SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3 Way Deal with Calgary and Nashville

Créé par: SmugTkachuk
Équipe: 2020-21 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 1 déc. 2020
Publié: 1 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Some cap would still need to be touched up for Calgary and Nashville

To Nashville:
Stamkos
Pelleltier
Ryan

To Tampa:
1st (Cgy)
2nd (Nsh)
2nd (Cgy
Bennett

To Calgary:
Forsberg


Why this is good for Nashville: Top end center that can elevate that team without giving up a 1st.

Why this is good for Calgary: Right shot winger that absolutely fits what the Flames are looking for in their top 6

Why this is good for Tampa: It's not, but they need to get under that cap badly and this is the only guy they can move that will allow them to fit both RFA contracts without moving another major piece
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
12 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TBL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NSH)
2.
TBL
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
CGY
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TBL
Logo de CGY
Logo de NSH
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NJD
2022
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
2023
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $81 216 666 $0 $0 $283 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 déc. 2020 à 15 h 59
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,251
Mentions "j'aime": 10,597
What do Flames get?
Just saw the description
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 0
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Gmonwy
What do Flames get?


Forsberg from Nashville. They put up the first for Nashville and send a good prospect to Nashville.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 10
#3
I want Gourde back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,550
Mentions "j'aime": 2,370
Stamkos ain't waiving his NMC
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 14
#4
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: imawesome
Stamkos ain't waiving his NMC


Agreed. I think if he were to waive Nashville would be one of the few attractive places that could fit him.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 21
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: imawesome
Stamkos ain't waiving his NMC


are you kidding me. Stamkos is a 40 goal scorer. They aren't trading him for this.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 30
#6
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: pharrow
are you kidding me. Stamkos is a 40 goal scorer. They aren't trading him for this.


Okay then they lose Ciarelli and Cernak for less. Guys aren't waiving their NMC's down there and Killorn is the only big piece with full protection. A Killorn move would open up room for one of Cernak or Ciarelli and you just zapped their value again because the Lightning would get more desperate. No one is taking TJ for free, Gourde's contract is nearly as bad as Johnson's and no one else is worth moving. They just went through an entire playoff without Stamkos and faired okay, he's the most sensical piece to move and with full protection his value is not where it should be.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 32
#7
I want Gourde back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,550
Mentions "j'aime": 2,370
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Okay then they lose Ciarelli and Cernak for less. Guys aren't waiving their NMC's down there and Killorn is the only big piece with full protection. A Killorn move would open up room for one of Cernak or Ciarelli and you just zapped their value again because the Lightning would get more desperate. No one is taking TJ for free, Gourde's contract is nearly as bad as Johnson's and no one else is worth moving. They just went through an entire playoff without Stamkos and faired okay, he's the most sensical piece to move and with full protection his value is not where it should be.


They trade Killorn, sign Cernak and then trade either McDonagh/Johnson/Cirelli/Palat.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 34
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Okay then they lose Ciarelli and Cernak for less. Guys aren't waiving their NMC's down there and Killorn is the only big piece with full protection. A Killorn move would open up room for one of Cernak or Ciarelli and you just zapped their value again because the Lightning would get more desperate. No one is taking TJ for free, Gourde's contract is nearly as bad as Johnson's and no one else is worth moving. They just went through an entire playoff without Stamkos and faired okay, he's the most sensical piece to move and with full protection his value is not where it should be.


dude this childish attitude.
They will deal with Cirelli and Cernak. It doesn't cost them Stamkos.
Your bitterness is unreal.
And believe me if their choice is between a 40 goal center and Cernak.....they are gonna keep the 40 goal center and so would every other damn team in the whole NHL.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 37
#9
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: pharrow
dude this childish attitude.
They will deal with Cirelli and Cernak. It doesn't cost them Stamkos.
Your bitterness is unreal.
And believe me if their choice is between a 40 goal center and Cernak.....they are gonna keep the 40 goal center and so would every other damn team in the whole NHL.


Who hurt your feelings? What attitude are you reading?! Haha yikes, I didn't know this site got so delicate!
I'm going to continue to have a conversation elsewhere instead of moving along with your goofy reply okay?
Abroot a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 38
#10
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: imawesome
They trade Killorn, sign Cernak and then trade either McDonagh/Johnson/Cirelli/Palat.


Ideally for sure but you look at who can fit those contracts that would be an attractive place for those guys to waive to.. It's a very tough find.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 42
#11
I want Gourde back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,550
Mentions "j'aime": 2,370
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Ideally for sure but you look at who can fit those contracts that would be an attractive place for those guys to waive to.. It's a very tough find.


I was thinking Nashville and Columbus maybe. They are smaller markets though so they might not be able to afford it.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 45
#12
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: imawesome
I was thinking Nashville and Columbus maybe. They are smaller markets though so they might not be able to afford it.


Out of those two Nashville is obviously a great option and a place guys would want to go, of the guys we have listed above I think that Cirelli and Palat are the only two they would look at. Definitely an interesting situation to watch.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 49
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Who hurt your feelings? What attitude are you reading?! Haha yikes, I didn't know this site got so delicate!
I'm going to continue to have a conversation elsewhere instead of moving along with your goofy reply okay?


dude, if you can't realize what's wrong with this.

"Okay then they lose Ciarelli and Cernak for less. "

then you should really self evaluate.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 50
#14
I want Gourde back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,550
Mentions "j'aime": 2,370
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Out of those two Nashville is obviously a great option and a place guys would want to go, of the guys we have listed above I think that Cirelli and Palat are the only two they would look at. Definitely an interesting situation to watch.


I think they'd look at Killorn
SmugTkachuk a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 16 h 57
#15
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: pharrow
dude, if you can't realize what's wrong with this.

"Okay then they lose Ciarelli and Cernak for less. "

then you should really self evaluate.


If your feelings are so hurt by that and you can't read that without flying off the handle then you severely need to get a hold of whatever you're dealing with.
Take a look at how the other guy dealt with it, like a grown up.
1 déc. 2020 à 17 h 0
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
If your feelings are so hurt by that and you can't read that without flying off the handle then you severely need to get a hold of whatever you're dealing with.
Take a look at how the other guy dealt with it, like a grown up.


dude no one's feelings are hurt here. You seem to think it's no me, for calling you out on it. It's not.
It just makes what you wrote look like pure nonsense.
1 déc. 2020 à 17 h 4
#17
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: pharrow
dude no one's feelings are hurt here. You seem to think it's no me, for calling you out on it. It's not.
It just makes what you wrote look like pure nonsense.


If I said things like this would you still think I need to check my attitude at the door or would it make what I said nonsense?
"2025 eyeroll, LOL my god listen to yourself."

"congrats, you just made the penguins worse."

"like obviously"

Or do they just make me look like an enraged little kid?
1 déc. 2020 à 17 h 21
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
If I said things like this would you still think I need to check my attitude at the door or would it make what I said nonsense?
"2025 eyeroll, LOL my god listen to yourself."

"congrats, you just made the penguins worse."

"like obviously"

Or do they just make me look like an enraged little kid?


you realize the "like obviously" was a totally sarcastic reply right?
and no none of those replies have your tone. At all.
"Fine...then you lose both then....because i'm bitter...."
really, it's a horrible tone. Figure it out.
1 déc. 2020 à 17 h 28
#19
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: pharrow
you realize the "like obviously" was a totally sarcastic reply right?
and no none of those replies have your tone. At all.
"Fine...then you lose both then....because i'm bitter...."
really, it's a horrible tone. Figure it out.


Hahaha so you can defend one of your own comments and just ignore the other ones because you look like a child in those ones. You physically typed out "eyeroll" and then want to be talked to like an adult on here. I have zero bitterness whatsoever, as proven by the other conversation that stemmed from that comment, you've come in here with your crocodile tears and a full diaper upset that someone thinks what you said was stupid. Does my tone reflect hysterics now? Is that what you're getting from this? Because this could be one of the funniest conversations I have had on this website.
1 déc. 2020 à 18 h 55
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 322
Mentions "j'aime": 76
This is not right, right? Do we get Forsberg for just a 1st a 2nd and Bennett? OMG YES
1 déc. 2020 à 19 h 16
#21
SEA GM v5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 3,000
Mentions "j'aime": 878
Quoting: az27042007
This is not right, right? Do we get Forsberg for just a 1st a 2nd and Bennett? OMG YES


Don't forget Pelletier and Ryan
1 déc. 2020 à 19 h 28
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 322
Mentions "j'aime": 76
Quoting: ItzMeTaboo
Don't forget Pelletier and Ryan


oh, right I didn't realize.
2 déc. 2020 à 9 h 17
#23
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: az27042007
This is not right, right? Do we get Forsberg for just a 1st a 2nd and Bennett? OMG YES


Yes as someone mentioned, Calgary would be giving up 1st, Pelletier, Bennett, Ryan for Forsberg. In a vacuum Nashville doesn't do that, but when Nashville is getting Stamkos without giving up a first or their high end prospects you would have to think it is a little more attractive to them.
2 déc. 2020 à 9 h 19
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 322
Mentions "j'aime": 76
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Yes as someone mentioned, Calgary would be giving up 1st, Pelletier, Bennett, Ryan for Forsberg. In a vacuum Nashville doesn't do that, but when Nashville is getting Stamkos without giving up a first or their high end prospects you would have to think it is a little more attractive to them.


Yes it is but it wont happen since Stamkos NMC
2 déc. 2020 à 10 h 25
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 3,902
Mentions "j'aime": 1,760
Quoting: pharrow
are you kidding me. Stamkos is a 40 goal scorer. They aren't trading him for this.


I completely agree. You dont trade this guy for this package or at all really, he's legit awesome.
TB is in a tough spot (their fault), but dealing their captain doesn't make sense IMO
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage