SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trading Monahan to Columbus

Créé par: JamesJohnson
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 21 oct. 2020
Publié: 21 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
1700 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Bjorkstrand, Oliver
  2. Savard, David (1 000 000 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Kylington, Oliver [Droits de RFA]
  2. Monahan, Sean
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $65 664 166 $0 $457 500 $15 835 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
62 500 $62 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 oct. 2020 à 0 h 26
#1
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
You’re getting fleeced tbh.
21 oct. 2020 à 0 h 27
#2
Beanmachine
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,483
Mentions "j'aime": 497
And when you have to reup both of them as well as Dube, Bennett and Valimaki next year where is the $$ coming from?
21 oct. 2020 à 0 h 33
#3
AM19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 398
Mentions "j'aime": 178
Normally would consider but with Domi no longer need a center. Plus we're really big on Bjorkstrand. He's a lock for the RW1 spot. But it's a fair trade otherwise.
JamesJohnson a aimé ceci.
21 oct. 2020 à 0 h 35
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,916
Mentions "j'aime": 19,293
If your reason for moving Monahan is he is not a legitimate 1C then you are going to be greatly disappointed by Lindholm as he is not a better 1C (arguably worse). The downgrade from Monahan to Bjorkstrand here is definitely not at all worth it and I'm a fan of Bjorkstrand.
21 oct. 2020 à 0 h 40
#5
slomo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 747
Mentions "j'aime": 89
Quoting: InTreWeTrust
And when you have to reup both of them as well as Dube, Bennett and Valimaki next year where is the $$ coming from?


Lucic gets bought out, Ryan is not resigned and Gaudreau will be traded for prospects and draft picks. That's about $15 mil freed up rather quickly and replaced with the likes of more players like Nordstrom, Leivo to fill in the bottom 6 lines.
21 oct. 2020 à 0 h 48
#6
Jets Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 952
Mentions "j'aime": 290
Quoting: slomo
Lucic gets bought out, Ryan is not resigned and Gaudreau will be traded for prospects and draft picks. That's about $15 mil freed up rather quickly and replaced with the likes of more players like Nordstrom, Leivo to fill in the bottom 6 lines.


You’d probably want a cheaper backup too, so there’s another 1.5Mish freed up. Could also let Savard walk since you have Andersson and Tanev on the right
21 oct. 2020 à 1 h 8
#7
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,155
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
If your reason for moving Monahan is he is not a legitimate 1C then you are going to be greatly disappointed by Lindholm as he is not a better 1C (arguably worse). The downgrade from Monahan to Bjorkstrand here is definitely not at all worth it and I'm a fan of Bjorkstrand.


I’m no Monahan fan, not as a 1c anyway but wtf is this trade. This is horrible.

I like lindholm better at C than Monahan but you are right. It’s not going to cut it.

If there were some way to Johnny and mony for a true 1c it would be worth it. But it would have to be eichel or Point type of impact player. But teams don’t move players like that.
Ledge_And_Dairy a aimé ceci.
21 oct. 2020 à 1 h 20
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,916
Mentions "j'aime": 19,293
Quoting: Jamiepo
I’m no Monahan fan, not as a 1c anyway but wtf is this trade. This is horrible.

I like lindholm better at C than Monahan but you are right. It’s not going to cut it.

If there were some way to Johnny and mony for a true 1c it would be worth it. But it would have to be eichel or Point type of impact player. But teams don’t move players like that.


Well if Toews is pissed enough he might waive I would totally trade for him but not either of Monahan or Gaudreau (doubt they would have much interest in either anyways).
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
21 oct. 2020 à 1 h 23
#9
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,155
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Well if Toews is pissed enough he might waive I would totally trade for him but not either of Monahan or Gaudreau (doubt they would have much interest in either anyways).


I agree, but flames wouldn’t want to give up the young prospects it would take. The picks they could deal but they just don’t have enough in the pipe right now.
21 oct. 2020 à 1 h 30
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,916
Mentions "j'aime": 19,293
Quoting: Jamiepo
I agree, but flames wouldn’t want to give up the young prospects it would take. The picks they could deal but they just don’t have enough in the pipe right now.


Maybe, Zary and the defense are untouchable but I think with the emergence of Dube and Mangiapane, Zavgorodny and Pelletier are totally tradeable assets. Also if you win the cup it doesn't matter what you gave up to get there. Look at Tampa, they traded the equivalent of 3 1sts at the TDL for Coleman and Goodrow. I bet if you ask any bolts fan (myself included) they would still 100% do those trades since they won
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
21 oct. 2020 à 1 h 34
#11
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,155
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Maybe, Zary and the defense are untouchable but I think with the emergence of Dube and Mangiapane, Zavgorodny and Pelletier are totally tradeable assets. Also if you win the cup it doesn't matter what you gave up to get there. Look at Tampa, they traded the equivalent of 3 1sts at the TDL for Coleman and Goodrow. I bet if you ask any bolts fan (myself included) they would still 100% do those trades since they won


Yup, I saw your agm. It certainly makes sense. For both teams actually. But only in a vacuum. You don’t just move a guy like toews after everything he has done for your organization.
21 oct. 2020 à 2 h 14
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,851
Mentions "j'aime": 6,441
Fair value- sure
Of interest to Columbus- I’d say not really
Is it going to happen- not a chance.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage