SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Could they go again

Créé par: Bruinsforlife
Équipe: 2020-21 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 26 nov. 2020
Publié: 26 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
STL
  1. Goligoski, Alex (2 000 000 $ retained)
ARI
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de DET
2022
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 025 515 $306 349 $425 000 $10 474 485 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 475 000 $1 475 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 275 000 $3 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 nov. 2020 à 11 h 39
#1
Breadman likes Bread
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,729
Too much for Goligoski imo. He’s good, but you’d be better off giving them a draft pick and maybe a decent prospect.
26 nov. 2020 à 11 h 48
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,654
Mentions "j'aime": 251
Quoting: KingLundqvist30
Too much for Goligoski imo. He’s good, but you’d be better off giving them a draft pick and maybe a decent prospect.


It would cost a first to get rid of steen, goligoski with that retention would be a 2nd and a 4th, so Dunn for that work, plus blues will most likely protect 7-3 and they are forced to protect krug and Faulk and I’m pretty sure they would protect parayko over Dunn wich will result in loosing Dunn anyway
KingLundqvist30 et imawesome a aimé ceci.
26 nov. 2020 à 12 h 5
#3
Breadman likes Bread
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,729
Quoting: Bruinsforlife
It would cost a first to get rid of steen, goligoski with that retention would be a 2nd and a 4th, so Dunn for that work, plus blues will most likely protect 7-3 and they are forced to protect krug and Faulk and I’m pretty sure they would protect parayko over Dunn wich will result in loosing Dunn anyway

I didn’t look at it that way. I see it now. For some reason I thought it said ‘Sundqvist’ instead of ‘Steen’.
26 nov. 2020 à 12 h 49
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,437
Mentions "j'aime": 374
Quoting: Bruinsforlife
It would cost a first to get rid of steen, goligoski with that retention would be a 2nd and a 4th, so Dunn for that work, plus blues will most likely protect 7-3 and they are forced to protect krug and Faulk and I’m pretty sure they would protect parayko over Dunn wich will result in loosing Dunn anyway


Steens most likely retiring and that being said, the Blues aren't paying a first to remove a guy when he's on the last year of his contract. The blues have zero need for a 35 year old goligoski. All that being said in terms of actual interest from either team it's a wash for both teams because neither team has any need for either player. The blues are protecting Parayko and dunn first and then either krug or faulk depending on how this year goes. Worst case scenario, krug and faulk play up to their level and the blues pay Seattle to take someone like Sammy. My bets on faulk being exposed not dunn
26 nov. 2020 à 13 h 41
#5
STL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 1,633
Quoting: Bruinsforlife
It would cost a first to get rid of steen, goligoski with that retention would be a 2nd and a 4th, so Dunn for that work, plus blues will most likely protect 7-3 and they are forced to protect krug and Faulk and I’m pretty sure they would protect parayko over Dunn wich will result in loosing Dunn anyway


The sheer bald confidence on this man’s entirely incorrect statement
mokumboi a aimé ceci.
26 nov. 2020 à 14 h 20
#6
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,466
Mentions "j'aime": 11,075
Quoting: KingLundqvist30
I didn’t look at it that way. I see it now. For some reason I thought it said ‘Sundqvist’ instead of ‘Steen’.



And that would be 10 times more ludicrous. The Blues would have less than zero interest in any of this.
30 nov. 2020 à 13 h 19
#7
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 926
Quoting: Bruinsforlife
It would cost a first to get rid of steen, goligoski with that retention would be a 2nd and a 4th, so Dunn for that work, plus blues will most likely protect 7-3 and they are forced to protect krug and Faulk and I’m pretty sure they would protect parayko over Dunn wich will result in loosing Dunn anyway


Quoting: KingLundqvist30
I didn’t look at it that way. I see it now. For some reason I thought it said ‘Sundqvist’ instead of ‘Steen’.


You do not have to protect NTC. Only NMC. No one on the Blues will be required to be protected in the expansion draft. The Blues will (or at least should) protect Parayko, Krug, and Dunn in the expansion draft.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage