SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Lastest rumour about Gaudreau fair offer

Créé par: NickDerose
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 6 nov. 2020
Publié: 6 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
With the lastest rumour in the interest of MTL in Gaudreau, I tried to figure a trade offer that will be good for both team. Calgary needs to add pieces in the actual line up + add potential prospects and draft picks. They want to add punch and depth without to do a retool. So with Tatar, they actually have a remplacement for Gaudreau and the add of Armia is a really good thing to the depth of their roster with a quality top 9 player. I add a potential B+ prospect in Olofsson (former 2nd round pick in 2018). Where it’s start to be interessing for Calgary is the add of a conditionnal 2nd round pick that will become a 1st round pick in 2022 if MTL achieve to resign him ( I think that MTL has good chance to resign Gaudreau ).
Transactions
CGY
  1. Armia, Joel
  2. Olofsson, Jacob [Liste de réserve]
  3. Tatar, Tomas
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
Conditionnal 2nd round pick
-> if MTL extension Gaudreau contract, 2nd round pick become a 1st round pick
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $69 301 666 $0 $457 500 $12 198 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
875 000 $875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 nov. 2020 à 11 h 17
#1
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,622
Mentions "j'aime": 12,351
Can't do conditions on resigning anymore.
6 nov. 2020 à 11 h 26
#2
Démarrer sujet
DG
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 39
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Can't do conditions on resigning anymore.


Yeah I had this info like 2 mins ago on an another post hahaha
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
6 nov. 2020 à 11 h 33
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 840
Mentions "j'aime": 342
Tatar had more goals than Gaudreau last year, and is the better player defensively. On top of that his cap hit is less. Why is Montreal adding multiple pieces to this deal?
NickDerose a aimé ceci.
6 nov. 2020 à 11 h 35
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 2,088
Mentions "j'aime": 686
Flames 10000% decline if you want gaudreau it starts with Suzuki
6 nov. 2020 à 11 h 41
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 2,081
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Quoting: flamesfan
Flames 10000% decline if you want gaudreau it starts with Suzuki


No, I don't think...
that_onehabsfan et NickDerose a aimé ceci.
6 nov. 2020 à 12 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 39
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: gmurrayt
Tatar had more goals than Gaudreau last year, and is the better player defensively. On top of that his cap hit is less. Why is Montreal adding multiple pieces to this deal?


Tatar is older , ufa next year has 347 pts in 9 years . Gaudreau has 444 pts in 6 years.
6 nov. 2020 à 12 h 32
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,404
Mentions "j'aime": 6,374
Quoting: busdriver
Tatar is older , ufa next year has 347 pts in 9 years . Gaudreau has 444 pts in 6 years.


Gaudreau has been in trade rumours for the last 2 or 3 years. Suzuki would not ever be part of a package for him for a few reasons. 1. Montreal has the centers they have been missing for the last 20+ years they are not depleting that for a winger. 2. Suzuki is younger with a higher ceiling and Gaudreau is already rumoured to be heading to Philly in 2 years so he is essentially a rental. 3. The Habs are at the cap limit so including Suzuki + 2 more roster players to make room for Gaudreau is just stupid overpay. We would have to clear 6 Mil to fit him Suzuki only clears 800+ k no way we move 3 roster players for 1 that defeats everything that has been done this off season by MB.
NickDerose a aimé ceci.
6 nov. 2020 à 14 h 9
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: gmurrayt
Tatar had more goals than Gaudreau last year, and is the better player defensively. On top of that his cap hit is less. Why is Montreal adding multiple pieces to this deal?


Found the guy that learned about hockey on EA!!
6 nov. 2020 à 17 h 59
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 840
Mentions "j'aime": 342
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Found the guy that learned about hockey on EA!!


Solid counter point. I guess you really explained why the player who is at least equal in the offensive end, better in the defensive end, and cheaper against the cap has vastly inferior value because of 1 year remaining on a contract instead of 2 years. Silly me thinking performance on the ice and dollar value of the contract should be major considerations.
NickDerose a aimé ceci.
10 nov. 2020 à 17 h 3
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: gmurrayt
Solid counter point. I guess you really explained why the player who is at least equal in the offensive end, better in the defensive end, and cheaper against the cap has vastly inferior value because of 1 year remaining on a contract instead of 2 years. Silly me thinking performance on the ice and dollar value of the contract should be major considerations.


No, silly you is comparing a .95 PPG to a .60 PPG. That alone should get you laughed out of any room with any sensical hockey fan. To say "at least equal in the offensive zone" should get you laughed out of rooms with even nonsensical hockey fans. And then to whine, fill your diaper and say "oh silly me" like a hard done by little goof should have you laughed out of rooms with soccer fans.
Tatar surpassed 60 points this year by one point, that's only three more points than Gaudreau's absolutely worst season in the league, only two other seasons has Tatar had more than 50 points, other than this year Gaudreau has never been below 60. And then Tatar being older, a worse skater and turning 30 in a contract year are all just starting points as to why this is a joke of a deal, renegotiating with Tatar who has been bounced around the league and will ask for 6+ in a flat cap season would be horrible for any team in the league, I would rather see Gaudreau walk for nothing than extend Tatar after next season. Gaudreau is at his lowest value, Tatar is at his absolute peak right now and they're still not even close.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage