SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Johnson in Eriksson out

Créé par: KPasty
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 24 oct. 2020
Publié: 24 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Johnson, Tyler (1 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TBL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 643 545 $1 700 000 $4 750 000 $4 856 455 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 oct. 2020 à 14 h 30
#1
Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 3,548
Mentions "j'aime": 1,582
Ottawa declines. They're pretty loaded up with prospects and the TBL pick is for sure in the mid 20s or later.
If VAN is not taking Zaitsev back in the deal, or upping it to the TBL + VAN 2021 1st round picks, Ottawa isn't touching him.
24 oct. 2020 à 14 h 56
#2
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 541
The Van pick top 3 protected and even lose the 2nd add a 4th instead. Johnson isn't Eriksson lol, so they will have to trade something for him.

Quoting: TCMonkey
Ottawa declines. They're pretty loaded up with prospects and the TBL pick is for sure in the mid 20s or later.
If VAN is not taking Zaitsev back in the deal, or upping it to the TBL + VAN 2021 1st round picks, Ottawa isn't touching him.


I disagree, it's worth touching. Especially considering Eriksson is only owed 1m this year and 4 next. Sure they're loaded but another asset is another weapon to leverage. You don't refuse because you have too many assets
24 oct. 2020 à 15 h 6
#3
Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 3,548
Mentions "j'aime": 1,582
Quoting: CMac66
The Van pick top 3 protected and even lose the 2nd add a 4th instead. Johnson isn't Eriksson lol, so they will have to trade something for him.



I disagree, it's worth touching. Especially considering Eriksson is only owed 1m this year and 4 next. Sure they're loaded but another asset is another weapon to leverage. You don't refuse because you have too many assets


I did suggest it would need to be the TBL 1st + the VAN 1st, so I'm not against taking back picks... I just want it to be fair value and since NO ONE ELSE is going to touch Eriksson, VAN can either keep him or pay what is being asked. For me, a late 1st and late 2nd is not enough. But I truly feel the deal should involve Zaitsev.
CMac66 a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2020 à 17 h 13
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,173
Mentions "j'aime": 697
Quoting: TCMonkey
I did suggest it would need to be the TBL 1st + the VAN 1st, so I'm not against taking back picks... I just want it to be fair value and since NO ONE ELSE is going to touch Eriksson, VAN can either keep him or pay what is being asked. For me, a late 1st and late 2nd is not enough. But I truly feel the deal should involve Zaitsev.


Zaitsev's contract is even worse than Eriksson's. Loui has two more years with only $5 million of real money owed. He can play a legit 3rd line winger and kill penalties quite well. He's still servicable, but at $6 million AAV it's a ridiculous cap hit. NZ has four more years at $18 million of real money. He's a 3rd pairing D-man at best...AT BEST! In this case, I would say that given Ottawa's lousy financial situation, they may need to take Loui and include one of their prospects in order for Vancouver to take on this boat anchor of a deal.
KPasty et OlegP a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2020 à 17 h 37
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,323
Mentions "j'aime": 1,372
Quoting: CMac66
The Van pick top 3 protected and even lose the 2nd add a 4th instead. Johnson isn't Eriksson lol, so they will have to trade something for him.



I disagree, it's worth touching. Especially considering Eriksson is only owed 1m this year and 4 next. Sure they're loaded but another asset is another weapon to leverage. You don't refuse because you have too many assets


Tj was put on waivers and NO ONE TOOK him, for free, TBL will have to PAY to move him.
24 oct. 2020 à 17 h 45
#6
Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 3,548
Mentions "j'aime": 1,582
Quoting: Jim_Benning_Almost
Zaitsev's contract is even worse than Eriksson's. Loui has two more years with only $5 million of real money owed. He can play a legit 3rd line winger and kill penalties quite well. He's still servicable, but at $6 million AAV it's a ridiculous cap hit. NZ has four more years at $18 million of real money. He's a 3rd pairing D-man at best...AT BEST! In this case, I would say that given Ottawa's lousy financial situation, they may need to take Loui and include one of their prospects in order for Vancouver to take on this boat anchor of a deal.


Cool by me. You guys can keep him. Ottawa isn't touching that offer though.
25 oct. 2020 à 8 h 34
#7
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Quoting: athrin
Tj was put on waivers and NO ONE TOOK him, for free, TBL will have to PAY to move him.


Sure but not a 1st lol
25 oct. 2020 à 8 h 42
#8
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Quoting: TCMonkey
I did suggest it would need to be the TBL 1st + the VAN 1st, so I'm not against taking back picks... I just want it to be fair value and since NO ONE ELSE is going to touch Eriksson, VAN can either keep him or pay what is being asked. For me, a late 1st and late 2nd is not enough. But I truly feel the deal should involve Zaitsev.


But if it involves Zaitsev, the Canucks don't really have any motivation to do that. Saving 1.5 mil off the cap isn't enough for them and definitely not enough to warrant any sweetener that would be worth the trade
25 oct. 2020 à 14 h 52
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
The Canucks will never give up another 1st round pick as they did in 2019 off season. Been there, done that. They couldn't pick til the 3rd round this season. JT Miller worked out but it was still a huge mistake to overpay when Tampa was in a corner ly.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage