SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If Sakic traded for a goalie

Créé par: RichardAvs
Équipe: 2020-21 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 15 oct. 2020
Publié: 15 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Granlund takes the 1 year deal in this situation because there’s still a ton of UFA’s and he could really benefit from playing in Colorado for more money next offseason (from another team).
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 250 000 $
2700 000 $
1700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
  1. Vejdemo, Lukas
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (VGK)
2.
ANA
  1. Byram, Bowen
  2. Grubauer, Philipp
  3. Jost, Tyson [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (COL)
  5. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (COL)
3.
COL
  1. Zboril, Jakub
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de VGK
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $79 043 929 $0 $2 650 000 $2 456 071 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
725 000 $725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 8
#1
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
I don’t think Gibson gets moved any time soon. Unless it’s for a elite power forward
ArakinSkywalker a aimé ceci.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 8
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 1,017
Byram is a nice piece, but Duck fans will want more than that. At least another 1st rounder on top of the package. Not that Gibson is for trade anyways though
ArakinSkywalker a aimé ceci.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 9
#3
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
I don’t think Gibson gets moved any time soon. Unless it’s for a elite power forward


Quoting: NLidstrom
Byram is a nice piece, but Duck fans will want more than that. At least another 1st rounder on top of the package. Not that Gibson is for trade anyways though


Really? Byram is one of the best defence prospect, maybe THE best, in the nhl. I would have thought it was fair.
RichardAvs a aimé ceci.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 11
#4
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
Quoting: Saskleaf
Really? Byram is one of the best defence prospect, maybe THE best, in the nhl. I would have thought it was fair.


Value wise it is yes. But what we need / want no not exactly
Saskleaf et NLidstrom a aimé ceci.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 11
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 12,719
Mentions "j'aime": 17,338
Montreal rejects they don't need the extra cap
BorisBagel a aimé ceci.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 12
#6
Dr.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,500
Mentions "j'aime": 1,434
I would be all for gibson, but i have to agree with the others, i don't think this is enough frown
Stgstg55 a aimé ceci.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 16
#7
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
Quoting: ArakinSkywalker
I would be all for gibson, but i have to agree with the others, i don't think this is enough frown


Quoting: Saskleaf
Really? Byram is one of the best defence prospect, maybe THE best, in the nhl. I would have thought it was fair.


To put in perspective for another team it would be like ( I’m just using Buffalo as an example )

Cozens
Ulmark
Olofsson
2021 1st

Obviously it’s a ton but trading Gibson is basically trading away our entire team
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 18
#8
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
To put in perspective for another team it would be like ( I’m just using Buffalo as an example )

Cozens
Ulmark
Olofsson
2021 1st

Obviously it’s a ton but trading Gibson is basically trading away our entire team


In other words, since no one is going to pay the ridiculous overpay it would take to get Gibson, he's staying in Anaheim.
Stgstg55 a aimé ceci.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 18
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 386
Mentions "j'aime": 62
Quoting: ArakinSkywalker
I would be all for gibson, but i have to agree with the others, i don't think this is enough frown

We have to remember it’s Joe Sakic, he doesn’t lose trades. Byram is the best defenseman prospect in the NHL and he doesn’t have a spot on the Avs current lineup.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 20
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 386
Mentions "j'aime": 62
Quoting: Saskleaf
In other words, since no one is going to pay the ridiculous overpay it would take to get Gibson, he's staying in Anaheim.

Gibson has a sweet deal, but by the time Anaheim is ready to content 2-3 years they’ll want a top line defenseman like Byram to play with Drysdale. Also you can still have Grub in net by then.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 21
#11
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
Quoting: Saskleaf
In other words, since no one is going to pay the ridiculous overpay it would take to get Gibson, he's staying in Anaheim.


Exactly lmao
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 22
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,573
Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
Too much salary going to Boston.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 24
#13
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: RichardAvs
Gibson has a sweet deal, but by the time Anaheim is ready to content 2-3 years they’ll want a top line defenseman like Byram to play with Drysdale. Also you can still have Grub in net by then.


That's what I thought too.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 31
#14
Dr.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,500
Mentions "j'aime": 1,434
Quoting: RichardAvs
We have to remember it’s Joe Sakic, he doesn’t lose trades. Byram is the best defenseman prospect in the NHL and he doesn’t have a spot on the Avs current lineup.


My comment mostly referred to the other parts of the trade, a 5th and 6th do nothing in a trade like this and no one is going out of their way to get jost after the playoff run he just had. If i'm anahiem i'm mostly skeptical about trading a solidified elite goalie for a potential elite d man. I think byram and makar will be a top duo in the nhl in a few years but byram has yet to play a nhl game and wasn't that outstanding in the whl last season. That's why i think anahiem might ant more.
15 oct. 2020 à 12 h 33
#15
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
The NHL meta is having a good goalie tandem with each guy making 3-4mil each, rather than having a stud 7mil + guy playing 65games with a fringe backup behind him.

I dont do that trade. Goalies get hurt, wear and tear, they look elite one year than fall off the next.
Build a really solid defence and it probably makes any goalie behind them look really good (regardless of who is in net).
Also no chance Gibson is available.
17 oct. 2020 à 5 h 54
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3
Mentions "j'aime": 0
I think to get Anaheim to even listen it would be more along the lines of :
2 1st rounders
Grubauer
Byrum or Newhook
Bowers or Kaut or Jost
To get a top 5ish goalie that's young, signed to a team friendly deal plus term is going to hurt in cost.
19 oct. 2020 à 11 h 30
#17
Dirty_dangles_37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 600
Mentions "j'aime": 206
Quoting: AvsDynasty
I think to get Anaheim to even listen it would be more along the lines of :
2 1st rounders
Grubauer
Byrum or Newhook
Bowers or Kaut or Jost

To get a top 5ish goalie that's young, signed to a team friendly deal plus term is going to hurt in cost.


thats a little to much super chief id rather have all that with are current goalie tandam then lose all that for a goalie that could suck for us.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage