SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs close comparables throughout the league

Créé par: Saskleaf
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 14 déc. 2020
Publié: 14 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is a team of nhlers on other team much like current leafs. Let me know what you think.
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Eichel, Jack
Détails additionnels:
Matthews is better easily, but the comparison is close, and I didn't want to do Drais or Mack here (people would get mad)
2.
TOR
  1. Stamkos, Steven
Détails additionnels:
Very similar.
3.
TOR
  1. Svechnikov, Andrei
Détails additionnels:
Shut up Carolina fans.
4.
TOR
  1. Coleman, Blake
Détails additionnels:
Except for position, they are very similar.
5.
TOR
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
Détails additionnels:
When they were teammates, they were always kind of lumped together.
6.
TOR
  1. Marleau, Patrick
Détails additionnels:
Same draft year, both superstars back in the day, they were even teammates. Not a hard choice.
7.
TOR
  1. Järnkrok, Calle
Détails additionnels:
I don't know.
8.
TOR
  1. Lucic, Milan
Détails additionnels:
Both old washed up power forwards.
9.
TOR
  1. Tippett, Owen
Détails additionnels:
Both top of the line ohl prospects.
10.
TOR
  1. Koivu, Mikko
Détails additionnels:
Now it's close (at one point Spezza was better for sure).
11.
TOR
  1. Weal, Jordan
Détails additionnels:
Heck I don't know. Both players are fringe nhlers. Never really seen either play.
12.
TOR
  1. Petry, Jeff
Détails additionnels:
Got this from AruntiLehkonen's (definatly spelt it wrong, he's a cap friendly user) montreal version of this.
13.
TOR
  1. Klingberg, John
Détails additionnels:
Rielly a bit better, but I want to avoid bias so I made what I thought are slightly lesser leafs equivalent for several of my choices.
14.
TOR
  1. Kulak, Brett
Détails additionnels:
Same as Muzzin equivalent, can't take credit for the idea.
15.
TOR
  1. Siegenthaler, Jonas
Détails additionnels:
Meh I don't even know.
16.
TOR
  1. Zub, Artem
Détails additionnels:
Both this year khl free agent signings.
17.
TOR
  1. Brodin, Jonas
Détails additionnels:
Maybe I'm under rating Brodin? Let me know.
18.
TOR
  1. Binnington, Jordan
Détails additionnels:
Both good starters.
19.
TOR
  1. Demko, Thatcher
Détails additionnels:
Both solid Backups.
20.
TOR
  1. Rantanen, Mikko
Détails additionnels:
I changed it up. Thoughts?
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $67 980 000 $0 $4 600 000 $13 520 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 déc. 2020 à 2 h 30
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 749
Mentions "j'aime": 289
I would go:

Nylander : Ehlers
Marner: Rantanen
Robertson: Caufield
Freddy: Grubauer/Holtby
Saskleaf et chungus a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 3 h 26
#27
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Marner is NOT Stone that was the worse one. Maybe overall talent they're somewhat similar, but Stone was a possible Selke candidate, Marner is not there, probably won't be. Maybe currently Nylander is near Svech, not for long. Johnny T and Stammer are weird because of the wing transition for Stammer.
15 déc. 2020 à 3 h 28
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,099
Mentions "j'aime": 1,688
Quoting: Jdfitz77
Matthews is NOT “better easily” than Eichel
They’re neck & neck


I didn’t even get past that before wanting to reply. I have no issue with matthews being stated as better, but it’s definitely not cut and dry.
Jdfitz77 a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 8 h 19
#29
Démarrer sujet
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: mondo
Marner ≈ Rantanen more so than Stone.


Oh ya. That would have been better.
15 déc. 2020 à 8 h 25
#30
Démarrer sujet
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: mhockey91
Marner definitely isn’t as good two way as stone, but probably is a better playmaker. I wouldn’t say that’s a great comparison.

There’s no way Nylander is comparable to Svech. Cmon man.

Brodin> Brodie as well

Demko > Campbell

Most comparisons are good tho.


Quoting: Bcarlo25
Just can’t get behind the stone marner comparison.


Quoting: Isles777
most of the comparables are good but Marner is not close to stone and hyman isn't good defensively at even strength so I wouldn't say hes a comparable to Coleman.


Turns out everbody hated the Stone Marner comparison, so I went Rantanen (forgot about him lol). Let me know what you think.
15 déc. 2020 à 8 h 27
#31
Démarrer sujet
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: mhockey91
Marner definitely isn’t as good two way as stone, but probably is a better playmaker. I wouldn’t say that’s a great comparison.

There’s no way Nylander is comparable to Svech. Cmon man.

Brodin> Brodie as well

Demko > Campbell

Most comparisons are good tho.


Quoting: Bcarlo25
I mean, not to play that card, but ya. I’ve watched my team speedbag the leafs for a few years so I’ve seen plenty of Willy.

Nylander just isn’t the same kind of threat. Maybe more consistent? I guess I’d give you that. Svechnikov has, “well, nothing you can do about that,” kind of talent. I’ve never seen nylander do anything like that. That’s not really a knock on him. There aren’t really many players in the NHL that have a gear where they just can’t really be contained. Nylander isn’t one of them. I’ve seen plays that make me think svechnikov is.


I specifically went with Svech. Both players are very similar in my opinion. That one stays the same.
15 déc. 2020 à 8 h 29
#32
sbinalla
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,150
Mentions "j'aime": 357
applaud
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 8 h 29
#33
Démarrer sujet
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
2f3578cbb49fa8f45dc3ba87960a8f3b.pngbe1e3debd64666de5df745518ebd3c04.png

no?


Ahh, good old lylebubas and his trusty charts.
chungus a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 9 h 19
#34
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,091
Mentions "j'aime": 6,973
Quoting: Saskleaf
I specifically went with Svech. Both players are very similar in my opinion. That one stays the same.


Bad pick.
15 déc. 2020 à 9 h 20
#35
Démarrer sujet
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Bad pick.


Just look at @Lyle_Bubas 's chart again.
15 déc. 2020 à 9 h 26
#36
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,091
Mentions "j'aime": 6,973
Quoting: Saskleaf
Just look at @Lyle_Bubas 's chart again.


1. Lol, no. I’ll take a look at hockey instead.
2. There’s a pretty detailed conversation on this thread if you want to read through it. Multiple posters give their reasons for having svechnikov as head and shoulders above nylander despite their fantasy stats being very similar.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 9 h 27
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 497
Mentions "j'aime": 204
ill take Jack thanks
15 déc. 2020 à 9 h 45
#38
Démarrer sujet
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: kclar
ill take Jack thanks


Actually?
15 déc. 2020 à 9 h 54
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,299
Mentions "j'aime": 399
Quoting: ecupirate07
Nylander with an inflated shooting percentage and more ice time didn’t outscore Svech this year. Svech is better

What everyone also failed to take into account is the physical game svechnikov plays, something that Nylander doesn’t bring. You can make an argument based on point totals but you can’t make an argument based on style of play imo. You also have a big age difference and svech having limited opportunities compared to nylander.
DartGuy86 a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 9 h 57
#40
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,299
Mentions "j'aime": 399
Quoting: Saskleaf
Just look at @Lyle_Bubas 's chart again.

Because charts tell you so much. You can look at the stats but it tells you nothing about style of play or opportunity. You are also comparing one player entering his prime and one who just finished his second season. I think you can compare them on goals and assists but that is as much of a comparison as you can make. What is clear is that point totals are the same, and svech is 4 years younger, that should be all that is needed
15 déc. 2020 à 10 h 40
#41
Démarrer sujet
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: etpeck
What everyone also failed to take into account is the physical game svechnikov plays, something that Nylander doesn’t bring. You can make an argument based on point totals but you can’t make an argument based on style of play imo. You also have a big age difference and svech having limited opportunities compared to nylander.


That is the one difference, yes.
15 déc. 2020 à 10 h 43
#42
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 497
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: Saskleaf
Actually?


actually.
15 déc. 2020 à 12 h 3
#43
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,212
Mentions "j'aime": 2,956
Quoting: etpeck
What everyone also failed to take into account is the physical game svechnikov plays, something that Nylander doesn’t bring. You can make an argument based on point totals but you can’t make an argument based on style of play imo. You also have a big age difference and svech having limited opportunities compared to nylander.


That is a difference but Svechnikov also has a lot more giveaways. Plusses and minus to the style of play they play.
15 déc. 2020 à 12 h 6
#44
torontos finest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,560
Mentions "j'aime": 11,191
I'd say Nylander ≈ Ehlers. Same age and comparable stat lines.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 12 h 17
#45
Démarrer sujet
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: ecupirate07
That is a difference but Svechnikov also has a lot more giveaways. Plusses and minus to the style of play they play.


Quoting: mondo
I'd say Nylander ≈ Ehlers. Same age and comparable stat lines.


Ehlers may have been a better choice.
ecupirate07 a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 11 h 43
#46
Démarrer sujet
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: Jdfitz77
Matthews is NOT “better easily” than Eichel
They’re neck & neck

Quoting: Theozler
I didn’t even get past that before wanting to reply. I have no issue with matthews being stated as better, but it’s definitely not cut and dry.

Quoting: kclar
ill take Jack thanks


Out of curiosity, still Eichel=Matthews?
18 mars 2021 à 16 h 0
#47
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 5,120
Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
Quoting: Saskleaf
Out of curiosity, still Eichel=Matthews?


-ish
But it’s fair to rank Matthews ahead bc of this season
He’s just not “better easily” imo
Saskleaf et kclar a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage