SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Granlund Chara and a Training Camp Trade

Créé par: bruinsdude77
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 23 nov. 2020
Publié: 23 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Now that DeBrusk is signed, and to a very fair deal, it becomes more clear how the Bruins can fill out the roster.

By all accounts, Chara is coming back. While many people say that he is waiting to see how the league is formatted this season, I think he was actually taking some time to decide if he was willing to return to Boston in a more limited role. It sounds like he is and he should be compensated as such. I expect a minimum AAV of $700K-$1MM plus performance bonuses.

I also think the Bruins are not content with their scoring. While Hoffman has been the most talked-about target, I think that he can still command $5MM+ on a one-year deal and I am not sure the Bruins can afford that. I think Granlund is a slightly more affordable target and I think he has the ability to play on the top line with Bergeron when Marchand and/or Pastrnak are out and could have instant chemistry with former linemates Coyle and Smith.

I don't believe the Vaakanainen trade rumors. It wouldn't make much sense to deal away a top D prospect who is still waiver exempt when you have an overage of others who are not waiver exempt.

If Chara returns and Miller is healthy, the Bruins will have ten one-way defensemen, though I think Kampfer will safely clear waivers. Obviously McAvoy, Carlo, Grzelcyk, Chara, and Miller would be roster locks. That leaves one starting spot and one or two bench spots open. Moore would be a nice trade candidate and would even make Hoffman a more realistic target if they can trade him without taking salary back. However, Moore will not bring much if anything back in return. If Moore is on the roster, that leaves two spots for three young players, all of whom would likely be claimed on waivers. I personally think people are sleeping on Zboril and I also think the team likes Clifton and the contrast he brings to Miler as a RD3 option. Is Lauzon the odd man out? It could be Zboril, it might be Clifton, or maybe Moore has some value after all. I think the Bruins see how training camp goes and move one rather than lose him on waivers (they could also lose him in expansion). I think RW is the biggest need in the pipeline and I love the fit of Lauzon helping LA now and ****emo helping the Bs down the road.

As for those players who DO go on waivers to be re-assigned to Providence, I don't really think that anyone will be claiming Kampfer, Lindholm, McKegg, Carey, Blidh, or Senyshyn and honestly Senyshyn is the only one of that group that I would really care about getting claimed anyhow.

After all is said and done, the Bs are on the right side of the cap limit and have a pretty balanced lineup. The left side of the D is still weak and I hate seeing Grzelcyk on the top pair, but the hope is that Zboril or Vaakanainen can grow into that role or maybe Moore returns to form. Grz-Carlo is a good second pair and Chara-Miller is a shutdown third pair if they stay healthy. The forward group is great and given the injury questions to Marchand and Pastrnak and the injury history of Kase, I think that Bjork and Studnicka will still see some action. Those early injuries will also help to bank some cap space for down the road. I expect that by the deadline the team will have enough space to add reinforcements on defense if need be. Hjalmarsson, Murray, and McCabe are my preferred rental targets looking down the road a ways.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
14 000 000 $
Transactions
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 842 314 $964 222 $2 000 000 $657 686 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
G
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 nov. 2020 à 22 h 3
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,430
Mentions "j'aime": 4,487
Kings don't need help now they are still rebuilding, they need scoring, and they need it down the road, especially scoring winger like Fagemo. Kings decline, this year they will try Kale Clague or Tobias Bjornfoot into the top 4 defensive LD role.
ZiggyPalffy a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2020 à 22 h 6
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Great explanation and it makes sense.

Disagree for Miller. He isn't a lock. First, if he's 100% ready to go and then, how good would he still be. He hasn't played an NHL game in 21 months, nobody knows how good he'll still be. I believe Clifton, Lauzon are more likely to get that RD3 spot, even Moore (if he's still there).
I also think Chara will return and that Granlund is a better target than Hoffman. That being said, I'm comfortable with the current forward group and imo, Bjork needs to be in the lineup (in the top9 preferably). Studnicka/Senyshyn/Kuhlman can also challenge for a spot so adding another player would block their way.

For the LA trade, I believe they will pass since they have enough dman and Fagemo has more value.
23 nov. 2020 à 22 h 9
#3
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,147
Mentions "j'aime": 6,987
Sounds like both sides hate that trade.
23 nov. 2020 à 22 h 30
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 9,160
Mentions "j'aime": 2,223
Better sign one of the ex Sens, Duclair or Hoffman.
23 nov. 2020 à 23 h 32
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Sounds like both sides hate that trade.


Only you
Fagemo > Lauzon
Anyone in the league would pick Fagemo over Lauzon
23 nov. 2020 à 23 h 37
#6
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,147
Mentions "j'aime": 6,987
Quoting: GMs
Only you
Fagemo > Lauzon
Anyone in the league would pick Fagemo over Lauzon


But do you understand the notion that some teams want futures, and some teams want NHL players? The bruins are in the latter category.

I would like to add that i don’t think your assessment of the leagues feeling about fagemo is anywhere near accurate.
23 nov. 2020 à 23 h 45
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,724
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: GMs
Only you
Fagemo > Lauzon
Anyone in the league would pick Fagemo over Lauzon


right now its lauzon > fagemo
24 nov. 2020 à 1 h 16
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: KennyBoi
right now its lauzon > fagemo


Lauzon got draft in 2015
Fagemo 2018
No **** Lauzon is more NHL ready
But Fagemo ceiling >> Lauzon ceiling
24 nov. 2020 à 1 h 26
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,724
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: GMs
Lauzon got draft in 2015
Fagemo 2018
No **** Lauzon is more NHL ready
But Fagemo ceiling >> Lauzon ceiling


Ok glad we got things clarified, bc lauzon is more important to BOS than fagemo hence y BOS doesnt do that trade
GMs a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage