SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Toronto-SJ blockbuster

Créé par: TimothyJimothy
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 28 oct. 2020
Publié: 28 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Meier, Timo
  2. Merkley, Ryan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Marner, Mitchell
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 037 575 $0 $0 $6 462 425 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
874 125 $874 125 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 4
#1
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,207
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Sure why not.
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 4
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,233
Mentions "j'aime": 19,504
This would be the most moronic thing San Jose could possibly do
Borocop, FunMustBeAlways, Klara and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 5
#3
NoWah49
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,865
Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
Leafs take that
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 6
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,528
Mentions "j'aime": 491
leafs run with that, San Jose would never do this
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 6
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 31
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Before everyone loses their minds, remember, it's just a thought, not saying this is what they must do. Additional conditions could also be retaining 1.893 salary on Marner or trading Willy instead.

Once again, just a thought, not an idea I'm preaching to the Leafs mgmt team.
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 9
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,214
Mentions "j'aime": 2,866
Lol yeah in terms of value this is really really far off. Sharks never even consider doing this as it stands.
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 13
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,233
Mentions "j'aime": 19,504
Quoting: Caicos22
Before everyone loses their minds, remember, it's just a thought, not saying this is what they must do. Additional conditions could also be retaining 1.893 salary on Marner or trading Willy instead.

Once again, just a thought, not an idea I'm preaching to the Leafs mgmt team.


The issue isnt the cap hit. The issue is the difference between Meier and Marner isnt going to make San Jose any less of a lottery team. Both of those firsts are probably top 10 picks, maybe top 5
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 14
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
This is terrible for the sharks. Yes Marner is better than Meier but hes also much more expensive and fits our game less. Not worth downgrading our prospect and adding a ton of picks for
Jexus a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 16
#9
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
The issue isnt the cap hit. The issue is the difference between Meier and Marner isnt going to make San Jose any less of a lottery team. Both of those firsts are probably top 10 picks, maybe top 5


Agreed. Surely Doug Wilson has learned from his last bust-blockbuster about giving up 1st round picks when you've got some serious question marks on your team already.
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 16
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 197
Mentions "j'aime": 34
After giving Ottawa the third overall pick this year, I don't see SJ trading any more firsts for a long while.
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 18
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 31
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: papishark
This is terrible for the sharks. Yes Marner is better than Meier but hes also much more expensive and fits our game less. Not worth downgrading our prospect and adding a ton of picks for


Would one 1st,one 3rd and Sandin be better? Just curious.
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 19
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 31
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Hypothetically, say this trade would be possible; how would you edit the players/picks/prospects involved?
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 20
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Caicos22
Would one 1st,one 3rd and Sandin be better? Just curious.


Not really? The problem is the baseline really. Us moving Meier for Marner doesnt make sense unless its cheap. We already are a very top heavy team and taking on another massive contract wont be good for the overall team composition,
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 42
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Lol. Three 1st round picks..?? What?? And R.Merkley>Liljegren. And Marner isnt that much of an uograde over Meier to warrant three 1st round picks. And they will be early 1st round picks too..lol. This is crazy. And Marner makes 12M compared to Meier 4M..lol.
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 46
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Quoting: papishark
Not really? The problem is the baseline really. Us moving Meier for Marner doesnt make sense unless its cheap. We already are a very top heavy team and taking on another massive contract wont be good for the overall team composition,


Yep, that’s a good point. It’s why Crosby only took. 8.5M per year. So they could spend the extra 2.5-3.5M they should be spending on him on the team.

Leafs are spending 41M on 4 players..lol. And 4 forwards..lol. And have to pay the other 16-18 players the same. The other 40.5M b/ween 16-18 players. And the 4 players @ 41M per year, don’t even include a D-man or a goalie..lol
papishark a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2020 à 14 h 57
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 661
Mentions "j'aime": 124
lol - the Marner contract is a dog - his camp is absurd demanding that kind of coin. Most notably his father going on radio, but ultimately the buck stops with Dubeass. Dubeass is going with the barbell strategy of useless minimum contract 2005 all-stars and overpaying the top, while polluting the balance of the roster with mediocrity. Matthews is the only player on this team worth the money. Gallagher just signed a long term deal for less than Nylander, Anderson also.

Leafs need to move one of Tavares or Marner - no questions about that.
PGHBOB69 a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2020 à 15 h 55
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Modifié 28 oct. 2020 à 16 h 3
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
This would be the most moronic thing San Jose could possibly do


Quoting: NoWah49
Leafs take that


Quoting: PrimeDatsyuk
leafs run with that, San Jose would never do this


Quoting: papishark
This is terrible for the sharks. Yes Marner is better than Meier but hes also much more expensive and fits our game less. Not worth downgrading our prospect and adding a ton of picks for


Don't speak so fast. Liljegren and Merkley are arguably equal value prospects. Marner is worth substantial more than Meier and the picks don't balance it out enough. & remember that Toronto had Merkley on their "Do Not Draft" list. His attitude hasn't changed much so I doubt they jump to trade for him. They'll keep they'll roster as is and not think about this
28 oct. 2020 à 16 h 4
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: Steve_321
lol - the Marner contract is a dog - his camp is absurd demanding that kind of coin. Most notably his father going on radio, but ultimately the buck stops with Dubeass. Dubeass is going with the barbell strategy of useless minimum contract 2005 all-stars and overpaying the top, while polluting the balance of the roster with mediocrity. Matthews is the only player on this team worth the money. Gallagher just signed a long term deal for less than Nylander, Anderson also.

Leafs need to move one of Tavares or Marner - no questions about that.


Lol, the arrogance of this comment. As if you wouldn't have asked for as much money as you coulda got too. The contract'a signed. Deal with it and get over it. Lmao.
28 oct. 2020 à 16 h 22
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 31
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Don't speak so fast. Liljegren and Merkley are arguably equal value prospects. Marner is worth substantial more than Meier and the picks don't balance it out enough. & remember that Toronto had Merkley on their "Do Not Draft" list. His attitude hasn't changed much so I doubt they jump to trade for him. They'll keep they'll roster as is and not think about this


Didn't know about TOR's "DND" list for Merkley, thanks for the tip. I agree, roster most likely stays as is.
28 oct. 2020 à 16 h 31
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,450
Mentions "j'aime": 576
Sharks heartily decline. No way in hell
papishark a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2020 à 16 h 36
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Don't speak so fast. Liljegren and Merkley are arguably equal value prospects. Marner is worth substantial more than Meier and the picks don't balance it out enough. & remember that Toronto had Merkley on their "Do Not Draft" list. His attitude hasn't changed much so I doubt they jump to trade for him. They'll keep they'll roster as is and not think about this


Thats great but I think the sharks would value Merkley higher than Lilegren. They have a lot invested in success
28 oct. 2020 à 16 h 37
#22
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: papishark
Thats great but I think the sharks would value Merkley higher than Lilegren. They have a lot invested in success


Lol. If that's the case then they should have higher value in Liljegren. Merkley may be slightly better offensively, but Liljegren is miles better defensively
28 oct. 2020 à 16 h 44
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,233
Mentions "j'aime": 19,504
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Don't speak so fast. Liljegren and Merkley are arguably equal value prospects. Marner is worth substantial more than Meier and the picks don't balance it out enough. & remember that Toronto had Merkley on their "Do Not Draft" list. His attitude hasn't changed much so I doubt they jump to trade for him. They'll keep they'll roster as is and not think about this


This is a horrible take, Meier is very very good and the difference between him and Marner is no where close to 2 likely top 10 picks. What the Sharks are trading away here coyld be comparable to ottawa trading Stutzle, Sanderson, Tkachuk, and Brannstrom. The first 3 on their own are arguably worth Marner. Sharks get completely bent over in this trade
28 oct. 2020 à 17 h 21
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Lol. If that's the case then they should have higher value in Liljegren. Merkley may be slightly better offensively, but Liljegren is miles better defensively


Merkley is literally unparalleled in his offensive talent. Lilegren is also a great Dman, but the sharks know what they have in Merkley and have worked with him for years now to improve his defensive woes and prepare him for a top NHL position.
28 oct. 2020 à 17 h 35
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Modifié 28 oct. 2020 à 17 h 41
Here is the true breakdown

Point
Marner >>> Meir
Goals
Marner << Meir
Potential
Marner >>>Meir
Salary
Marner <<<<<<<<< Meir

Marner is a more valuable player and he is a better player but his contract kills the value, thy would we give up our top prospect 2 1st and Meir for him? When we could keep the picks the prospect and Meir and also sign another high quality guy for 5.5-6 mil for the same cap hit as Meir. Now we have two all star quality top 6 forwards and picks and a good prospect Vs. Marner.
If we had a ton of cap space and a lot of strong top 6 players but no star I could see this working but as we stand now this would be a HARD NO!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage