SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Team Canada 2022

Créé par: arafay
Équipe: 2020-21 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 14 déc. 2020
Publié: 14 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I tried to put playing styles together as best as I could with a few tweaks. I also put schiefele on his left wing with couturier and stone since that woudl make an elite defensive 3rd line, whereas the 4th would utilize the best scorer on the team in stammer with playmakers like barzal and marner. Basically, I switched barzal and scheifele around to better fit style.

I think this team once again has to be the favourites.
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
26500 000 000 $163 397 999 $0 $5 432 500 $336 602 001 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Barzal, Matthew
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 déc. 2020 à 22 h 44
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,091
Mentions "j'aime": 6,971
Barzal on a fourth line seems kind of pointless to me.
14 déc. 2020 à 22 h 47
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,318
Mentions "j'aime": 2,384
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Barzal on a fourth line seems kind of pointless to me.


I was thinking it would be more like 2 3rd lines (if that’s even a thing with this much talent)
14 déc. 2020 à 22 h 51
#3
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,091
Mentions "j'aime": 6,971
Quoting: arafay
I was thinking it would be more like 2 3rd lines (if that’s even a thing with this much talent)


In fairness, barzal on this team seems pointless to me. However in a bottom six role i just see no case to be made for it. Barzal needs to be playing a lot, and in offensive situations.

What’s he doing here? Taking defensive face offs? Penalty killing? Being an energy line. If we’re talking fourth line center for team canada, i don’t think i would have him in the top 30 candidates. You really want a guy that’s one of the worst face off men in the league playing this role? Put ROR up there. He’s a better player anyway, and can actually play in that capacity.
mokumboi a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 10 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 111
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Trotz has taught Barzal to be more of a two-way player. With that in mind, I can assume the guy who made this expects Barzal to be able to handle a bottom 6 spot on team Canada, but who knows.
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 6
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,318
Mentions "j'aime": 2,384
Quoting: Bcarlo25
In fairness, barzal on this team seems pointless to me. However in a bottom six role i just see no case to be made for it. Barzal needs to be playing a lot, and in offensive situations.

What’s he doing here? Taking defensive face offs? Penalty killing? Being an energy line. If we’re talking fourth line center for team canada, i don’t think i would have him in the top 30 candidates. You really want a guy that’s one of the worst face off men in the league playing this role? Put ROR up there. He’s a better player anyway, and can actually play in that capacity.


Barzal>ROR. That fourth line won’t be bad in it’s one zone either and the 2nd and third kind can handle the majority of defensive zone starts and such. I’d rather have a skilled fourth line if I have two lines that will be excellent in their own zone ahead of them.
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 17
#6
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,091
Mentions "j'aime": 6,971
Quoting: arafay
Barzal>ROR. That fourth line won’t be bad in it’s one zone either and the 2nd and third kind can handle the majority of defensive zone starts and such. I’d rather have a skilled fourth line if I have two lines that will be excellent in their own zone ahead of them.


I just don’t even know how to respond to that. Up is down.
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 28
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,318
Mentions "j'aime": 2,384
Quoting: Bcarlo25
I just don’t even know how to respond to that. Up is down.


Yeah we clearly have differing opinions here on what we want.

What I think is that if you have 2 very good lines defensively already, you don’t need your fourth line to be amazing defensively, it can simple be adequate. Though I think barzal (aside from faceoffs) is much better than you are implying.

I also think Barzal is better than ROR. As I said with an argument regarding scheifele vs ROR, barzal is simply more dynamic. The one issue I have is maybe he’s not ready defensively that would possibly put ROR ahead of him. In that case, of course I’d rather have ROR in this lineup. But I think barzal is good enough defensively to handle the role
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 30
#8
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,091
Mentions "j'aime": 6,971
Quoting: arafay
Yeah we clearly have differing opinions here on what we want.

What I think is that if you have 2 very good lines defensively already, you don’t need your fourth line to be amazing defensively, it can simple be adequate. Though I think barzal (aside from faceoffs) is much better than you are implying.

I also think Barzal is better than ROR. As I said with an argument regarding scheifele vs ROR, barzal is simply more dynamic. The one issue I have is maybe he’s not ready defensively that would possibly put ROR ahead of him. In that case, of course I’d rather have ROR in this lineup. But I think barzal is good enough defensively to handle the role


Honestly i don’t even think hockey canada has more than a 2 minute conversation about barzal. Then they cross him off the list with a dozen other centers ahead of him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage