SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Wilson Fired before the 2020-21 TDL

Créé par: yikes
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 10 nov. 2020
Publié: 10 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just a example of a situation where Wilson is fired before TDL (lets say 20 games before TDL and the sharks are abysmal).
Blow her up.

2020 offseason remainders:
Ruuta signing
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
TDL or Waiver Claim replacement, Some
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. DeKeyser, Danny
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (DET)
Détails additionnels:
Example - this is literally just a random team I selected. Let’s say Detroit’s playing well (not dead last), and they wanna see if they can win some more games.
DET
  1. Burns, Brent
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
Let’s say defensively Burns is playing slightly better than last year and on pace for like 55-60 points in 82 games. Reasonable assumptions.
2.
SJS
    Two seconds - moved of salary - 3 extra years on burns’ contract compared to dekeyser and a third coming back doesn’t seem like a bad trade. Not great for the sharks imo but I also believe it’s not great for Detroit so I guess it’s close to reasonable.
    DET
    3.
    SJS
    DET
      I know dekeyser could be a IR situation if he gets injured again/ aggravates his disc injury but for now he’s off the books completely and they have a useable player in burns seeing top4 time easily.
      4.
      SJS
      1. Patrick, Nolan
      2. van Riemsdyk, James
      3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
      Détails additionnels:
      Patrick + a first - JVR for balance. Patrick plus a first seems like something the flyers may not entertain but this puts them in a position where they’d be an easy favourite to come out of the east with a playoff performer like couture.
      Nolan is as much as a reclamation project as any as the sharks could be getting a guy who either plays well or doesn’t even play potentially due to chronic injuries.
      5.
      SJS
        THE ABOVE 2 TRADES ARE DONE AT TDL

        DET = Actually around or above .500 due to Greiss playing well and Detroit’s good offseason (not a playoff team but could make a wildcard push, unlikely tho)

        PHI = Competing for 1st seed in the metro and the first likely to be a late 20 or final 4 selection.
        PHI
          THE ABOVE 2 TRADES ARE DONE AT TDL

          DET = Actually around or above .500 due to Greiss playing well and Detroit’s good offseason (not a playoff team but could make a wildcard push, unlikely tho)

          PHI = Competing for 1st seed in the metro and the first likely to be a late 20 or final 4 selection.
          6.
          SJS
            Situations/ trades are unlikely (both couture and burns have a say in trades and would likely decline both/ couture may accept, burns less likely).
            PHI
              Situations/ trades are unlikely (both couture and burns have a say in trades and would likely decline both/ couture may accept, burns less likely).
              7.
              SJS
                ~~Expansion situation~~

                Protection List:
                Meier Hertl Labanc Kane Donato Handemark Patrick

                Simek Karlsson (NMC) Vlasic (NMC)
                [Merkley, Ferraro are exempt]

                Dubnyk

                Exposed:
                Kellman, Gregor, JVR, Gambrell, Noesen, Nieto, Sorensen, Marleau, Ruuta, Jones, Suomela, Middleton
                PHI
                  ~~Expansion situation~~

                  Protection List:
                  Meier Hertl Labanc Kane Donato Handemark Patrick

                  Simek Karlsson (NMC) Vlasic (NMC)
                  [Merkley, Ferraro are exempt]

                  Dubnyk

                  Exposed:
                  Kellman, Gregor, JVR, Gambrell, Noesen, Nieto, Sorensen, Marleau, Ruuta, Jones, Suomela, Middleton
                  8.
                  SJS
                    ~~SEATTLE KRAKEN TRADE~~

                    San Jose Sends:

                    1st(PHI) (21’)
                    2nd(EDM) (21’)
                    2nd(SJS) (22’)
                    Ivan Chekhovich
                    Matt Nieto

                    To Seattle For:

                    Future Considerations
                    The Selection of Martin Jones

                    Martin Jones is selected in the draft
                    PHI
                    1. Chekhovich, Ivan
                    2. Jones, Martin
                    3. Nieto, Matt
                    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
                    5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
                    6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
                    Détails additionnels:
                    ~~SEATTLE KRAKEN TRADE~~

                    San Jose Sends:

                    1st(PHI) (21’)
                    2nd(EDM) (21’)
                    2nd(SJS) (22’)
                    Ivan Chekhovich
                    Matt Nieto

                    To Seattle For:

                    Future Considerations
                    The Selection of Martin Jones

                    Martin Jones is selected in the draft
                    9.
                    SJS
                      Assumption that Jones plays out of his MIND in 2020/2021 and puts up like .900 sv% and 3.00 GAA or something that’s somewhat reasonable lmfao
                      PHI
                        Assumption that Jones plays out of his MIND in 2020/2021 and puts up like a .900 sv% and 3.00 GAA or something that’s somewhat reasonable lmfao
                        Enfoui
                        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
                        2021
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de DET
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        2022
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de MIN
                        2023
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        Logo de SJS
                        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
                        2481 500 000 $66 814 958 $0 $710 000 $14 685 042 $
                        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
                        AG, AD
                        UFA - 3
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
                        C
                        M-NTC
                        UFA - 2
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
                        AD, AG
                        UFA - 4
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
                        AG, AD
                        M-NTC
                        UFA - 5
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
                        C
                        UFA - 1
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
                        AG, C, AD
                        UFA - 1
                        Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
                        7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
                        AG, AD
                        UFA - 3
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        750 000 $750 000 $
                        C
                        UFA - 2
                        Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
                        874 125 $874 125 $
                        C, AD
                        UFA - 1
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
                        AG, AD
                        RFA - 1
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        700 000 $700 000 $
                        AG, C
                        UFA - 1
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
                        AG, AD
                        UFA - 1
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        700 000 $700 000 $
                        C
                        UFA - 1
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        925 000 $925 000 $
                        AG, AD
                        UFA - 1
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        700 000 $700 000 $
                        C
                        UFA - 1
                        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
                        DG/DD
                        UFA - 4
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
                        DD
                        NMC
                        UFA - 7
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
                        G
                        M-NTC
                        UFA - 1
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
                        DG
                        UFA - 2
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
                        DD
                        UFA - 3
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        725 000 $725 000 $
                        DG
                        UFA - 2
                        1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
                        DG/DD
                        UFA - 2
                        TDL or Waiver Claim replacement, Some
                        1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
                        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                        7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
                        DG/DD
                        NMC
                        UFA - 6

                        Code d'intégration

                        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
                        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

                        Texte intégré

                        Cliquer pour surligner
                        10 nov. 2020 à 19 h 41
                        #1
                        Avatar de l'utilisateur
                        Rejoint: mai 2019
                        Messages: 978
                        Mentions "j'aime": 228
                        Wilson's not going anywhere
                        10 nov. 2020 à 19 h 42
                        #2
                        Démarrer sujet
                        EklundCelebriniSmith
                        Avatar de l'utilisateur
                        Rejoint: sept. 2019
                        Messages: 10,059
                        Mentions "j'aime": 12,817
                        Quoting: sharks_1999
                        Wilson's not going anywhere


                        Didn’t say he was lol - just a “example” of situation in a world where he is
                        JToller1 a aimé ceci.
                        10 nov. 2020 à 19 h 57
                        #3
                        J. Toller
                        Avatar de l'utilisateur
                        Rejoint: févr. 2020
                        Messages: 635
                        Mentions "j'aime": 151
                        He tried to keep that group together and he failed miserably. Having to give up their heart and soul in Joe Pavelski and a solid depth player in Joonas Donskoi for a huge liability in Karlsson.
                        10 nov. 2020 à 20 h 38
                        #4
                        Avatar de l'utilisateur
                        Rejoint: déc. 2017
                        Messages: 21,623
                        Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
                        Detroit passes with where they are at in their rebuild they won't being buying at the TDL for a few more seasons. I don't think Detroit trade DeKeyser he doesn't put up a lot points but he is a very good defensive defenseman. One thing even people who don't follow the Wing's can see is Yzerman is hoarding draft picks and I don't see him trading 2 2nds for a 35yr old defenseman who comes with a cap hit of $8M until he is 40. DeKeyser has been skating and intends on being on the opening night roster now how well he plays is a different situation. The last NHL game he played was on 10/22/2019 and had back surgery during that time. I know it said could be any team but after reading the very thorough explanations I wanted to reply from Detroit's POV.
                        OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
                        10 nov. 2020 à 20 h 48
                        #5
                        LongtimeLeafsufferer
                        Avatar de l'utilisateur
                        Rejoint: juill. 2015
                        Messages: 59,406
                        Mentions "j'aime": 22,627
                        Wow, all that written for one post. It really should have stopped with Burns virtual MMC (three team trade list), not waiving for the Wings.
                        OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
                        11 nov. 2020 à 4 h 51
                        #6
                        Avatar de l'utilisateur
                        Rejoint: août 2018
                        Messages: 6,311
                        Mentions "j'aime": 2,227
                        I think if those things are true about PHI fighting for 1st in the Metro at the deadline, I cant see them moving two forwards who had gotten them there, especially Patrick.

                        However if Patrick isn't playing and hasn't helped team to compete for 1st in Metro, (which means he hasn't overcome migraine disorder after 2 years of not playing, then his future is nil) then I could see PHI doing this, but why would SJ?
                        11 nov. 2020 à 7 h 56
                        #7
                        Démarrer sujet
                        EklundCelebriniSmith
                        Avatar de l'utilisateur
                        Rejoint: sept. 2019
                        Messages: 10,059
                        Mentions "j'aime": 12,817
                        Quoting: Hammerwise
                        I think if those things are true about PHI fighting for 1st in the Metro at the deadline, I cant see them moving two forwards who had gotten them there, especially Patrick.

                        However if Patrick isn't playing and hasn't helped team to compete for 1st in Metro, (which means he hasn't overcome migraine disorder after 2 years of not playing, then his future is nil) then I could see PHI doing this, but why would SJ?


                        The assumption is phi is in the position to win; and Patrick is playing (well I guess idk), but he didn’t play at all in 2019/2020. And it’s not like he’s lighting it up just continuing good play. It wouldn’t be a great move for the sharks but it’s also a suspect move for PHI as if Patrick gets his health around he could become a very reliable and good forward by 24/25 if he can keep good health up and actually develop the way he was supposed to. And for Philly they choose to not risk that and get value out of Patrick and a first for couture with JVR being decent but slightly overpaid whereas couture comes in at comfortable 8 and even if he puts up 65 points in 82 games, he’ll provide more than his worth in the playoffs.

                        I just picked random teams so it’s not like everything is dead on. I also wouldn’t pick frost, farabee, and forester so I just choose Patrick who’s more of a toss up in value
                        Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
                        11 nov. 2020 à 8 h 4
                        #8
                        Avatar de l'utilisateur
                        Rejoint: août 2018
                        Messages: 6,311
                        Mentions "j'aime": 2,227
                        Quoting: yikes
                        The assumption is phi is in the position to win; and Patrick is playing (well I guess idk), but he didn’t play at all in 2019/2020. And it’s not like he’s lighting it up just continuing good play. It wouldn’t be a great move for the sharks but it’s also a suspect move for PHI as if Patrick gets his health around he could become a very reliable and good forward by 24/25 if he can keep good health up and actually develop the way he was supposed to. And for Philly they choose to not risk that and get value out of Patrick and a first for couture with JVR being decent but slightly overpaid whereas couture comes in at comfortable 8 and even if he puts up 65 points in 82 games, he’ll provide more than his worth in the playoffs.

                        I just picked random teams so it’s not like everything is dead on. I also wouldn’t pick frost, farabee, and forester so I just choose Patrick who’s more of a toss up in value


                        Oh I don't disagree, but if Patrick is playing and playing well, they don't move him. If Patrick isn't playing due to his current medical reasons or playing poorly throughout season towards the deadline, then I doubt SJ wants him.

                        And that contract at 31 years old, ooof! JVR might not be worth 7mil, but at least its only 3 yrs, and it'll expire when JVR is 34. Couture? Wowza! Just cant see Philly taking a huge, long term contract. 7 more years at 8 mil? Never happen.

                        Philly will trade for someone who is a UFA to be is more likely
                        yikes a aimé ceci.
                         
                        Répondre
                        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
                        Question:
                        Options:
                        Ajouter une option
                        Soumettre le sondage