SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Shaking it up without a trade

Créé par: NeverEndingMisery
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 26 oct. 2020
Publié: 26 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Absolutely can not go into next season with the same top 6 and a huge trade doesn't seem to be coming.
This leaves the only option to shake up the lines.
This gives them a legit top line and 2 very solid middle 6 lines
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $69 551 666 $0 $457 500 $11 948 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
875 000 $875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 oct. 2020 à 15 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Lindholm is not a center.

He himself says he is a winger, is better on the wing and is more comfortable on the wing.

Fellow Flames fans, get is through your thick ****ing skulls already, Lindholm is a RW
26 oct. 2020 à 15 h 28
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 146
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Modifié 26 oct. 2020 à 15 h 34
Quoting: Lunatik
Lindholm is not a center.

He himself says he is a winger, is better on the wing and is more comfortable on the wing.

Fellow Flames fans, get is through your thick ****ing skulls already, Lindholm is a RW



I'd like to see where he has ever stated that haha he's more than capable of playing centre and if it benefits the team you bet your a** they will try him there (just like they did last year)
26 oct. 2020 à 15 h 29
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 146
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Lunatik
Lindholm is not a center.

He himself says he is a winger, is better on the wing and is more comfortable on the wing.

Fellow Flames fans, get is through your thick ****ing skulls already, Lindholm is a RW


You're right tho, they should just keep rolling out the same lines as always and expect something to change
26 oct. 2020 à 17 h 21
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: NeverEndingMisery
I'd like to see where he has ever stated that haha he's more than capable of playing centre and if it benefits the team you bet your a** they will try him there (just like they did last year)

Yes, because going with 0 legitimate top 6 RW will benefit the team, right? And I'm sure you can find it, I'm not the only person who has referenced him saying it

Also, they tried him at C, when they tried Backlund at wing, that was an unmitigated failure.
26 oct. 2020 à 17 h 28
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 146
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Lunatik
Yes, because going with 0 legitimate top 6 RW will benefit the team, right? And I'm sure you can find it, I'm not the only person who has referenced him saying it

Also, they tried him at C, when they tried Backlund at wing, that was an unmitigated failure.


You are in fact the only person I have ever seen reference him saying this hahah
26 oct. 2020 à 17 h 32
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: NeverEndingMisery
You are in fact the only person I have ever seen reference him saying this hahah
I have seen others, I frankly don't care what you've seen. I've debated with you before, I'm not wasting any more time on you
26 oct. 2020 à 17 h 47
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 146
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Lunatik
I have seen others, I frankly don't care what you've seen. I've debated with you before, I'm not wasting any more time on you


Yeah I'd love if I never had to see your username pop up on a post of mine again LOL
26 oct. 2020 à 17 h 58
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 211
Mentions "j'aime": 35
If you really want to get wild, you could go:

Gaudreau-Backlund-Tkachuk
Mangiapane-Bennett-Lindholm
Dube-Monahan-Leivo
Lucic-Ryan-Simon

Really bust out that blender...
26 oct. 2020 à 17 h 59
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 146
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Modifié 26 oct. 2020 à 22 h 37
Quoting: Treize131
If you really want to get wild, you could go:

Gaudreau-Backlund-Tkachuk
Mangiapane-Bennett-Lindholm
Dube-Monahan-Leivo
Lucic-Ryan-Simon

Really bust out that blender...



I kinda like that! I just really think they should test out something new and I really want to see what an extended period of Gaudreau and Tkachuk together looks like
29 oct. 2020 à 18 h 3
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 146
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Lunatik
Lindholm is not a center.

He himself says he is a winger, is better on the wing and is more comfortable on the wing.

Fellow Flames fans, get is through your thick ****ing skulls already, Lindholm is a RW


Treliving quote today "Offseason plan was to give team flexibility to move Lindholm to centre if they decide to go that route"
29 oct. 2020 à 18 h 24
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: NeverEndingMisery
Treliving quote today "Offseason plan was to give team flexibility to move Lindholm to centre if they decide to go that route"

Are you really that daft? He's saying what people like you want to hear, no more no less. The only way Lindholm plays C is if there is injuries. Ward would have to be a **** sipping moron to move one of our 5 top 6 forwards to the 3rd line to promote a third liner to the first line.
29 oct. 2020 à 18 h 44
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 146
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Lunatik
Are you really that daft? He's saying what people like you want to hear, no more no less. The only way Lindholm plays C is if there is injuries. Ward would have to be a **** sipping moron to move one of our 5 top 6 forwards to the 3rd line to promote a third liner to the first line.


Well you'd have to assume it would be Backlund moving to the 3rd line in an attempt to even out the lines cause for the 1000000th time, rolling out the same lineup is NOT gonna magically ****ing work.
29 oct. 2020 à 19 h 17
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: NeverEndingMisery
Well you'd have to assume it would be Backlund moving to the 3rd line in an attempt to even out the lines cause for the 1000000th time, rolling out the same lineup is NOT gonna magically ****ing work.

The top line struggled last year but was one of the best in the league the season before. After Backlund moved back to center the 2nd line was exceptional last year. In the bottom 6 we have a ton of new faces and that doesn't even factor in potential development for Mangiapane or Dube. Things are far from as dire as drama queens like you make it out to be.
29 oct. 2020 à 19 h 20
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 146
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Lunatik
The top line struggled last year but was one of the best in the league the season before. After Backlund moved back to center the 2nd line was exceptional last year. In the bottom 6 we have a ton of new faces and that doesn't even factor in potential development for Mangiapane or Dube. Things are far from as dire as drama queens like you make it out to be.


How'd the playoffs go? (the only thing that really matters at this point)
29 oct. 2020 à 21 h 6
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: NeverEndingMisery
How'd the playoffs go? (the only thing that really matters at this point)

You mean against one of the best defensive teams in the NHL, that went to the finals, while arguably our best player hurt, rendering us a 1 line team? The playoffs where a couple late comebacks that having Tkachuk could have prevented and could have seen us win in 6? I remember them pretty well actually.
29 oct. 2020 à 21 h 37
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 146
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Lunatik
You mean against one of the best defensive teams in the NHL, that went to the finals, while arguably our best player hurt, rendering us a 1 line team? The playoffs where a couple late comebacks that having Tkachuk could have prevented and could have seen us win in 6? I remember them pretty well actually.


and whats the excuse for the colorado series? I love chuck but saying he wins us the series is not a certain and injuries happen, you cant look past the teams weaknesses because of an injured player (injuries are a massive factor into why they even won the play in round) . Heres a news flash for ya, if the flames want to succeed in the playoffs, they have to be able to beat defensive teams so explain to me how doing nothing changes anything?
29 oct. 2020 à 21 h 43
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: NeverEndingMisery
and whats the excuse for the colorado series? I love chuck but saying he wins us the series is not a certain and injuries happen, you cant look past the teams weaknesses because of an injured player (injuries are a massive factor into why they even won the play in round) . Heres a news flash for ya, if the flames want to succeed in the playoffs, they have to be able to beat defensive teams so explain to me how doing nothing changes anything?


Where did I say anything was a certainty? I used the term "could have" for a reason. And Colorado was a completely different set of problems, we backed into the playoffs, while Colorado was charging forward, we weren't able to flip a switch and reach their level.

If you actually think the Flames did nothing, you are even a bigger dimwit than I thought. The Flames made moves to reduce goals against, you do know not allowing a goal is just as good as scoring one, right?

But I'm done wasting my time on you.
29 oct. 2020 à 21 h 47
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 146
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Lunatik
Where did I say anything was a certainty? I used the term "could have" for a reason. And Colorado was a completely different set of problems, we backed into the playoffs, while Colorado was charging forward, we weren't able to flip a switch and reach their level.

If you actually think the Flames did nothing, you are even a bigger dimwit than I thought. The Flames made moves to reduce goals against, you do know not allowing a goal is just as good as scoring one, right?

But I'm done wasting my time on you.


Obviously, they made moves lol but none to address their biggest needs.... How can you be so dense and not see that??? Adding Markstrom is huge but moving around some bottom 6 pieces isn't gonna magically solve their issues up front.

And classic, run away when you're losing the debate hahahaha
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage