SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who says no

Équipe: 2020-21 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 24 oct. 2020
Publié: 24 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
34 250 000 $
1800 000 $
24 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Killorn, Alex
  2. Stamkos, Steven
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
2.
TBL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Johnson, Tyler
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TBL)
3.
TBL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NJD
2022
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
2023
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $81 338 424 $0 $500 000 $161 576 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
759 258 $759 258 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
737 500 $737 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 oct. 2020 à 10 h 40
#1
DaBus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,404
Mentions "j'aime": 489
Tampa should decline the TOR and NYR trades. Just trade Killorn and keep Stamkos because you save like 3.5M that way. You could get more for Sergachev. A 1st rounder and a prospect at least
Breadmanhawks a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2020 à 10 h 41
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,638
Mentions "j'aime": 14,424
Quoting: DaBus
Tampa should decline the TOR and NYR trades. Just trade Killorn and keep Stamkos because you save like 3.5M that way. You could get more for Sergachev. A 1st rounder and a prospect at least


I dont think you can get more for sergachev with the flat cap and AFTER ufa and in their desperation to move money
24 oct. 2020 à 10 h 46
#3
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,627
Mentions "j'aime": 12,353
I think Tavares and Stamkos say no, one had Leafs pjs, the other didn't.
24 oct. 2020 à 10 h 47
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,039
Mentions "j'aime": 369
Tampa laughs in Toronto’s face. If they were both at the same cap hit Tampa would still laugh at this deal let alone adding assets.
24 oct. 2020 à 10 h 47
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Even if you want to say Stammer is better, which I might be ok with (though I think its close), and that he makes less money, he is far more injury prone, so for that reason, I'm out.
24 oct. 2020 à 10 h 47
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
First trade Tavares and Stamkos, Second trade Johnson and Third trade Tampa.
Eli a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2020 à 10 h 51
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
No freaking way Tampa does Tavares for Stakos and Killorn defeats the purpose of moving both to begin with. If Brisebois could move Stamkos, Killorn and Johnson then there's no reason to deal Sergachev.
24 oct. 2020 à 10 h 51
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,214
Mentions "j'aime": 5,077
I like the outside the box thinking with the TOR trade, but I dont think JT wants to leave.

Also, this does nothing to address any needs for Toronto, as it just adds more to our payroll and doesnt improve the Defence. Leafs would be interested in cernak...
24 oct. 2020 à 10 h 55
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,638
Mentions "j'aime": 14,424
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
No freaking way Tampa does Tavares for Stakos and Killorn defeats the purpose of moving both to begin with. If Brisebois could move Stamkos, Killorn and Johnson then there's no reason to deal Sergachev.


Yes, he can move Stamkos and killorn because they agree to waive there and he can't just get rid of 13 million without taking anything back. Tavares keeps the team elite.

The scenario and money have to work for all teams, you can't just say oh, well let's move these guys and keep sergachev
24 oct. 2020 à 11 h 3
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Yes, he can move Stamkos and killorn because they agree to waive there and he can't just get rid of 13 million without taking anything back. Tavares keeps the team elite.

The scenario and money have to work for all teams, you can't just say oh, well let's move these guys and keep sergachev


Doesn't matter because Tavares isn't leaving Toronto and Stamkos isn't leaving Tampa. And fat chance of Johnson waiving for Ottawa yeah i know the Sens will be an up and coming team in 3-4 years but they're not there yet. And i doubt the Rangers can afford Sergachev they will need to move out both Strome and TDA need to remember they've $3.95M in bonuses to pay out as well.
24 oct. 2020 à 11 h 21
#11
BleedinBlue since‘96
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 119
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Rangers certainly accept that deal.
24 oct. 2020 à 11 h 21
#12
BleedinBlue since‘96
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 119
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Tavares is going to fall off next year. Hard. Stamkos was always better anyways. Cheaper too. Toronto should be adding. Significantly.
24 oct. 2020 à 11 h 23
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: BroadwayBlueshirtz
Rangers certainly accept that deal.


Tampa doesn't, Sergachev is worth more then a late teens early twenty's 1st round pick.
24 oct. 2020 à 11 h 24
#14
BleedinBlue since‘96
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 119
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Tampa doesn't, Sergachev is worth more then a late teens early twenty 1st round pick.


I don’t think we’ll be as good as that. Rangers could offer much more but Tampa lacks leverage.
24 oct. 2020 à 11 h 28
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: BroadwayBlueshirtz
I don’t think we’ll be as good as that. Rangers could offer much more but Tampa lacks leverage.


They lack leverage as far as Johnson, Killorn, Gourde and Palat are concerned. But not Cirelli or Sergachev.
24 oct. 2020 à 11 h 44
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,638
Mentions "j'aime": 14,424
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Doesn't matter because Tavares isn't leaving Toronto and Stamkos isn't leaving Tampa. And fat chance of Johnson waiving for Ottawa yeah i know the Sens will be an up and coming team in 3-4 years but they're not there yet. And i doubt the Rangers can afford Sergachev they will need to move out both Strome and TDA need to remember they've $3.95M in bonuses to pay out as well.


You are the ruiner of fun.
24 oct. 2020 à 11 h 51
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
You are the ruiner of fun.


Maybe because i'm a realist, Honesty tell me how it benefits Tampa by gaining Tavares while losing Stamkos, Killorn, Johnson and Sergachev?l
24 oct. 2020 à 11 h 52
#18
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
They lack leverage as far as Johnson, Killorn, Gourde and Palat are concerned. But not Cirelli or Sergachev.


Thats the whole point is they dont have leverage with players that are logjamming the cap because they have no trade clauses. Its not like these guys are kicking down managements door to waive them.

For example, why would TJ waive to go to Ottawa? Hell, they waived the guy and not a single team cared. No one feels bad for Tampa.
DiehardRedWingsFan58 a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2020 à 12 h 0
#19
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Doesn't matter because Tavares isn't leaving Toronto and Stamkos isn't leaving Tampa. And fat chance of Johnson waiving for Ottawa yeah i know the Sens will be an up and coming team in 3-4 years but they're not there yet. And i doubt the Rangers can afford Sergachev they will need to move out both Strome and TDA need to remember they've $3.95M in bonuses to pay out as well.


Its not IMpossible, but theyd have to find a suitor for Smith without retaining any $ and a equal to or below 4.5m contract for Strome. The secondary problem here is it adds another player for the Rangers to protect.
24 oct. 2020 à 12 h 1
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: aecliptic
Thats the whole point is they dont have leverage with players that are logjamming the cap because they have no trade clauses. Its not like these guys are kicking down managements door to waive them.

For example, why would TJ waive to go to Ottawa? Hell, they waived the guy and not a single team cared. No one feels bad for Tampa.


Yup no matter how you look at it Tampa is screwed, Like to see Brisebois wiggle his way out of this. Without possibly losing 2 of Cernak, Cirelli or Sergachev.
24 oct. 2020 à 13 h 14
#21
tomato
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 305
Value wise the leafs do that trade every day of the week. Factoring in the cap i still think we do it. Factoring in the fact that JT wouldn't accept a trade out of Toronto it would never get done. Tampa would be dumb to offer the trade. Taking Tavares back at a higher salary than Stamkos while providing about equal value means they areonly really saving a couple million on the cap while also throwing in a second round pick. If they think internally that his injury problems are going to be a constant thing every year maybe they entertain trading him in this type of deal but no way JT will want to leave. I think if you put Sergachev on the market, even with teams knowing Tamps is cap crunched and has less leverage in trades they could get a lot more for him than that. Perfect age talent level and the fact that he can play either side makes him an extremely valuable asset. With Mcdonaugh and Hedman entering there early 30s, they should look to lock up both of Sergachev and Cernak to long deals.
24 oct. 2020 à 13 h 49
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,248
Mentions "j'aime": 2,526
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Tampa doesn't, Sergachev is worth more then a late teens early twenty's 1st round pick.


We draft top 3 with a rigged lottery system 😂😂 not teens/twenties.
24 oct. 2020 à 13 h 52
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: NYR1983
We draft top 3 with a rigged lottery system 😂😂 not teens/twenties.


Yeah tell me about it, Pretty pathetic when a 79 point Ranger team winds up with Lafreniere making Gary Bettman the laughing stock of the NHL.
24 oct. 2020 à 14 h 35
#24
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,638
Mentions "j'aime": 14,424
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Maybe because i'm a realist, Honesty tell me how it benefits Tampa by gaining Tavares while losing Stamkos, Killorn, Johnson and Sergachev?l


They are gonna lose a bunch of those guys no matter what, for nothing. I brought back tavarez and a first.just trying to have some fun
DiehardRedWingsFan58 a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2020 à 14 h 40
#25
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
They are gonna lose a bunch of those guys no matter what, for nothing. I brought back tavarez and a first.just trying to have some fun


That's true between what Tampa is going to have to surrender just to keep Cernak, Cirelli and Sergachev plus next years expansion draft. Tampa will definitely be a different team good thing they won the cup this year. Their window could be closing sooner rather then later.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage