SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This is still a good team and contender

Créé par: dsmitts01
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 12 nov. 2020
Publié: 12 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 490 211 $1 700 000 $4 550 000 $3 009 789 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 nov. 2020 à 15 h 9
#1
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Ehhhh
12 nov. 2020 à 15 h 15
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,883
Mentions "j'aime": 6,389
They're a playoff team but they aren't a cup contender unless Demko turns into 2006 Luongo
12 nov. 2020 à 15 h 23
#3
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,416
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
That bottom 6 is awful. They’re a playoff team but that’s about it.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
12 nov. 2020 à 15 h 33
#4
Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 836
Mentions "j'aime": 349
Its going to come down to two things IMO how this season goes:
1. Can they get a similar level of goaltending they got last year
2. Can they get a player or two out of their 4 young Dmen

People tend to bash this teams forward group a lot, but theyre the most underrated element of this team and is deeper than they are given credit for. With Baertschi/ Lind in the AHL, and the addition of Podkolzin or Hoglander later in the season they should be able to survive injuries up front. Im not as confident about the blueline though, imagine this team without 2 of their top 4 dmen? Might be rough.
12 nov. 2020 à 15 h 49
#5
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: Jah1722
That bottom 6 is awful. They’re a playoff team but that’s about it.


Agree to disagree all 6 guys are great forecheckers and defensively responsible
12 nov. 2020 à 15 h 54
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Contender is a stretch imo. Virtanen’s gonna need to pot at least 30 to make up for Toffoli’s loss, and that’s just to stay on par with last season. An injury to Schmidt or Hughes would also be devastating. I don’t hate the bottom six as players (yes they’re overpaid in general but they’re majority still useful NHL players) but it’s certainly not a strength, and they will most likely heavily rely on the top 6 to carry the offensive load. The 3rd pair is also a glaring risk imo, neither guy is proven yet and both will have to step up to some degree to make this team a contender. Not to mention Holtby is a significant downgrade from Markstrom and Vancouver’s style of giving up a lot of shots will not help him bounce back. I think they’re probably a wildcard team in the 7-9 range in the conference but not a contender unless a lot of things go right and they have no injuries.
12 nov. 2020 à 15 h 58
#7
nhn1405
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 704
Mentions "j'aime": 162
this isnt even a playoff team bro. and if it is, its BARELY a playoff team
CD282 a aimé ceci.
12 nov. 2020 à 16 h 5
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,003
Mentions "j'aime": 7,734
Quoting: nhn1405
this isnt even a playoff team bro. and if it is, its BARELY a playoff team


I think you're right. They finished 16th last year and are worse this year.
12 nov. 2020 à 16 h 53
#9
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,416
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Agree to disagree all 6 guys are great forecheckers and defensively responsible


That bottom 6 is full of 4th liners. It’s bad.
12 nov. 2020 à 20 h 38
#10
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: Jah1722
That bottom 6 is full of 4th liners. It’s bad.


Guadette and roussel are both bonafide 3rd liners
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage