadiens had the Big 3 in the seventies.....I do not think any team in the NHL could put up a stronger Big 4 ......Burns still has lots of gas in the tank.
21 déc. 2020 à 20 h 18
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: TML_Tika
Take another look at our top 4 defenceman again for me........the Canadiens had the Big 3 in the seventies.....I do not think any team in the NHL could put up a stronger Big 4 ......Burns still has lots of gas in the tank.


yeah but burns is one of the worst defensive players in the NHL. He puts up a LOT of points, is great offensively etc., but we already have rielly. We need defensively responsible dmen, not more point-producing guys.

also this scenario would see us having burns' $5M AAV on the books when he's like 39-40 years old in the same year matthews/nylander are up for extension. that would be an unmitigated disaster for us, we don't want any contracts to get in the way of keeping those guys, let alone a 40 year old dman
Barilko14 et palhal a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2020 à 20 h 18
#5
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,230
Sj not retaining for that package
21 déc. 2020 à 20 h 24
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,270
Mentions "j'aime": 443
Quoting: Birtle34
Sj not retaining for that package


San Jose is not going to get a better deal from any team in the NHL......they can then trade off Kerfoot and Holl for draft picks and get on with their rebuild.
leafs_and_devils a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2020 à 20 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,544
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
and the leafs say neat, no thanks
21 déc. 2020 à 21 h 1
#8
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
YOU CANT GET WHATEVER YOU WANT FOR HOLL AND KERFOOT THIS ISNT HOW IT WORKS
21 déc. 2020 à 21 h 2
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 249
okay wait. i wouldn't mind this. with a legit responsible defenseman in muzz, burns is free. that pairing is lethal and would tear up the league. you know what, screw it. let's do it. they might ask to add a second to the package though, which quite frankly i wouldn't mind.
TML_Tika a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2020 à 21 h 3
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
yeah but burns is one of the worst defensive players in the NHL. He puts up a LOT of points, is great offensively etc., but we already have rielly. We need defensively responsible dmen, not more point-producing guys.

also this scenario would see us having burns' $5M AAV on the books when he's like 39-40 years old in the same year matthews/nylander are up for extension. that would be an unmitigated disaster for us, we don't want any contracts to get in the way of keeping those guys, let alone a 40 year old dman


your point on burns being offensive - he'll play with muzzin, so it's all good.
TML_Tika a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2020 à 21 h 11
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: leafs_RtheBest
your point on burns being offensive - he'll play with muzzin, so it's all good.


where have I heard that before .......

tyson-barrie-2020-38.jpg
leafs_and_devils et DartGuy86 a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2020 à 21 h 12
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
where have I heard that before .......

tyson-barrie-2020-38.jpg


okay that was funny good point. but burns is more physical and more proven throughout his career than barrie was. but yes, you have a point.
chungus a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2020 à 21 h 23
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,270
Mentions "j'aime": 443
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
where have I heard that before .......

tyson-barrie-2020-38.jpg


Wait....are you comparing Burns who has played for Team Canada with Barrie???..........Trading for Burns is the type of high reward trade the Leafs need to make to win a Cup.......It is same type of deal that the Raptors pulled off to get Kawi and we all know how well that turned out for Toronto.
21 déc. 2020 à 21 h 37
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,270
Mentions "j'aime": 443
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
no offence to brent burns, but he's getting old, got term on his deal, and is not really a big minutes, defensive dman that we'd be looking for


I also think Burns can play defense when necessary.....people are writing him off playing on a good team.
21 déc. 2020 à 21 h 37
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: TML_Tika
Wait....are you comparing Burns who has played for Team Canada with Barrie???..........Trading for Burns is the type of high reward trade the Leafs need to make to win a Cup.......It is same type of deal that the Raptors pulled off to get Kawi and we all know how well that turned out for Toronto.


burns is better ofc, but they are both offensive minded, powerplay quarterbacking dmen
522e7cdde9046f421e39a126ac189d39.png

we need guys who are responsible defensively, and not absolute liabilities in their own end

barrie was a great skater, zone entry guy, solid passer, great shot, good offensive zone IQ - not as good as burns, but in the same dimension as him. Difference was he was awful defensively, just like burns

we don't need a $5M aav dman to score goals, we need a $5M aav dman to block shots, penalty kill, and be responsible in his own end at 5v5

similar to barrie, burns is a great, skilled, talented dman, but a terrible fit for the leafs
Barilko14 a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2020 à 21 h 43
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Sharks very much consider if the retention is less.
TML_Tika a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2020 à 1 h 0
#17
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,230
Quoting: TML_Tika
San Jose is not going to get a better deal from any team in the NHL......they can then trade off Kerfoot and Holl for draft picks and get on with their rebuild.

Sj not paying 15 million for him to play against them, another year or two possibly, or they do that 3/4 more times, and even a 5 year plan doesn’t work, with 10 million ish of bad money against the books.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2020 à 2 h 7
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,270
Mentions "j'aime": 443
Quoting: Birtle34
Sj not paying 15 million for him to play against them, another year or two possibly, or they do that 3/4 more times, and even a 5 year plan doesn’t work, with 10 million ish of bad money against the books.


The Sharks have dug themselves into a real hole.......the only way out is to gut team and tank and stock pile draft picks.......no team is going to take on Burns contract without the Sharks retaining significant dollars.......this trade allows Sharks to move on from Burns and pick up two players they can trade out on good contracts for draft picks.......the $3,000,000 retained on Burns is chicken feed in the big picture and not a problem as Sharks are going to be unloading some other big salaries......they need to follow the Ottawa model.
22 déc. 2020 à 9 h 47
#19
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,230
Quoting: TML_Tika
The Sharks have dug themselves into a real hole.......the only way out is to gut team and tank and stock pile draft picks.......no team is going to take on Burns contract without the Sharks retaining significant dollars.......this trade allows Sharks to move on from Burns and pick up two players they can trade out on good contracts for draft picks.......the $3,000,000 retained on Burns is chicken feed in the big picture and not a problem as Sharks are going to be unloading some other big salaries......they need to follow the Ottawa model.


What about couture, vlasic and possibly a few others, I’m not arguing with the hole dug, I’m just saying that they may just have to somewhat ride it out it is so bad, to dig out of there problem, they need to limit retained especially 5 years away. I’m sure there is a variety of teams that would take on burns for some of there shorter contract issues, even lucic in Calgary or Erickson in Vancouver, so sharks free and clear on future cap issues. Holl and overpaid kerfoot not the answer to too many questions.
TML_Tika a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage