SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Even a stopped watch is right twice a day

Créé par: alwaysnextyear
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 19 oct. 2020
Publié: 21 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I do not take any of Eklund's rumors seriously (I still like the Hockeybuzz site for some of the other team writers), but this is one of his latest and I only post it because I'd love for it to happen for the Canucks.

The rumor is basically Loui being dangled with next year's 1st to every team in the league, with the goal being to clear enough space to sign Hoffman for one year, who's waiting for the Canucks to get some cap cleared. Personally I think Benning will need to add another sweetener in the trade to get it done (Virtanen?).
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
16 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
    To any team
    DET
    1. Eriksson, Loui
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
    2.
    VAN
      Possibly added to sweeten the Eriksson deal, or dealt to any other team for a pick in a separate trade.
      DET
      1. Virtanen, Jake [Droits de RFA]
      Rachats de contrats
      Frais appliqués
      Enfoui
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2021
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      2022
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      2023
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2381 500 000 $79 731 878 $1 700 000 $4 750 000 $1 768 122 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      C, AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
      C
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
      AG, AD
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      950 000 $950 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      825 000 $825 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      DD
      NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DG
      UFA - 1
      900 000 $900 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
      AD, C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      21 oct. 2020 à 13 h 3
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2017
      Messages: 3,205
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,077
      But we need another defenseman, not a winger. Myers is not a good fit with Hughes.
      21 oct. 2020 à 13 h 34
      #2
      Démarrer sujet
      alwaysnextyear
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 5,523
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,566
      Quoting: Canucks33
      But we need another defenseman, not a winger. Myers is not a good fit with Hughes.


      Both Myers and Hughes actually had pretty good possession stats when playing as a pair last year, and Myers is probably better utilized with more OZ starts as he's not a real shutdown Dman. And ideally the team would get another Dman and top 6 forward, but there just isn't cap room for both. IMO the bigger need is a top 6 winger after they acquired Schmidt.
      21 oct. 2020 à 13 h 50
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2017
      Messages: 3,205
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,077
      Quoting: alwaysnextyear
      Both Myers and Hughes actually had pretty good possession stats when playing as a pair last year, and Myers is probably better utilized with more OZ starts as he's not a real shutdown Dman. And ideally the team would get another Dman and top 6 forward, but there just isn't cap room for both. IMO the bigger need is a top 6 winger after they acquired Schmidt.


      Myers' decision making is not good enough to play with Hughes. Just because Myers is better at offense than defense doesn't mean he'll be a fit with him. He makes too many mistakes and when Hughes is making plays, they'll get caught too often. That means they'll either be bad defensively or Hughes will have to be restricted to cover Myers' mistakes.

      I disagree about needing a top-6 winger more than a defenseman. It would be nice, but we have essentially the same forward core as last year. Toffoli was only here for 10 games, so he wasn't really part of the team. Demoting Eriksson and inserting MacEwan full time is an upgrade already. Re-sign Leivo as a stop gap forward and the forward core is improved from last year without any big moves. That leaves the limited resources we have left to be allocated to getting a defenseman.
      alwaysnextyear a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage