Modifié 10 nov. 2020 à 9 h 59
Quoting: Wqrrior
This response is about as useless as a bald guy buying hairspray for himself.
I'm open to being proven wrong, and I can take criticism when it is justified. If your 677 other posts are as useless as this one then why bother posting here?
That's not an acceptable package for Dumba and trading with Pittsburgh makes absolutely no sense. Rust may have had the better season but that was much more of an exception than the rule. & Dumba looked improved in the bubble. Rust is also is older and won't have elite centre play in Minnesota. He is also a winger, something Minnesota shouldn't be worried about acquiring with a big trade chip like Dumba.
So from every angle, that deal is not good for Minnesota & PIT doesn't even have a need at RHD either plus it's selling low on Dumba while Pittsburgh is selling high on Rust. No. Thank. You.
The Arizona deal is also not worth it for Minnesota. Selling low on Khovanov due to his rough start in Russia and targeting a guy with higher valur than he should die to his importance to AZ. and Khovanov has the potential to maybe even be better than Dvorak.
If we're making a big trade for someone to be our 1C AND moving Dumba, why the he'll are they separate deals? Why are we putting ourselves in these extremely risky situations? It makes absolutely no sense.
Minnesota is selling low on the key pieces they are giving up for overvalued pieces from the teams they are trading with, getting older, and not even clearing cap. What is Minnesota doing here? Trying to contend without being real contenders? Is it 2016-17 again? Are they trying to here? Cause it looks like they're trying to continue to be mediocre by pushing to be better too early again.
Oh yeah, and they dont even sell high on theyre own guy, Stalock
And the signings aren't good either. The Wild have players for those spots. Overall this wouldn't be a well thought out string of moves that would probably end with even more fans calling for Guerin's head