SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Some Fine-Tuning For Opening Night

Créé par: Pond_Duck
Équipe: 2020-21 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 30 oct. 2020
Publié: 30 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Where do you think this team finishes, Are they better than last years Caps?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
2750 000 $
Transactions
WSH
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (DET)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de VGK
Logo de WSH
2022
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de DET
Logo de WSH
2023
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $70 589 878 $419 749 $600 000 $10 910 122 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 oct. 2020 à 15 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Detroit doesn’t need anymore bottom pairing defenders.
buffbry et Pond_Duck a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2020 à 15 h 31
#2
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,905
Mentions "j'aime": 5,342
Wings pass, makes no sense from a wings point of view
Pond_Duck a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2020 à 16 h 41
#3
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,261
Mentions "j'aime": 4,353
Quoting: BStinson
Detroit doesn’t need anymore bottom pairing defenders.


Weird take considering is he was a top pairing D man in Detroit 1.5 years ago
Pond_Duck a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2020 à 17 h 3
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Weird take considering is he was a top pairing D man in Detroit 1.5 years ago

I’d wager most consider him a solid #5 and comparing his utilization on a bottom feeding team. He wouldn’t start over Hronek or Seider so yeah 3rd pair guy, lots of things can change in 1.5 years. Also with the addition of Stetcher you’re really grasping at straws here. You consider Zaitsev a top pairing guy also?
Pond_Duck a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2020 à 19 h 34
#5
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,261
Mentions "j'aime": 4,353
Quoting: BStinson
I’d wager most consider him a solid #5 and comparing his utilization on a bottom feeding team. He wouldn’t start over Hronek or Seider so yeah 3rd pair guy, lots of things can change in 1.5 years. Also with the addition of Stetcher you’re really grasping at straws here. You consider Zaitsev a top pairing guy also?


Just wondering why you consider him a bottom pairing Dman. He’s struggled in Washington but idk if I would consider him or label him as strictly a bottom pairing guy. Seems a little harsh/ premature. He looked really solid last part of the year for Washington. Shatty got BO of NY do you consider him a bottom pairing guy bc he struggled in a new system?

Being utilized is different than being useful or effective. He was a good player playing on a bottom feeding team. Do you think this applies to Zaitsev?
30 oct. 2020 à 23 h 10
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Just wondering why you consider him a bottom pairing Dman. He’s struggled in Washington but idk if I would consider him or label him as strictly a bottom pairing guy. Seems a little harsh/ premature. He looked really solid last part of the year for Washington. Shatty got BO of NY do you consider him a bottom pairing guy bc he struggled in a new system?

Being utilized is different than being useful or effective. He was a good player playing on a bottom feeding team. Do you think this applies to Zaitsev?

He’s a bottom pairing defensemen on a contending team In my eyes until he has a decent sample size to show otherwise. Just because a team utilizes a player on a specific pairing doesn’t make them that (eg Zaitsev first pairing, Sergachev third pairing). Just because I see Jensen as a solid #5 doesn’t mean he’s not useful or effective you need guys like that. Could he become a second pairing guy? Potentially but it’s no guarantee. My statement is we already have a surplus of quality guys above him so why trade for him? It has nothing to do with system as you can see Shatty had a resume pre & post Rags which you really can’t say about Jensen outside of one year.
Pond_Duck a aimé ceci.
6 nov. 2020 à 8 h 53
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 264
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Kempný is LTIR
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage