SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Nate Schmidt Where was Sweeney

Créé par: Duggysdanglers
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 25 oct. 2020
Publié: 25 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not sure why they signed McKegg. Sweeney could have hit one outta the park had he been awake enough to know that Schmidt was available. That would have helped to make up for losing Krug in Free Agency. Pretty sure NS is better at 5v5 too. McAvoy can takeover as PP QB. Grizz can do that role on PP2.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Schmidt, Nate
55 950 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
2.
BOS
    Nothing. Cap Dump.
    NJD
    1. Moore, John
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
    3.
    BOS
      Nate Schmidt. I’m just going to pretend that Don Sweeney was awake when this trade was made.
      VGK
      1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2021
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de TOR
      2022
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de LAK
      2023
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2381 500 000 $80 743 389 $964 222 $2 000 000 $756 611 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
      AG
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
      C
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
      AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      C, AD
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      850 000 $850 000 $
      AG, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      700 000 $700 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Schmidt, Nate
      5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
      DG
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
      G
      UFA - 1
      900 000 $900 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      850 000 $850 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
      DD
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      25 oct. 2020 à 1 h 26
      #1
      BleedinBlue since‘96
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 119
      Mentions "j'aime": 27
      Crazy that Vancouver got a top pairing defenseman at $5M for a 3rd round pick...
      Radu47 et Duggysdanglers a aimé ceci.
      25 oct. 2020 à 1 h 26
      #2
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 3,601
      Mentions "j'aime": 609
      Quoting: BroadwayBlueshirtz
      Crazy that Vancouver got a top pairing defenseman at $5M for a 3rd round pick...


      I know. Sweeney had to have been on vacation.
      25 oct. 2020 à 1 h 30
      #3
      Vegan Commie Hipster
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 7,888
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
      SKATR has Krug ~20 percentiles ahead of Schmidt by 5v5 impact but they have inversely tough context: Krug cushioned / NS *opposite of cushioned*

      So probably Krug is a tier better all told but not eons

      Studies so far suggesting context mostly washes out
      25 oct. 2020 à 1 h 35
      #4
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 3,601
      Mentions "j'aime": 609
      Quoting: Radu47
      SKATR has Krug ~20 percentiles ahead of Schmidt by 5v5 impact but they have inversely tough context: Krug cushioned / NS *opposite of cushioned*

      So probably Krug is a tier better all told but not eons

      Studies so far suggesting context mostly washes out


      I’m sure that Nate would have had a better time defending Maroon in front of the net in OT of Game 5.
      25 oct. 2020 à 1 h 51
      #5
      BleedinBlue since‘96
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 119
      Mentions "j'aime": 27
      Quoting: Duggysdanglers
      I know. Sweeney had to have been on vacation.


      He likes to play a very minor ball game. Craig Smith and Ondrej Kase we’re quiet moves. He’s gotta step out his bubble and make a splash. Especially after losing Krug.
      Duggysdanglers a aimé ceci.
      25 oct. 2020 à 2 h 1
      #6
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 3,601
      Mentions "j'aime": 609
      Quoting: BroadwayBlueshirtz
      He likes to play a very minor ball game. Craig Smith and Ondrej Kase we’re quiet moves. He’s gotta step out his bubble and make a splash. Especially after losing Krug.


      I’m sure the Bs will stay quiet. They are still gun shy after the Rick Nash trade fiasco.
      25 oct. 2020 à 2 h 11
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2020
      Messages: 2,686
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
      Quoting: BroadwayBlueshirtz
      Crazy that Vancouver got a top pairing defenseman at $5M for a 3rd round pick...


      Basically 6Mil actually but yea.
      BroadwayBlueshirtz a aimé ceci.
      25 oct. 2020 à 8 h 36
      #8
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 1,067
      Mentions "j'aime": 427
      It was interesting... I think the contract probably scared him and other teams away. I’m also of some belief that they want some of their internal guys to play (Zboril, Vaak, etc.) and if they need help they’ll get it during the year. It’s tough timing to coincide with where the core is, and I’m not saying I agree with him standing still with it but that might be where his head was at.
      Duggysdanglers et KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
      25 oct. 2020 à 8 h 54
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2016
      Messages: 12,573
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
      Quoting: BroadwayBlueshirtz
      He likes to play a very minor ball game. Craig Smith and Ondrej Kase we’re quiet moves. He’s gotta step out his bubble and make a splash. Especially after losing Krug.


      Quiet moves but that could bring a lot

      No real top6 RWs other than Pastrnak in the past 4 years hurt+ 5on5 scoring issues
      Kase: 93% of his goals (past 3Y) have been at even strength+plays RW (and got him while dumping Backes' contract)
      Smith 73% of his goals (past 3Y) have been at even strength+plays RW (6x 20 G/82 GP)

      That's what the Bruins need. Not a big move like signing a free agent (Beleskey/Backes) and overpaying them. Just need a top4 LHD now.
      Duggysdanglers et KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
      25 oct. 2020 à 9 h 37
      #10
      BleedinBlue since‘96
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 119
      Mentions "j'aime": 27
      Quoting: bhavikp27
      Quiet moves but that could bring a lot

      No real top6 RWs other than Pastrnak in the past 4 years hurt+ 5on5 scoring issues
      Kase: 93% of his goals (past 3Y) have been at even strength+plays RW (and got him while dumping Backes' contract)
      Smith 73% of his goals (past 3Y) have been at even strength+plays RW (6x 20 G/82 GP)

      That's what the Bruins need. Not a big move like signing a free agent (Beleskey/Backes) and overpaying them. Just need a top4 LHD now.


      Bruins aren’t winning a Stanley Cup if he keeps walking around eggshells to not trade major assets for major returns. I guarantee you that. He’s slowly letting this core die, and slowly getting ready for a Hawks-Esque Fire Sale.
      25 oct. 2020 à 10 h 27
      #11
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 3,601
      Mentions "j'aime": 609
      Quoting: Heyhowareya37
      It was interesting... I think the contract probably scared him and other teams away. I’m also of some belief that they want some of their internal guys to play (Zboril, Vaak, etc.) and if they need help they’ll get it during the year. It’s tough timing to coincide with where the core is, and I’m not saying I agree with him standing still with it but that might be where his head was at.


      If you have a chance to grab a top 4 LD for a third round pick then you grab him. Work out the playing time later.
      25 oct. 2020 à 11 h 14
      #12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 1,067
      Mentions "j'aime": 427
      Quoting: Duggysdanglers
      If you have a chance to grab a top 4 LD for a third round pick then you grab him. Work out the playing time later.


      Sure, I’m not disagreeing with you. His cap limits their flexibility but they’re in a win now mode I get it. It’ll be interesting to see how it plays out I guess.
      25 oct. 2020 à 13 h 29
      #13
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 1,170
      Mentions "j'aime": 286
      Kings decline, they have to save room for contracts.
      25 oct. 2020 à 14 h 35
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2019
      Messages: 1,724
      Mentions "j'aime": 535
      Another problem you gotta think about is the expansion draft. Maybe Sweens was afraid of exposing gryz and thats y they didnt go after him. Cap restraints was probably another issue. Maybe no one wants moore. We don't know whats happening in closed doors. I would give sweens the benefit of the doubt.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage