SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How to turn this team into a contender

Créé par: Maxmax2005
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 19 nov. 2020
Publié: 19 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
15 000 000 $
Transactions
PIT
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
LAK
  1. Matheson, Michael
Détails additionnels:
LA's defence is HORRID right now, Matheson could help, even though he comes at a hefty price(contract)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de CGY
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 106 842 $0 $850 000 $3 393 158 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 nov. 2020 à 23 h 0
#1
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,133
Mentions "j'aime": 20,442
If only it was that easy to dump 30m$
19 nov. 2020 à 23 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
id rather granland
19 nov. 2020 à 23 h 2
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: SevenLeg
If only it was that easy to dump 30m$


let him have a good season in pit, and have Seattle take him
HockeyTownUSA69 a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2020 à 23 h 2
#4
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,585
Mentions "j'aime": 1,128
AS LONG AS WE HAVE CROSBY AND MALKIN WE WILL ALWAYS BE A CONTENDING TEAM!! (If we lose Crosby and Malkin, then... idk... I'll be heart broken. Might never watch hockey again. cry)
mhockey91 et HockeyTownUSA69 a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2020 à 23 h 4
#5
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,133
Mentions "j'aime": 20,442
Quoting: mhockey91
let him have a good season in pit, and have Seattle take him


Even then, I doubt they do pick him unless they get a sweetener. Just like if Justin Faulk bounces back. Those kind of contracts are just too big.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2020 à 23 h 22
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,602
Mentions "j'aime": 1,592
No thanks. Gotta live with your GMs mistake... and I’m glad the kings have a horrible D. Top 5 pick (one of the great D prospects) next year and in a year or two contend.
tryger a aimé ceci.
20 nov. 2020 à 0 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,427
Kings are not paying for Matheson, cap space is worth so much right now, for instance, the Kings could get Hoffman at $5.5 for one year, flip him at the deadline with 50% retained and teams would give up a first.
20 nov. 2020 à 1 h 15
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: tryger
Kings are not paying for Matheson, cap space is worth so much right now, for instance, the Kings could get Hoffman at $5.5 for one year, flip him at the deadline with 50% retained and teams would give up a first.


That's why Hoffman isn't signing with LA
20 nov. 2020 à 1 h 20
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: KINGS67
No thanks. Gotta live with your GMs mistake... and I’m glad the kings have a horrible D. Top 5 pick (one of the great D prospects) next year and in a year or two contend.


Quoting: SevenLeg
Even then, I doubt they do pick him unless they get a sweetener. Just like if Justin Faulk bounces back. Those kind of contracts are just too big.


people said the same thing about Gudbranson, he's been moved twice now.

There is talent there, there is always a need for defense. This is an easier to move contract that people think.
He's a top 4 D man, His salary isn't bad for that and the term could be viewed as a good thing given that and the raising costs that will eventually be coming with a new TV deal.

Not saying LA is the right team for that, but they will be able to move him next year.
HockeyTownUSA69 et Maxmax2005 a aimé ceci.
20 nov. 2020 à 1 h 35
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,427
Quoting: pharrow
That's why Hoffman isn't signing with LA


That's fine, Hoffman has asked for $5.5-6M, he's open to one year. Many teams can't do that unless they can shed contracts, and teams with space know that they can squeeze more out of teams the longer they wait. The Kings don't care about signing Hoffman or finding the perfect fit defenseman, they are rebuilding and see several teams that need immediate cap relief and will leverage their cap space from now until the trade deadline to the highest bidder. That is why this trade proposal takes away their biggest strength and handcuffs them long term.
20 nov. 2020 à 2 h 8
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: KINGS67
No thanks. Gotta live with your GMs mistake... and I’m glad the kings have a horrible D. Top 5 pick (one of the great D prospects) next year and in a year or two contend.


Believe me, Matheson will not be a mistake in Pittsburgh. Can’t wait for him to prove you all wrong,
HockeyTownUSA69 a aimé ceci.
20 nov. 2020 à 5 h 24
#12
LETS go PENS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 529
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Quoting: SevenLeg
Even then, I doubt they do pick him unless they get a sweetener. Just like if Justin Faulk bounces back. Those kind of contracts are just too big.


Quoting: mhockey91
Believe me, Matheson will not be a mistake in Pittsburgh. Can’t wait for him to prove you all wrong,


4M isn’t a hefty price tag. It’s the term that is bad. Find a Defense worth anything under 4M, not on an EL contract. go!!
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
20 nov. 2020 à 7 h 13
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: SevenLeg
Even then, I doubt they do pick him unless they get a sweetener. Just like if Justin Faulk bounces back. Those kind of contracts are just too big.


Like Josh Anderson's contract?
20 nov. 2020 à 8 h 1
#14
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,133
Mentions "j'aime": 20,442
Modifié 20 nov. 2020 à 8 h 12
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Like Josh Anderson's contract?


Yes. Good luck moving him until he proves that he's worth it multiple seasons in a row.
20 nov. 2020 à 8 h 11
#15
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,133
Mentions "j'aime": 20,442
Quoting: mhockey91
Believe me, Matheson will not be a mistake in Pittsburgh. Can’t wait for him to prove you all wrong,


Well I hope you're right. I've always liked the guy.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
20 nov. 2020 à 8 h 26
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: tryger
That's fine, Hoffman has asked for $5.5-6M, he's open to one year. Many teams can't do that unless they can shed contracts, and teams with space know that they can squeeze more out of teams the longer they wait. The Kings don't care about signing Hoffman or finding the perfect fit defenseman, they are rebuilding and see several teams that need immediate cap relief and will leverage their cap space from now until the trade deadline to the highest bidder. That is why this trade proposal takes away their biggest strength and handcuffs them long term.


you are saying this like you are bitter. No free agent is signing a 1 year deal somewhere just to be traded to play somewhere else mid season or whatever. It is what it is.
And no one LA included is giving him that which is why he's unsigned. He'll get 3.5-4 range most likely because teams don't like the 5v5 production.
20 nov. 2020 à 9 h 50
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
There is talent there, there is always a need for defense. This is an easier to move contract that people think.
He's a top 4 D man, His salary isn't bad for that and the term could be viewed as a good thing given that and the raising costs that will eventually be coming with a new TV deal.

Not saying LA is the right team for that, but they will be able to move him next year.[/quote]

At best hes a third pair dman on a terrible contract. No ones taking that contract for free.
20 nov. 2020 à 9 h 51
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: HockeyTownUSA69
4M isn’t a hefty price tag. It’s the term that is bad. Find a Defense worth anything under 4M, not on an EL contract. go!!


Pelech, mayfield just off the top of my head
20 nov. 2020 à 9 h 53
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: mhockey91
Believe me, Matheson will not be a mistake in Pittsburgh. Can’t wait for him to prove you all wrong,


Keep waiting for matheson to lead you to the playoffs. Youll still be waiting in 2035 lol
20 nov. 2020 à 10 h 37
#20
LETS go PENS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 529
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Pelech, mayfield just off the top of my head


Yep, and Carlo and Ekholm..there’s about 4 or 5.
20 nov. 2020 à 12 h 32
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,427
Quoting: pharrow
you are saying this like you are bitter. No free agent is signing a 1 year deal somewhere just to be traded to play somewhere else mid season or whatever. It is what it is.
And no one LA included is giving him that which is why he's unsigned. He'll get 3.5-4 range most likely because teams don't like the 5v5 production.


Not bitter at all, I thought it was pretty clear that this is all about a response to this trade thread, the Kings want to use their cap space to get futures, I just used that as an option, I am totally fine with Hoffman signing elsewhere as long as Blake uses the cap space the Kings have to improve the Kings future for when they compete.
20 nov. 2020 à 13 h 46
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Keep waiting for matheson to lead you to the playoffs. Youll still be waiting in 2035 lol


Worry about your own teams D
20 nov. 2020 à 23 h 16
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: tryger
Not bitter at all, I thought it was pretty clear that this is all about a response to this trade thread, the Kings want to use their cap space to get futures, I just used that as an option, I am totally fine with Hoffman signing elsewhere as long as Blake uses the cap space the Kings have to improve the Kings future for when they compete.


teams aren't going to use cap space like that though. There is no money coming in. They are taking loses as is. They aren't going to spend more, are you kidding me.
This is why teams can't dump salary and it's costing an arm and a leg. If there were fans in the seats and a normal year things would be different, but they aren't.
21 nov. 2020 à 2 h 6
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,427
Quoting: pharrow
teams aren't going to use cap space like that though. There is no money coming in. They are taking loses as is. They aren't going to spend more, are you kidding me.
This is why teams can't dump salary and it's costing an arm and a leg. If there were fans in the seats and a normal year things would be different, but they aren't.


I don't think what I am saying is very controversial. AEG is not a poor owner, nor are the Kings a small market team, the team presently has the second-lowest cap hit in the league and is still currently rebuilding. I am not saying the Kings certainly have a trade for a cap dump on the table, just they would be crazy not to get max value anyone that asks for them to take on a cap dump and trades like the one above make no sense in the cap crunch. The cost impacts for the Kings taking on an inflated contract set to end this year or next at the trade deadline are negligible in comparison to the potential long-term dividends of a top 62 pick for a team that saw their team value explode after two cup wins that was successful because of Dean Lombardi trying to get as many picks as possible. But I think there is no convincing you of my logic, so I'll just leave this be.
21 nov. 2020 à 10 h 15
#25
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: tryger
I don't think what I am saying is very controversial. AEG is not a poor owner, nor are the Kings a small market team, the team presently has the second-lowest cap hit in the league and is still currently rebuilding. I am not saying the Kings certainly have a trade for a cap dump on the table, just they would be crazy not to get max value anyone that asks for them to take on a cap dump and trades like the one above make no sense in the cap crunch. The cost impacts for the Kings taking on an inflated contract set to end this year or next at the trade deadline are negligible in comparison to the potential long-term dividends of a top 62 pick for a team that saw their team value explode after two cup wins that was successful because of Dean Lombardi trying to get as many picks as possible. But I think there is no convincing you of my logic, so I'll just leave this be.


In 18-19 the kings made 54 million operating revenue.
So no they aren't a "small" market team. But that's with people coming into the arena.
They don't have that anymore. Every team is reporting to take a loss this year. Every single one. And it is reportedly substantial.
You can only bleed so much cash.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage