SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Penguins Rangers Rumours Mid Season Trade

Créé par: Pens3lieve
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 28 nov. 2020
Publié: 28 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Notes:

-this idea would only become reality if some mix of matheson/POJ/riikola/Lee make Pettersson expendable.
-I think the Pettersson contact (while not bad) is kind of a bit much especially with the financial chaos covid has brought. I think his taking the one year previous at under 800K made this deal's AAV higher as GMJR and the pens "repaid" him for $$ lost.
-the pens have a whole lot of $$$ and bodies on LHD right now, but I think they will probably start the season like this and see how things pan out...
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Kravtsov, Vitali
Détails additionnels:
who adds?
NYR
  1. Pettersson, Marcus
Détails additionnels:
who adds?
2.
PIT
    I feel NYR would add a mid pick or a depth player as Pettersson is an established top-4 D while VK has yet to prove anything.
    NYR
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de ANA
    2022
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    2023
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $74 545 000 $0 $1 912 500 $6 955 000 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    894 167 $894 167 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    725 000 $725 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    853 333 $853 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    28 nov. 2020 à 10 h 43
    #1
    Servant of Chaos
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 1,111
    Mentions "j'aime": 453
    If Pettersson is "expendable" then why do the Rangers need or want him, especially at the cost of their 2nd best prospect outside the NHL? Penguins would need to add a 1st+take back a cap dump to make the Rangers even consider this.
    28 nov. 2020 à 10 h 50
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Hockey IQ
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 2,998
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,481
    Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
    If Pettersson is "expendable" then why do the Rangers need or want him, especially at the cost of their 2nd best prospect outside the NHL? Penguins would need to add a 1st+take back a cap dump to make the Rangers even consider this.


    fair point. maybe expendable isn't the best word to use. I just mean we have 3 LHD making over 4M and 2 cheaper options that can play probably this year on the left side... there's a log jam and from a distance it looks like NYR has a hole there.
    28 nov. 2020 à 11 h 4
    #3
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    How is an established top 4 D making just over 4 mil a lot?
    28 nov. 2020 à 11 h 8
    #4
    Servant of Chaos
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 1,111
    Mentions "j'aime": 453
    Quoting: Pens3lieve
    fair point. maybe expendable isn't the best word to use. I just mean we have 3 LHD making over 4M and 2 cheaper options that can play probably this year on the left side... there's a log jam and from a distance it looks like NYR has a hole there.


    The Rangers also have K'Andre Miller & Tarmo Reunanen looking like they could push for spots this season, plus Libor Hajek, Brendan Smith (ew), and Jack Johnson (also ew). That's not including Ryan Lindgren, who's a lock. Longer term, Zac Jones is looking like he'll have a legit chance to be a decent NHLer in a few years.

    The cap is also a (significant) obstacle. They can't just add 4m in cap without sending some major cap back.
    28 nov. 2020 à 11 h 16
    #5
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
    If Pettersson is "expendable" then why do the Rangers need or want him, especially at the cost of their 2nd best prospect outside the NHL? Penguins would need to add a 1st+take back a cap dump to make the Rangers even consider this.


    1st they aren't trading MP. 2nd, Kravtsov isn't worth that even by other NYR fans opinions.

    3rd Just because a player is deemed "expendable " by some fan, doesn't mean they have no value. McDonagh in TB is "expendable" not because he's a horrible defenseman, but because they don't really have room for a 6 million per 3LD and Headman is the number 1 and Sergy in the number 2 in that scenario.
    So for the love of god, slow your homerism role.
    MisstheWhalers et mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
    28 nov. 2020 à 11 h 30
    #6
    Servant of Chaos
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 1,111
    Mentions "j'aime": 453
    Quoting: pharrow
    1st they aren't trading MP. 2nd, Kravtsov isn't worth that even by other NYR fans opinions.

    3rd Just because a player is deemed "expendable " by some fan, doesn't mean they have no value. McDonagh in TB is "expendable" not because he's a horrible defenseman, but because they don't really have room for a 6 million per 3LD and Headman is the number 1 and Sergy in the number 2 in that scenario.
    So for the love of god, slow your homerism role.


    The Rangers have enough cap trouble as is, and Kravtsov would be many organizations' top prospect. The 1st+cap dump was hyperbole, b/c I've gotten tired of asking people to provide an actual vetted source suggesting he's available.

    But the Rangers cannot afford to take on 4m in cap without sending a significant amount back. ****ing Kreider contract
    28 nov. 2020 à 11 h 31
    #7
    Jeuck75
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 4,079
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,602
    Pens add.....ALOT!!!!!!
    28 nov. 2020 à 11 h 39
    #8
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
    The Rangers have enough cap trouble as is, and Kravtsov would be many organizations' top prospect. The 1st+cap dump was hyperbole, b/c I've gotten tired of asking people to provide an actual vetted source suggesting he's available.

    But the Rangers cannot afford to take on 4m in cap without sending a significant amount back. ****ing Kreider contract


    which is why it's not going to be MP.
    It's going to be POJ.
    If they were to do this, it would be a prospect swap.
    Pure and simple. 1 team trading depth for another teams depth.
    NY has depth at RW, the penguins have depth at LD.
    POJ is looked at as a 2LD, Kravtsov a mid 6 winger. It's a fair swap.
    Both teams get something they need at a cap hit they can handle.
    At this point it's not where you were drafted. It's what are you doing with it.
    If this was going to happen, that's what it would look like.
    mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
    28 nov. 2020 à 11 h 48
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,563
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: pharrow
    which is why it's not going to be MP.
    It's going to be POJ.
    If they were to do this, it would be a prospect swap.
    Pure and simple. 1 team trading depth for another teams depth.
    NY has depth at RW, the penguins have depth at LD.
    POJ is looked at as a 2LD, Kravtsov a mid 6 winger. It's a fair swap.
    Both teams get something they need at a cap hit they can handle.
    At this point it's not where you were drafted. It's what are you doing with it.
    If this was going to happen, that's what it would look like.


    Left Defense is the last position we need right now so that trade would be horrible for us when Kravtsov will be a cheap forward. We’ve got Lindgren, Reunanen, Miller, Robertson, Jones and then potentially shifting DeAngelo there temporarily. We’re good, we just need to be patient while our guys develop. What we need is centers with high upside.
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    28 nov. 2020 à 11 h 52
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 4,897
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
    Take back smith at least
    28 nov. 2020 à 12 h 0
    #11
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    Left Defense is the last position we need right now so that trade would be horrible for us when Kravtsov will be a cheap forward. We’ve got Lindgren, Reunanen, Miller, Robertson, Jones and then potentially shifting DeAngelo there temporarily. We’re good, we just need to be patient while our guys develop. What we need is centers with high upside.


    this all depends on how you view the prospect and the team.
    If you are NY, your best chance of winning is right now.
    If you don't win with guys on rookie deals, you are set to reach cap hell and have the window of help closed out.
    NY has a lot of high end 1st round picks up there. If they get paid, that's it, things get harder.
    So if you view the team as "win now, while you have money for help and young stars" you don't have time to wait.
    It all depends on how you view the team.
    mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
    28 nov. 2020 à 12 h 17
    #12
    B
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 7,907
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
    Quoting: pharrow
    which is why it's not going to be MP.
    It's going to be POJ.
    If they were to do this, it would be a prospect swap.
    Pure and simple. 1 team trading depth for another teams depth.
    NY has depth at RW, the penguins have depth at LD.
    POJ is looked at as a 2LD, Kravtsov a mid 6 winger. It's a fair swap.
    Both teams get something they need at a cap hit they can handle.
    At this point it's not where you were drafted. It's what are you doing with it.
    If this was going to happen, that's what it would look like.


    POJ is looking more like a bust and would fall behind our many Ld prospects. Nice try
    28 nov. 2020 à 12 h 19
    #13
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    Quoting: DoubleADoubleK
    POJ is looking more like a bust and would fall behind our many Ld prospects. Nice try


    dude you so bitter, if any of the two guys looks like a bust it's Kravtsov .....and that's coming from other ranger fans.
    So done with ya. bye
    mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
    28 nov. 2020 à 12 h 22
    #14
    B
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 7,907
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
    Quoting: pharrow
    this all depends on how you view the prospect and the team.
    If you are NY, your best chance of winning is right now.
    If you don't win with guys on rookie deals, you are set to reach cap hell and have the window of help closed out.
    NY has a lot of high end 1st round picks up there. If they get paid, that's it, things get harder.
    So if you view the team as "win now, while you have money for help and young stars" you don't have time to wait.
    It all depends on how you view the team.


    Cap hell from now on, like 90% of teams. We'll have to pay many good young ones, wisely. Window is not even open yet and you're talking about it closing lol
    28 nov. 2020 à 12 h 25
    #15
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    Quoting: DoubleADoubleK
    Cap hell from now on, like 90% of teams. We'll have to pay many good young ones, wisely. Window is not even open yet and you're talking about it closing lol


    dude you got a 1st over all and a 2nd over all, on rookie deals. If your window is ever open.......it's now.
    Because in 3 years, if they aren't total busts, you are going to look like TOR, paying them big money and no cap left to have help. Which means no depth, and that's what is needed to win.
    So yeah, your window is now. Unless your picks are busts.
    28 nov. 2020 à 12 h 40
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 15,921
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
    Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
    If Pettersson is "expendable" then why do the Rangers need or want him, especially at the cost of their 2nd best prospect outside the NHL? Penguins would need to add a 1st+take back a cap dump to make the Rangers even consider this.


    I wouldn’t even trade MP for Kratsov straight up let alone this mess
    Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
    28 nov. 2020 à 12 h 56
    #17
    Démarrer sujet
    Hockey IQ
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 2,998
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,481
    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    How is an established top 4 D making just over 4 mil a lot?


    thing is we have hopefully 3 of them so...with 2 making about 1 mil so we just have too many bodies...
    don't get me wrong I love Pettersson I just think he has the most value...
    28 nov. 2020 à 12 h 58
    #18
    Démarrer sujet
    Hockey IQ
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 2,998
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,481
    Quoting: pharrow
    which is why it's not going to be MP.
    It's going to be POJ.
    If they were to do this, it would be a prospect swap.
    Pure and simple. 1 team trading depth for another teams depth.
    NY has depth at RW, the penguins have depth at LD.
    POJ is looked at as a 2LD, Kravtsov a mid 6 winger. It's a fair swap.
    Both teams get something they need at a cap hit they can handle.
    At this point it's not where you were drafted. It's what are you doing with it.
    If this was going to happen, that's what it would look like.


    yeah that's more likely if they are set on having the other 3 LHD (Dumo, Petey, Matheson) start. it's just alot of $$ for a left side...that's the only reason I'm even contemplating it...
    28 nov. 2020 à 13 h 1
    #19
    Démarrer sujet
    Hockey IQ
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 2,998
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,481
    Quoting: Islesforthecup
    Take back smith at least


    you can dump him on a rebuilding team for a 3rd prob...

    Quoting: DoubleADoubleK
    POJ is looking more like a bust and would fall behind our many Ld prospects. Nice try

    since when is POJ a bust??? he has a tremendous last season after dealing with injuries. he's only like 20-21 now so he'll still probably gain some muscle and size.
    he played all situations last year and his #1 fan in mike vellucci is now promoted to pens AS coach...
    PGHBOB69 a aimé ceci.
    28 nov. 2020 à 13 h 2
    #20
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 1,330
    Mentions "j'aime": 454
    Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
    If Pettersson is "expendable" then why do the Rangers need or want him, especially at the cost of their 2nd best prospect outside the NHL? Penguins would need to add a 1st+take back a cap dump to make the Rangers even consider this.


    He’s a top 4 D. He’s expendable like Trouba would be for you. We have younger prospects coming up that can hopefully fill his spot. Probably wont be as good though. It’s most likely gonna be a drop off. Does it make Trouba bad if he’s expendable?? And he’s not signed for 8M like Trouba. He’s a reasonable 4.025M, long term. At 24 years old.
    Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
    28 nov. 2020 à 13 h 3
    #21
    Démarrer sujet
    Hockey IQ
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 2,998
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,481
    Quoting: PGHBOB69
    He’s a top 4 D. He’s expendable like Trouba would be for you. We have younger prospects coming up that can hopefully fill his spot. Probably wont be as good though. It’s most likely gonna be a drop off. Does it Make Trouba bad if he’s expendable??


    true.
    28 nov. 2020 à 13 h 31
    #22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 5,351
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Kravtsov is severely over rated.

    True value would be closer to Kravtsov for Björkqvist plus something like a 5th or 6th.

    Kravtsov was drafted high, but stunted. He also doesn't want to leave Russia so acquiring him is a waste of assets.
    28 nov. 2020 à 13 h 53
    #23
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    Quoting: Yojimbo
    Kravtsov is severely over rated.

    True value would be closer to Kravtsov for Björkqvist plus something like a 5th or 6th.

    Kravtsov was drafted high, but stunted. He also doesn't want to leave Russia so acquiring him is a waste of assets.


    Did he tell you he won't leave russia?
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    28 nov. 2020 à 13 h 53
    #24
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    Quoting: Pens3lieve
    thing is we have hopefully 3 of them so...with 2 making about 1 mil so we just have too many bodies...
    don't get me wrong I love Pettersson I just think he has the most value...


    Its dumo
    28 nov. 2020 à 14 h 23
    #25
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    Quoting: Pens3lieve
    yeah that's more likely if they are set on having the other 3 LHD (Dumo, Petey, Matheson) start. it's just alot of $$ for a left side...that's the only reason I'm even contemplating it...


    it is, which is why Matheson has to play well. So they can ship him out. Which win or lose makes the 3RD spot, the most important on the team at this point. Because he can't sink. It's not an option.
    Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage