Forums/Armchair-GM

Granlund Chara and a Training Camp Trade

Créé par: bruinsdude77
Date de création initiale: nov 23, 2020
Publié: 23 nov 2020 à 21 h 55
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Explications
Now that DeBrusk is signed, and to a very fair deal, it becomes more clear how the Bruins can fill out the roster.

By all accounts, Chara is coming back. While many people say that he is waiting to see how the league is formatted this season, I think he was actually taking some time to decide if he was willing to return to Boston in a more limited role. It sounds like he is and he should be compensated as such. I expect a minimum AAV of $700K-$1MM plus performance bonuses.

I also think the Bruins are not content with their scoring. While Hoffman has been the most talked-about target, I think that he can still command $5MM+ on a one-year deal and I am not sure the Bruins can afford that. I think Granlund is a slightly more affordable target and I think he has the ability to play on the top line with Bergeron when Marchand and/or Pastrnak are out and could have instant chemistry with former linemates Coyle and Smith.

I don't believe the Vaakanainen trade rumors. It wouldn't make much sense to deal away a top D prospect who is still waiver exempt when you have an overage of others who are not waiver exempt.

If Chara returns and Miller is healthy, the Bruins will have ten one-way defensemen, though I think Kampfer will safely clear waivers. Obviously McAvoy, Carlo, Grzelcyk, Chara, and Miller would be roster locks. That leaves one starting spot and one or two bench spots open. Moore would be a nice trade candidate and would even make Hoffman a more realistic target if they can trade him without taking salary back. However, Moore will not bring much if anything back in return. If Moore is on the roster, that leaves two spots for three young players, all of whom would likely be claimed on waivers. I personally think people are sleeping on Zboril and I also think the team likes Clifton and the contrast he brings to Miler as a RD3 option. Is Lauzon the odd man out? It could be Zboril, it might be Clifton, or maybe Moore has some value after all. I think the Bruins see how training camp goes and move one rather than lose him on waivers (they could also lose him in expansion). I think RW is the biggest need in the pipeline and I love the fit of Lauzon helping LA now and ****emo helping the Bs down the road.

As for those players who DO go on waivers to be re-assigned to Providence, I don't really think that anyone will be claiming Kampfer, Lindholm, McKegg, Carey, Blidh, or Senyshyn and honestly Senyshyn is the only one of that group that I would really care about getting claimed anyhow.

After all is said and done, the Bs are on the right side of the cap limit and have a pretty balanced lineup. The left side of the D is still weak and I hate seeing Grzelcyk on the top pair, but the hope is that Zboril or Vaakanainen can grow into that role or maybe Moore returns to form. Grz-Carlo is a good second pair and Chara-Miller is a shutdown third pair if they stay healthy. The forward group is great and given the injury questions to Marchand and Pastrnak and the injury history of Kase, I think that Bjork and Studnicka will still see some action. Those early injuries will also help to bank some cap space for down the road. I expect that by the deadline the team will have enough space to add reinforcements on defense if need be. Hjalmarsson, Murray, and McCabe are my preferred rental targets looking down the road a ways.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
Chara, Zdeno1700 000 $
Granlund, Mikael14 000 000 $
Transactions
BOS
  1. Fagemo, Samuel
LAK
  1. Lauzon, Jérémy
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
  • David Backes: 1 500 000 $ (25%)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2021
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
TOR
2022
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
2023
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 842 314 $964 222 $2 730 000 $657 686 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
BOS
Marchand, Brad
6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
BOS
Bergeron, Patrice
6 875 000 $
C
NMC NTC
UFA - 2
BOS
Pastrnak, David
6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
BOS
DeBrusk, Jake
3 675 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
BOS
Krejci, David
7 250 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 1
BOS
Kase, Ondrej
2 600 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Granlund, Mikael
4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
BOS
Coyle, Charlie
5 250 000 $
C, AD
NMC NTC
UFA - 6
BOS
Smith, Craig
3 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
BOS
Ritchie, Nick
1 498 925 $
AG
RFA - 1
BOS
Kuraly, Sean
1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
BOS
Wagner, Chris
1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
BOS
Bjork, Anders
1 600 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
BOS
Grzelcyk, Matt
3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
BOS
McAvoy, Charlie
4 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
BOS
Rask, Tuukka
7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
BOS
Zboril, Jakub
725 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
BOS
Carlo, Brandon
2 850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
BOS
Halák, Jaroslav
2 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Chara, Zdeno
700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
BOS
Miller, Kevan
1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
BOS
Moore, John
2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
BOS
Clifton, Connor
1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
Pastrnak, D.
Bergeron, P.
DeBrusk, J.
McAvoy, C.
Marchand, B.
Avantage numérique 2
Smith, C.
Coyle, C.
Granlund, M.
Krejci, D.
Grzelcyk, M.
Infériorité numérique 1
Kuraly, S.
Wagner, C.
Chara, Z.
Miller, K.
Infériorité numérique 2
Marchand, B.
Bergeron, P.
McAvoy, C.
Carlo, B.

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 nov 2020 à 22 h 03
#1
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 829
Mentions "j'aime": 380
Kings don't need help now they are still rebuilding, they need scoring, and they need it down the road, especially scoring winger like Fagemo. Kings decline, this year they will try Kale Clague or Tobias Bjornfoot into the top 4 defensive LD role.
ZiggyPalffy a aimé ceci.
23 nov 2020 à 22 h 06
#2
bhavikp27
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 7,997
Mentions "j'aime": 3,369
Great explanation and it makes sense.

Disagree for Miller. He isn't a lock. First, if he's 100% ready to go and then, how good would he still be. He hasn't played an NHL game in 21 months, nobody knows how good he'll still be. I believe Clifton, Lauzon are more likely to get that RD3 spot, even Moore (if he's still there).
I also think Chara will return and that Granlund is a better target than Hoffman. That being said, I'm comfortable with the current forward group and imo, Bjork needs to be in the lineup (in the top9 preferably). Studnicka/Senyshyn/Kuhlman can also challenge for a spot so adding another player would block their way.

For the LA trade, I believe they will pass since they have enough dman and Fagemo has more value.
23 nov 2020 à 22 h 09
#3
Bcarlo25
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 17,617
Mentions "j'aime": 5,736
Sounds like both sides hate that trade.
23 nov 2020 à 22 h 30
#4
Rejoint: nov 2018
Messages: 4,882
Mentions "j'aime": 1,126
Better sign one of the ex Sens, Duclair or Hoffman.
23 nov 2020 à 23 h 32
#5
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 10,137
Mentions "j'aime": 3,543
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Sounds like both sides hate that trade.


Only you
Fagemo > Lauzon
Anyone in the league would pick Fagemo over Lauzon
23 nov 2020 à 23 h 37
#6
Bcarlo25
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 17,617
Mentions "j'aime": 5,736
Quoting: GMs
Only you
Fagemo > Lauzon
Anyone in the league would pick Fagemo over Lauzon


But do you understand the notion that some teams want futures, and some teams want NHL players? The bruins are in the latter category.

I would like to add that i don’t think your assessment of the leagues feeling about fagemo is anywhere near accurate.
23 nov 2020 à 23 h 45
#7
Rejoint: jan 2019
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: GMs
Only you
Fagemo > Lauzon
Anyone in the league would pick Fagemo over Lauzon


right now its lauzon > fagemo
24 nov 2020 à 1 h 16
#8
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 10,137
Mentions "j'aime": 3,543
Quoting: KennyBoi
right now its lauzon > fagemo


Lauzon got draft in 2015
Fagemo 2018
No **** Lauzon is more NHL ready
But Fagemo ceiling >> Lauzon ceiling
24 nov 2020 à 1 h 26
#9
Rejoint: jan 2019
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: GMs
Lauzon got draft in 2015
Fagemo 2018
No **** Lauzon is more NHL ready
But Fagemo ceiling >> Lauzon ceiling


Ok glad we got things clarified, bc lauzon is more important to BOS than fagemo hence y BOS doesnt do that trade
GMs a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage