SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Full rebuild with AGM input

Créé par: HatterTParty
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 16 oct. 2020
Publié: 17 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Collected a lot of comments on my recent threads and used them to make some hopefully realistic trades.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
33 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Johnson, Tyler
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TBL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Keith, Duncan
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
3.
CHI
  1. Boychuk, Johnny
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
This would be a late 1st
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
5.
CHI
  1. Beecher, John [Liste de réserve]
  2. DeBrusk, Jake [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
6.
VGK
  1. Subban, Malcolm
  2. Toews, Jonathan (3 000 000 $ retained)
7.
CHI
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de NJD
Logo de BOS
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NJD
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de BOS
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $72 791 185 $1 090 244 $6 832 500 $8 708 815 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
562 500 $562 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 oct. 2020 à 15 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,576
Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
Bruins have Pastrnak as RW1 and just got Kase and Smith. We're set. It's a top6 LW/top4 LHD we need.
17 oct. 2020 à 15 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 840
Mentions "j'aime": 211
You don’t move Patrick Kane for that, no way in hell.
Beetlejuice a aimé ceci.
17 oct. 2020 à 15 h 31
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: bluedemon5
You don’t move Patrick Kane for that, no way in hell.


Quoting: bluedemon5
You don’t move Patrick Kane for that, no way in hell.


I have a feeling hawks fans need to manage our expectations over how much Kane would fetch in a trade. Cuz there’s what he’s realistically gonna get, and what fans believe he will, and those are two very different things. If this was the return, I wouldn’t be the happiest, but it certainly is more realistic.
17 oct. 2020 à 15 h 33
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: bhavikp27
Bruins have Pastrnak as RW1 and just got Kase and Smith. We're set. It's a top6 LW/top4 LHD we need.


I get that and it’s a fair assessment. The only reason I chose the bruins was because they are coming up on their last hurrah in the next 2-3 years. Moreover, a couple Bruin fans on the site have attempted Kane trades as well.
17 oct. 2020 à 15 h 53
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,254
Mentions "j'aime": 728
Bruins will throw in Kase. Wouldn’t want too many RW’s.
17 oct. 2020 à 15 h 58
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Newgod77
Bruins will throw in Kase. Wouldn’t want too many RW’s.


Fair enough, from Boston’s position it’s kind of just going for it another time or two.
17 oct. 2020 à 16 h 12
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,623
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: HatterTParty
I have a feeling hawks fans need to manage our expectations over how much Kane would fetch in a trade. Cuz there’s what he’s realistically gonna get, and what fans believe he will, and those are two very different things. If this was the return, I wouldn’t be the happiest, but it certainly is more realistic.


If this is the return you simply don't trade him
17 oct. 2020 à 16 h 29
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
If this is the return you simply don't trade him


At the end of the day if the hawks ever wanna rebuild and finally move on, it’s gotta be worth it to explore any trade for toews and Kane. Toews especially with how pissed he is at the organization. I do agree Kane should get more, but no team in the league will give up what he’s worth in my opinion.
17 oct. 2020 à 16 h 55
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,623
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: HatterTParty
At the end of the day if the hawks ever wanna rebuild and finally move on, it’s gotta be worth it to explore any trade for toews and Kane. Toews especially with how pissed he is at the organization. I do agree Kane should get more, but no team in the league will give up what he’s worth in my opinion.


I just don't think you trade your two franchise players no matter how old they are. After they brought the team back from the dead they should be hawks as long as they want. Even if it means being bad for a few years longer than necessary.
17 oct. 2020 à 17 h 28
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
I just don't think you trade your two franchise players no matter how old they are. After they brought the team back from the dead they should be hawks as long as they want. Even if it means being bad for a few years longer than necessary.


Well, I am glad you said “as long as they want.” I’m not gonna be surprised if toews is traded in the next year. Cuz at this point, it’s either toews goes or Stan goes. Considering how everything has gone the last 5 years, who do you honestly think goes first?
17 oct. 2020 à 17 h 59
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,280
Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
Kane could get way more back than what you got there
17 oct. 2020 à 18 h 30
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Wadejos123
Kane could get way more back than what you got there


Again, I gotta ask, do we really think between his age, salary, and COVID that someone would pay it? He’s a top five winger in the league still but people would only be paying for five more years of him. In these conditions, it just may not happen. I’d love if it could.
17 oct. 2020 à 19 h 3
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,280
Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
Quoting: HatterTParty
Again, I gotta ask, do we really think between his age, salary, and COVID that someone would pay it? He’s a top five winger in the league still but people would only be paying for five more years of him. In these conditions, it just may not happen. I’d love if it could.


In this post you're getting more for toews than kane though. I get that you're adding value for taking back Flower but I still think Kane is worth a lot more than what you've listed on his own. I have no problem retaining either if it maximizes value.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
18 oct. 2020 à 11 h 9
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,623
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: HatterTParty
Well, I am glad you said “as long as they want.” I’m not gonna be surprised if toews is traded in the next year. Cuz at this point, it’s either toews goes or Stan goes. Considering how everything has gone the last 5 years, who do you honestly think goes first?


I think the toews being pissed off thing is way overblown. And I think bowman should've been fired years ago. Guess we'll just have to wait and see
18 oct. 2020 à 16 h 23
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
I think the toews being pissed off thing is way overblown. And I think bowman should've been fired years ago. Guess we'll just have to wait and see


Couldn’t agree more. I don’t know if toews’ feelings are overblown, but bowman is beyond redemption at this point.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage