SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lose Myers in Expansion

Créé par: canuck_in_the_6ix
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 22 oct. 2020
Publié: 22 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Minimal changes to the team, lots of internal promotion of high-promise prospects that will hopefully get experience and prove themselves in 2020-2021. Losing Myers in expansion should help with re-signing Petey and Hughes to long term. Cernak miiiiiiight be attainable if we make use of LTIR and bury some contracts + papering players down without waviers to start off 2020-2021, or he can be a placeholder for some young, defensively responsible RD that a team may no longer have room to pay or slots to protect in the upcoming expansion.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
88 000 000 $
89 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
23 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
44 000 000 $
1970 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Cernak, Erik4 000 000 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2021
Transactions
VAN
VGK
  1. Myers, Tyler
Détails additionnels:
Seattle Expansion Pick
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $78 431 492 $648 780 $1 200 000 $3 068 508 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
970 000 $970 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
860 833 $860 833 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 oct. 2020 à 21 h 45
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,068
Mentions "j'aime": 22,464
Seems like every "homer" expects Seattle to take a bad contract from their team. Not happening.
22 oct. 2020 à 21 h 54
#2
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Be prepared to throw in picks/prospects for that to happen
22 oct. 2020 à 22 h 9
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 361
Mentions "j'aime": 179
Seattle must be real nice to take myers off your hands for free
22 oct. 2020 à 22 h 30
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 309
Mentions "j'aime": 60
ya theyd probably take holtby before myers
or Lind
or MacEwen
or Leivo/whatever winger UFA if we sign him
or Cernak/whatever FA RD we sign
or Motte if we leave him exposed
or Pearson if we extend and leave him exposed
22 oct. 2020 à 23 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 190
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Even with GMJB in charge, none of those Mid-low tier RFAs are getting 2-3mil cap hit deals. Seriously, why are Juolevi and Rafferty getting 2mil when neither has played more than 10mins at the NHL level yet, and in a flat cap? You must be expecting Gaudette to have a breakout year in 2021 to be getting a 3mil contract.

Wtf is Roussel on the 2nd line? 🤦🏻‍♂️
23 oct. 2020 à 23 h 14
#6
Démarrer sujet
canuck_in_the_6ix
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 21
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: major_hassle
ya theyd probably take holtby before myers
or Lind
or MacEwen
or Leivo/whatever winger UFA if we sign him
or Cernak/whatever FA RD we sign
or Motte if we leave him exposed
or Pearson if we extend and leave him exposed


Depends if they think Myers is a legit top 4 D or not. Lind/MacEwen/Motte are horrible pickups for expansion, Leivo/whatever UFA winger isn't going to get anymore than a 1x1 deal (and thus not eligible for expansion), and Cernak/Pearson/whatever RD will be protected if we get them. The best Seattle is going to get from us is Holtby (aging goalie, 1 year contract may be seen as a positive or a negative depending on his play this year), Myers ("big minutes top 4 D" for 3 years would be seen as some GMs as a good thing, overblown as his rep may be among the analytics community), or one of our 4th liners/B- prospects.
23 oct. 2020 à 23 h 20
#7
Démarrer sujet
canuck_in_the_6ix
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 21
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: SDR
Even with GMJB in charge, none of those Mid-low tier RFAs are getting 2-3mil cap hit deals. Seriously, why are Juolevi and Rafferty getting 2mil when neither has played more than 10mins at the NHL level yet, and in a flat cap? You must be expecting Gaudette to have a breakout year in 2021 to be getting a 3mil contract.

Wtf is Roussel on the 2nd line? 🤦🏻‍♂️


This is for 2021-2022, so presumably they will have played NHL minutes, and ideally done well enough in them to warrant 2x2. Honestly the bigger assumption here is that both Juolevi and Rathbone will be able to step up and replace 2/3LD. If they don't do well enough, great, we save some money and can use some of the space to pay off performance bonuses that Petey/Hughes will have undoubtedly earned, and perhaps Rathbone/Juolevi/Pod/Hog if we're lucky. Same applies to Gaudette - I'd rather be projecting overpayments than unrealistic underpayments.

Roussel on the 2nd line is a placeholder for Hog's development, Roussel did pretty well with Bo two years ago before he got injured. I'd really rather not sign an overpriced UFA (and we don't really have the room for it) for probably too much term and end up blocking Hog's prime minutes in the roster. I suppose another option is somehow getting a young, good value LW for longer term to replace Miller the year after, but the cap navigation gets trickier and it's not like young AND good players are easy to come by.
23 oct. 2020 à 23 h 28
#8
Démarrer sujet
canuck_in_the_6ix
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 21
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: palhal
Seems like every "homer" expects Seattle to take a bad contract from their team. Not happening.


They're either getting a bad contract or a replacement level player. They can either have Eriksson, Roussel, Beagle, Motte, MacEwen, Myers, a clearly declining Holtby, or a completely unproven prospect who hasn't been good enough to deserve protection and has taken so long to develop that they're not exempt from the expansion draft. And if any one of those 5 forwards is decent we can still protect them. This does rely on Benning not signing some Dman as expansion exposure fodder in order to protect Myers though, which would be kinda classic Benning.
24 oct. 2020 à 22 h 48
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,068
Mentions "j'aime": 22,464
Quoting: canuck_in_the_6ix
They're either getting a bad contract or a replacement level player. They can either have Eriksson, Roussel, Beagle, Motte, MacEwen, Myers, a clearly declining Holtby, or a completely unproven prospect who hasn't been good enough to deserve protection and has taken so long to develop that they're not exempt from the expansion draft. And if any one of those 5 forwards is decent we can still protect them. This does rely on Benning not signing some Dman as expansion exposure fodder in order to protect Myers though, which would be kinda classic Benning.


Seattle would prefer to select an AHL player which doesn't her the cap implications, and then have 6m to spend on UFA, rather team draft a bad contract like Myers or Erikssson.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage