SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

An Unlikely Blockbuster

Créé par: Canadianape
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 28 oct. 2020
Publié: 28 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 200 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Dubé, Dillon
  2. Gaudreau, Johnny
  3. Monahan, Sean
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  6. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 635 833 $0 $925 000 $14 864 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 137 500 $4 137 500 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
875 000 $875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 oct. 2020 à 19 h 57
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,823
Mentions "j'aime": 23,909
Philly wins this by far
28 oct. 2020 à 20 h 1
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 604
Mentions "j'aime": 119
Quoting: csick
Philly wins this by far


not too sure about that. Konecny might end up being better than gaudreau in the long run. Joel Farabee has a ton of potential. definetly more than dube and Giroux is a better 1C than Monahan. you could adjust the picks back to meet real value but i am one of the firm believers here in Calgary that gaudreau and Monahan will never be the top line that takes us to a Stanley cup
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2020 à 20 h 12
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
There is no chance in hell the Flames accept this
28 oct. 2020 à 20 h 24
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,291
Mentions "j'aime": 19,540
Quoting: Canadianape
not too sure about that. Konecny might end up being better than gaudreau in the long run. Joel Farabee has a ton of potential. definetly more than dube and Giroux is a better 1C than Monahan. you could adjust the picks back to meet real value but i am one of the firm believers here in Calgary that gaudreau and Monahan will never be the top line that takes us to a Stanley cup


Giroux hasn't played center in 3 years, he is not a better 1C. All he does is take right handed faceoffs. Konecney could be better than Gaudreau but not super likely. This trade is overall really bad for Calgary
SAS a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2020 à 20 h 56
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 604
Mentions "j'aime": 119
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Giroux hasn't played center in 3 years, he is not a better 1C. All he does is take right handed faceoffs. Konecney could be better than Gaudreau but not super likely. This trade is overall really bad for Calgary


disagree even if giroux hasnt played centre in 4 years hes still an upgrade over Monahan in every category except age and salary. but your part of the side that thinks sticking with the current core gets us anywhere when we have 4 straight seasons of failure to prove otherwise but i guess we will just keep losing.
28 oct. 2020 à 21 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,631
Mentions "j'aime": 5,765
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Giroux hasn't played center in 3 years, he is not a better 1C. All he does is take right handed faceoffs. Konecney could be better than Gaudreau but not super likely. This trade is overall really bad for Calgary


Konecny had a better year this past season than Gaudreau. He's 5 years younger and on a cheaper deal for long term. I'd rather have Konecny than Gaudreau but we can say they're even.
Giroux is an all around better player than monahan but monahan is 6 years younger and cheaper. I'd rather have monahan at this point in their careers but again I think they're pretty even in value.
Prospects are mostly opinion but I'd say farabee is a better prospect than dube. But not a 1st 2nd and 3rd better. I think it's a fair deal if you take out the 2nd and 3rd.
With all that said I think Philly declines. I think they're invested in the team they have and any moves they make will be minor
Canadianape a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2020 à 21 h 5
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,291
Mentions "j'aime": 19,540
Quoting: Canadianape
disagree even if giroux hasnt played centre in 4 years hes still an upgrade over Monahan in every category except age and salary. but your part of the side that thinks sticking with the current core gets us anywhere when we have 4 straight seasons of failure to prove otherwise but i guess we will just keep losing.


4 straight seasons of failure? 25 other teams have 4 straight seasons of failure, would be 26 but Vegas joined 3 years ago. What a horrible argument.
SAS et flamesfan a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2020 à 21 h 21
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 604
Mentions "j'aime": 119
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
4 straight seasons of failure? 25 other teams have 4 straight seasons of failure, would be 26 but Vegas joined 3 years ago. What a horrible argument.


this might be the dumbest thing ive ever read. can you not comprehend the fantastical ideas of progression, learning from failure, improvement, coming together as a team, reaching the next goal line, They have ****ing won one playoff round or missed the playoffs for the last 10 seasons and you think they are not failing.

Not winning the stanley cup doesnt mean failure. doing the same thing year after year and losing the same way at the same time year after year and then not changing anything and expecting to somehow be better next season is the defineition of failure. even if the flames sold their entire team and did a rebuild it could be considered a step in the right direction and not a failure.

might aswell go all the way and say the flames have been failing for 31 seasons in a row

If you are gonna build a contender then take the risk and build the contender. if not, then rebuild and try again. this bull**** idea of oh we will just finish between 7th and 9th every season is brain dead. And dont even bring up the year they finsihed first because they managed to pull off one of the biggest collapses in history by nearly getting swept by colorado. SM and JG are not winners so if I have to lose a trade to get rid of them then I would do it all ****ing day

I'm really starting to believe that you cant think objectively about anything with these responses that you constantly come back with
28 oct. 2020 à 22 h 28
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 2,088
Mentions "j'aime": 686
Horrible for Calgary
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage