SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Little buy little sell playoff roster

Créé par: papishark
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 17 déc. 2020
Publié: 17 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is called the kids are here and we made the playoffs
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Marleau, Patrick (350 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Go be with Jumbo
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Sörensen, Marcus (750 000 $ retained)
3.
BUF
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
Some condition on him doing well to improve picks
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 429 166 $0 $922 500 $7 070 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
776 667 $776 667 $ (Bonis de performance110 000 $$110K)
C, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 déc. 2020 à 23 h 50
#1
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,590
Mentions "j'aime": 6,723
Buffalo has more use for Montour than mid round picks. If it was a solid 2nd maybe but there really isn't value in mid rounders for a win-now team with top 4 D.
Jdfitz77 a aimé ceci.
18 déc. 2020 à 0 h 3
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Buffalo has more use for Montour than mid round picks. If it was a solid 2nd maybe but there really isn't value in mid rounders for a win-now team with top 4 D.


Considering what they traded for him too...
18 déc. 2020 à 0 h 4
#3
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,590
Mentions "j'aime": 6,723
Quoting: mhockey91
Considering what they traded for him too...


Guhle is an AHLer and Brayden Tracey was a reach but yeah it's kind of nuts.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
18 déc. 2020 à 0 h 6
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Guhle is an AHLer and Brayden Tracey was a reach but yeah it's kind of nuts.


Tracey is still a solid prospect but yeah Ik
18 déc. 2020 à 0 h 13
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 4,032
Mentions "j'aime": 1,923
Montour >> Sörensen

Yet Sörensen is nabbing a 3rd and montour is landing a 3rd and 4th. Not sure why buffalo would do this.
18 déc. 2020 à 1 h 26
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: OrganizedConfusion55
Montour >> Sörensen

Yet Sörensen is nabbing a 3rd and montour is landing a 3rd and 4th. Not sure why buffalo would do this.


Deadline deal with conditions. Hes UFA. Sharks didnt have a second this year, pretty much just wanted to see who could be a target to fill the third pair RHD as a rental, value wasnt the point.
18 déc. 2020 à 1 h 27
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Buffalo has more use for Montour than mid round picks. If it was a solid 2nd maybe but there really isn't value in mid rounders for a win-now team with top 4 D.


The point was more the guy less the value
18 déc. 2020 à 2 h 24
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 5,120
Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
Quoting: papishark
Deadline deal with conditions. Hes UFA. Sharks didnt have a second this year, pretty much just wanted to see who could be a target to fill the third pair RHD as a rental, value wasnt the point.


Gotta think the Sabres could get at least a 2nd for Montour
Top4 RH defensemen are always in demand
papishark et sabres89 a aimé ceci.
18 déc. 2020 à 11 h 49
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Jdfitz77
Gotta think the Sabres could get at least a 2nd for Montour
Top4 RH defensemen are always in demand


True, there was rumors they wouldnt qualify him this year though. Depends how he does I suppose
18 déc. 2020 à 22 h 37
#10
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,590
Mentions "j'aime": 6,723
Quoting: papishark
The point was more the guy less the value


You've been on the site long enough to know when you have a trade displayed, it needs to be emphasized that value isn't of major importance. Orrrr you'll get those comments.
19 déc. 2020 à 0 h 9
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 5,120
Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
Quoting: papishark
True, there was rumors they wouldnt qualify him this year though. Depends how he does I suppose


Those rumors were obviously false
They were quickly dismissed
19 déc. 2020 à 21 h 57
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 4,032
Mentions "j'aime": 1,923
Quoting: papishark
Deadline deal with conditions. Hes UFA. Sharks didnt have a second this year, pretty much just wanted to see who could be a target to fill the third pair RHD as a rental, value wasnt the point.


Oh, so there is no point.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage