Quoting: HabsForEver
So would I'd rather a very good 3rd liner for 3 more years or a below fringe NHLer for 1 year?
You realize you can't win a cup with a team full of 21 YO's
None of your post is accurate at all.
Byron isn’t a very good 3rd liner, he’s a decent bottom6, but his production, 10 points in 29 games is closer to 4th line than 3rd line, therefore, Byron is a very good 4th liner.
Byron is 31, so he’s not improving, in fact he’s entering his decline years. What will Byron’s production be when he’s 31 or 32, and then 33? With a cap hit of $3.4MM, that’s just too much for a 31/32/33 year old declining bottom6 winger. There’s too much term. If Byron only had one year left on his contract, he’d be worth much more in a trade. As a player gets into his 30’s, term is bad when they’re declining and make too much for their contribution.
If Byron only had one year left, he’d be worth more than Anisimov, maybe. Anisimov is still a decent player, and should out produce Byron, maybe, no one knows for sure.
On a one year contract, blocking prospects is a moot point, but at three seasons, it’s a negative for Byron if he’s offered to Ottawa. 23 year old Balcers would be the player Byron blocked.
Team full of 21 year olds, this is called rhetoric, an attempt to create an image without proof.
Brady Tkachuk is the only definite 21 or under that will start the season on this team. Stuetzle is a possibility at 19, but he has a European contract he must fulfill. Logan Brown and Batherson are both 22, that’s possibly three players. Chabot and White are 23.
Montreal has Kotkaniemi, Suzuki, and Romanov, as well as Mete at 22, which is more than Ottawa.
Norris, Brannstrom, and Formenton should start the season in the AHL, just like Batherson and Brown did last season.
There’s no point in continuing, Ottawa just isn’t a good destination for Byron.