SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is there a Blockbuster Out There

Créé par: SmugTkachuk
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 20 oct. 2020
Publié: 20 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Leaves Giordano, Backlund and Tanev exposed to Seattle which moves a big cap piece hopefully.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
64 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Myers, Philippe [Droits de RFA]
  2. Patrick, Nolan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
PHI
  1. Gaudreau, Johnny
  2. Ryan, Derek
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de PHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $64 975 791 $0 $457 500 $16 524 209 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 oct. 2020 à 11 h 16
#1
Dr.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,485
Mentions "j'aime": 1,413
I think you could get more for johnny. I don't know why you'd be trading one of your top players for patrick, plus philly would be over cap after this i'm pretty sure, they'd need to send some money back.
20 oct. 2020 à 11 h 24
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: ArakinSkywalker
I think you could get more for johnny. I don't know why you'd be trading one of your top players for patrick, plus philly would be over cap after this i'm pretty sure, they'd need to send some money back.


Cap was my only concern really. I definitely think that there is room to improve a Johnny deal but I also think that a lot of teams look at Gaudreau as a piece that they can live without, not going to be a huge market for Johnny with only 2 years remaining on a deal and not efficient in the playoffs. I think that Patrick is a good piece but the trade is really built around a young right shot D that exposes Tanev and Giordano in the expansion draft which hopefully opens up a world of cap for Calgary next off season with a lot of good UFA's on the market next season. Tkachuk and MAngiapane will also be looking for raises
20 oct. 2020 à 11 h 26
#3
Jaromir_Jagr_the_leg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,859
Mentions "j'aime": 787
Don’t u have to protect gio?
20 oct. 2020 à 11 h 32
#4
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,157
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: ArakinSkywalker
I think you could get more for johnny. I don't know why you'd be trading one of your top players for patrick, plus philly would be over cap after this i'm pretty sure, they'd need to send some money back.


Any trade that returns Phil Myers is a big win for Calgary. Dont think Philly trades him tho
20 oct. 2020 à 11 h 32
#5
Dr.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,485
Mentions "j'aime": 1,413
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Cap was my only concern really. I definitely think that there is room to improve a Johnny deal but I also think that a lot of teams look at Gaudreau as a piece that they can live without, not going to be a huge market for Johnny with only 2 years remaining on a deal and not efficient in the playoffs. I think that Patrick is a good piece but the trade is really built around a young right shot D that exposes Tanev and Giordano in the expansion draft which hopefully opens up a world of cap for Calgary next off season with a lot of good UFA's on the market next season. Tkachuk and MAngiapane will also be looking for raises


Yes and no, i think on the right team johnny could produce in playoffs, i also tink a lot of it is monahan not producing. Johnny still gets elite numbers during regular season to get the team a top spot in playoffs which is huge. Hypothetically i think you'd still be able to get Myers in the deal and upgrade patrick to say frost, but i think if you're sending 10 mil over to philly you're going to have to take some cap back.
20 oct. 2020 à 11 h 44
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
I think both teams decline this. Philly for Cap reasons and because they love Myers. Calgary because Patrick is way too much of a risk at this point in time.
DH28Hockey et SmugTkachuk a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2020 à 11 h 47
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,213
Mentions "j'aime": 967
Quoting: Lunatik
I think both teams decline this. Philly for Cap reasons and because they love Myers. Calgary because Patrick is way too much of a risk at this point in time.


This. Calgary could probably get more for that package, and Patrick and Myers are probably the two biggest "more value to us than to anybody else" pieces on the roster
SmugTkachuk a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2020 à 12 h 6
#8
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Nikolay_Zherdev
Don’t u have to protect gio?


No sir NTC vs NMC, Lucic is the only mandatory protect and there is a pretty good idea that he will waive it after the deal to Calgary. Rumours have been all over that the deal doesn't go through if there isn't a hadn shake deal between Treliving and Lucic about waiving for Seattle.
Nikolay_Zherdev a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2020 à 12 h 13
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
No sir NTC vs NMC, Lucic is the only mandatory protect and there is a pretty good idea that he will waive it after the deal to Calgary. Rumours have been all over that the deal doesn't go through if there isn't a hadn shake deal between Treliving and Lucic about waiving for Seattle.
Markstrom is a mandatory protect too, he was given a full NMC.

But you are right on Looch and it was Treliving's own words that made people suspect there is a handshake agreement. The day of or after the trade he was directly asked about the expansion draft implications and said something to the effect of -- I'm not worried (about expansion), but I will not discuss negotiations I've had with players.
20 oct. 2020 à 12 h 14
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 596
Mentions "j'aime": 328
Chuck Fletcher stated publicly that he believes that the Flyers are deeper than almost any team at the wing and would not be adding a winger without making other changes to the position.... so can we finally kill Gaudreau coming to the Flyers because the Flames want to move him and he's from NJ.

Also, Myers is our only RHD. No interest in making our depth chart worse in positions of weakness to add a luxury item at a position of strength.
20 oct. 2020 à 12 h 21
#11
jcambers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 686
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: Nikolay_Zherdev
Don’t u have to protect gio?


Personally, I don't think so... he's great but a big contract, getting old and slowing down. I think GMBT takes a gamble and exposes him but Seattle won't take on a contract that big for such short term.
20 oct. 2020 à 13 h 16
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,213
Mentions "j'aime": 967
Quoting: ALitteral
Chuck Fletcher stated publicly that he believes that the Flyers are deeper than almost any team at the wing and would not be adding a winger without making other changes to the position.... so can we finally kill Gaudreau coming to the Flyers because the Flames want to move him and he's from NJ.

Also, Myers is our only RHD. No interest in making our depth chart worse in positions of weakness to add a luxury item at a position of strength.


Don't think that's quite how he said it, he basically stated he wouldn't add a winger unless it was an obvious upgrade, which Gaudreau would be. I do think however that the more likely avenue would be acquiring him next season, as I think by that point we will look to unload a couple of contracts anyways and one or both of JVR and Jake will be out
20 oct. 2020 à 13 h 20
#13
Jaromir_Jagr_the_leg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,859
Mentions "j'aime": 787
Quoting: jcambers
Personally, I don't think so... he's great but a big contract, getting old and slowing down. I think GMBT takes a gamble and exposes him but Seattle won't take on a contract that big for such short term.


No bc he has ntc
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage