SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Mock-Draft

2017

2017

Cuvée de repêchage: 2017
Créé par: AlexTheKid09
Publié: 28 nov. 2020 à 11 h 17
RONDE 1ÉQUIPEORIGINALJOUEURDéTAILS
28 nov. 2020 à 12 h 21
#1
I heff to be mad...
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,494
Mentions "j'aime": 1,196
Liljegren is much better than Vaakanainen
28 nov. 2020 à 17 h 31
#2
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: LeafsFan4Ever34
Liljegren is much better than Vaakanainen


Based on?
28 nov. 2020 à 19 h 13
#3
Jeuck75
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,076
Mentions "j'aime": 1,600
Cale Makar is too low. He's go at LEAST 2nd. Maybe even 1st!!
28 nov. 2020 à 19 h 54
#4
sen krak fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 4,391
Mentions "j'aime": 1,516
Where is Liligjern?And Makar should be 3rd!
28 nov. 2020 à 20 h 23
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: Brad21
Where is Liligjern?And Makar should be 3rd!


You been impressed with liljegren?
29 nov. 2020 à 12 h 40
#6
sen krak fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 4,391
Mentions "j'aime": 1,516
Quoting: Bcarlo25
You been impressed with liljegren?


Well mostly.
29 nov. 2020 à 13 h 0
#7
Xavier
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Based on?


Based on his AHL play. He was one of the contenders for Defensemen of the year before he was called up to the NHL
He didn't do good in the NHL but his step up in the AHL this year is for sure better than Vaakanainen
29 nov. 2020 à 19 h 14
#8
Jinx god
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,201
Mentions "j'aime": 13,729
Quoting: Jeuck75
Cale Makar is too low. He's go at LEAST 2nd. Maybe even 1st!!


Heiskanen is better than him
RedWing9119 a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2020 à 22 h 6
#9
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: XQOM
Based on his AHL play. He was one of the contenders for Defensemen of the year before he was called up to the NHL
He didn't do good in the NHL but his step up in the AHL this year is for sure better than Vaakanainen


Based on what? Their hockeydb page? Or would you like to say you’ve seen them both play a whole bunch?
30 nov. 2020 à 2 h 5
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,956
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Juuso Valimaki should be way higher. Like fifth or sixth.
30 nov. 2020 à 2 h 42
#11
Xavier
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Based on what? Their hockeydb page? Or would you like to say you’ve seen them both play a whole bunch?


Ok fair I haven't seen Vaakanainen play, but not everything comes down to eye test. The difference of numbers from last year was so great that I can confidently say Liljegren is better.
Also after reading some reports for others who know much more than me, also agree. I can send the links just reply if you want them.
30 nov. 2020 à 7 h 28
#12
Jeuck75
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,076
Mentions "j'aime": 1,600
Quoting: EsoYeezus69
Heiskanen is better than him


Lol, no he's not
30 nov. 2020 à 9 h 25
#13
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: XQOM
Ok fair I haven't seen Vaakanainen play, but not everything comes down to eye test. The difference of numbers from last year was so great that I can confidently say Liljegren is better.
Also after reading some reports for others who know much more than me, also agree. I can send the links just reply if you want them.


Nah I’m good. I’ve formed my own opinion. Super high ceiling, kind of diminishing chance of fulfilling his potential.

This is more about what I think about liljegren than anything. I don’t think he’s anything.
30 nov. 2020 à 11 h 38
#14
Xavier
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Nah I’m good. I’ve formed my own opinion. Super high ceiling, kind of diminishing chance of fulfilling his potential.

This is more about what I think about liljegren than anything. I don’t think he’s anything.


He had a great season last year as he continues to improve. The only year he struggled was his 19 year old season (2nd marlie season).
Last season only Jake Bean and Erik Brannstrom had a higher PPG in the AHL. Liljegren is great in transition and strong defensively.
I understand you are a Boston Bruin fan and being biased. In my own Mock draft I have Liljegren falling from 17 to 25
30 nov. 2020 à 11 h 41
#15
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: XQOM
He had a great season last year as he continues to improve. The only year he struggled was his 19 year old season (2nd marlie season).
Last season only Jake Bean and Erik Brannstrom had a higher PPG in the AHL. Liljegren is great in transition and strong defensively.
I understand you are a Boston Bruin fan and being biased. In my own Mock draft I have Liljegren falling from 17 to 25


And you are a leafs fan being what exactly?
RedWing9119 a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2020 à 12 h 27
#16
Xavier
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: Bcarlo25
And you are a leafs fan being what exactly?


True I'm a leafs fan, and I'm biased about a lot of things, but just look up professionally done re-draft. I don't think you can find one that has Vaakanainen over Liljegren.
Tbh it's just a awful take all around. His regular stats, his advanced stats, professional reporters all favor Liljegren. Sure your criticism is fair and in a redraft Liljegren deserves to fall around 8-15 picks but not as far as Vaakanainen.
30 nov. 2020 à 13 h 0
#17
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: XQOM
True I'm a leafs fan, and I'm biased about a lot of things, but just look up professionally done re-draft. I don't think you can find one that has Vaakanainen over Liljegren.
Tbh it's just a awful take all around. His regular stats, his advanced stats, professional reporters all favor Liljegren. Sure your criticism is fair and in a redraft Liljegren deserves to fall around 8-15 picks but not as far as Vaakanainen.


The language i objected to was, “Liljgeren is much better than Vaakanainen.” Now, personally, I like Vaakanainen a smidge better purely because of style of play. I think his attention to the defensive areas of the game have a bigger impact on the ice, and have the added benefit of normally being contractually more valuable (defense doesn’t get paid the way point production does). However, I think they’re pretty much in the same boat. Both have pretty high ceilings, but are in the territory of, “I kinda would have liked them to be in the NHL by now more consistently.”
XQOM a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2020 à 15 h 38
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 53
Makar at 2
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage