SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

CapCrunch

Créé par: Abroot
Équipe: 2020-21 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 7 oct. 2020
Publié: 25 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just an Idea tho it hurts trading them to division rivals and Im not 100% sure they would waive their NTC for these teams
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
13 500 000 $
14 000 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
1850 000 $
1800 000 $
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
TBL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Johnson, Tyler
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TBL)
2.
TBL
  1. Driedger, Chris
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de BUF
Logo de TBL
Logo de FLA
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NJD
2022
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
2023
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $80 800 000 $0 $0 $700 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 oct. 2020 à 12 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,227
Mentions "j'aime": 613
Panthers aren’t helping Tampa unless they give up something of value. Easy pass from them
25 oct. 2020 à 12 h 52
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 461
Mentions "j'aime": 218
Add a second and prospect maybe?
25 oct. 2020 à 12 h 52
#3
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,520
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
It'll cost a 1st from Buffalo.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2020 à 13 h 14
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 55
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
It'll cost a 1st from Buffalo.


If I'm Buffalo, rather than taking on 4x5M of Johnson's age 30 years, I'd offer Cirelli 4x4.3M and send the 2nd rd pick to TB if they don't match. In general if GM's with the cap space and picks for offer sheets the three RFA's from Tampa don't make the offer sheets they're idiots.
25 oct. 2020 à 13 h 23
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,526
Mentions "j'aime": 491
Johnson and Gourde don't waive, and the sweetener's would have to be bigger imo
25 oct. 2020 à 13 h 24
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 297
Mentions "j'aime": 35
I think both of those trades are more than fair.
25 oct. 2020 à 14 h 9
#7
BOLT LOVER
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,120
Mentions "j'aime": 358
I also think both are fair and realistic .. maybe a little less for Tampa but in ballpark.

And 100% TJ and Gourde take it .. when will fans here realize COVID and flat caps are making NTCs virtually worthless
25 oct. 2020 à 14 h 20
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 9,069
Mentions "j'aime": 2,197
You are about 2 million shy on each important RFA contract, even with the short term contract idea.
25 oct. 2020 à 14 h 29
#9
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,723
Mentions "j'aime": 2,958
Buffalo did not take Johnson’s contract when they could’ve had it for free. Why would they give up anything worthwhile to get him now?
Shootica et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2020 à 14 h 47
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 504
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Buffalo cannot afford Johnson's contract. This is a nonstarter unless we're sending money your way (which doesn't work for you) or you seriously, seriously make it worth our while.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2020 à 17 h 19
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 517
Mentions "j'aime": 214
Quoting: RamonDaze
If I'm Buffalo, rather than taking on 4x5M of Johnson's age 30 years, I'd offer Cirelli 4x4.3M and send the 2nd rd pick to TB if they don't match. In general if GM's with the cap space and picks for offer sheets the three RFA's from Tampa don't make the offer sheets they're idiots.


And what do you do when Cirelli says “lol no” to your offer and hangs up?
26 oct. 2020 à 12 h 0
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 55
Quoting: I_Know_Nothing_About_Hockey_Or_Any_Sport2
And what do you do when Cirelli says “lol no” to your offer and hangs up?


This post above has him at 1x3.5M, so 4x4.3M is better than that, no? In real life, typically it's the agents talking and they don't just hang up. This laugh & hang-up thing is a misnomer where people act like contract negotiations work like sports take radio.

Cirelli is an RFA, not a UFA. A 3-4 year deal for him is ideal because it provides some security and still allows him to reach UFA at a young enough age to cash in hopefully when the cap is starting to go up again. I don't think that his value in flat cap is in the 6M range, so 4.3 isn't so low.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage