SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kane to VAN and Burns to PHI in Fair Deals and Offer Sheeting Cirelli

Créé par: CheechYou
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 24 oct. 2020
Publié: 24 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Protections:

F: couture meier labanc hertl cirelli donato kellman (though I think he's not elligble)
D: vlasic karlsson simek
G: dubnyk

Either 2yrs of Ghost, 3yrs of Jones, or 1yr Eriksson selected. Pick your poison SEA.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
56 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
1925 000 $
11 000 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Cirelli, Anthony6 000 000 $
Choix de 1e ronde en 2021
Choix de 3e ronde en 2021
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
2.
SJS
  1. Gostisbehere, Shayne
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $76 659 167 $0 $345 000 $4 840 833 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 oct. 2020 à 5 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,098
Mentions "j'aime": 1,688
If their deals were shorter I could see this but the term is the killer
24 oct. 2020 à 5 h 24
#2
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
2 years of Ghost =/= poison, at worst it's meh

He drives play. He scores well. He's only 27.

Regressing from brilliant to good =/= useless
ALitteral a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2020 à 6 h 45
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 268
Mentions "j'aime": 100
As a Flyers fan. Lol no. I'll gladly let them bench Ghost for 3 more seasons than take back Burns contract for 5 more.
Claesson4Norris et remowilliams a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2020 à 8 h 15
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,635
Mentions "j'aime": 1,167
Quoting: Gunmars
As a Flyers fan. Lol no. I'll gladly let them bench Ghost for 3 more seasons than take back Burns contract for 5 more.


the canucks would decline for the same reason.
24 oct. 2020 à 8 h 22
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 596
Mentions "j'aime": 328
Quoting: Radu47
2 years of Ghost =/= poison, at worst it's meh

He drives play. He scores well. He's only 27.

Regressing from brilliant to good =/= useless


This is logic that is largely unseen in this place. I’ve been saying that anyone who saw him skate after the knee clean out over the pause saw the explosiveness Ghost needs to be successful
24 oct. 2020 à 10 h 8
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,173
Mentions "j'aime": 697
Vancouver appreciates San Jose's willingness to take on our lousy Loui Eriksson contract, however we feel that Kane is on a downward trajectory in his career and at $7 million per year for 5 more years, isn't worth that gamble, especially if it costs us a first rounder. We may look at it if SJ agreed to retain money and take a 2nd rounder instead.

As well, we would need a written commitment from Kane to stay out of the Roxy when he lives here in Vancouver!!
24 oct. 2020 à 12 h 4
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Quoting: Gunmars
As a Flyers fan. Lol no. I'll gladly let them bench Ghost for 3 more seasons than take back Burns contract for 5 more.


I worries. I’d shoot myself for accepting ghost’s ugly contract for Burns because the last 2 years Might not be good. Burns will be a top 4 D man even at 40 much like rob Blake was
24 oct. 2020 à 12 h 7
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Quoting: Jim_Benning_Almost
Vancouver appreciates San Jose's willingness to take on our lousy Loui Eriksson contract, however we feel that Kane is on a downward trajectory in his career and at $7 million per year for 5 more years, isn't worth that gamble, especially if it costs us a first rounder. We may look at it if SJ agreed to retain money and take a 2nd rounder instead.

As well, we would need a written commitment from Kane to stay out of the Roxy when he lives here in Vancouver!!


Where is this reasoning for a downward trajectory? He’s been very consistent the last 4 years and fairly healthy! Plus he is still under 30 and his contract expires at age 33 not 37. We don’t want to trade him he’s one our most valuable players.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage