SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs

Créé par: TheLeafsSeason
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 14 oct. 2020
Publié: 14 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
B
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
3800 000 $
21 200 000 $
21 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
Transactions
TOR
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 427 283 $0 $0 $72 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Flames still decline
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 15
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,743
Mentions "j'aime": 569
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames still decline


Kerfoot is miles better than Bennett. The Leafs are getting fleeced here
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 16
#3
#LeafsFever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,785
Mentions "j'aime": 932
I like Bennett, but I like him as a LW. He's not a very proven center by any means and I think there are other potential options out there. Also, I cannot see a scenario where Dermott wins a starting job over both Lehtonen and Sandin.
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 17
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: TheLeafsSeason
Kerfoot is miles better than Bennett. The Leafs are getting fleeced here


Ryan is miles better than Kerfoot so Flames don't need a "3C upgrade"

We will happily keep Bennett, our pick and our cap space.
Tkachinla a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 17
#5
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,743
Mentions "j'aime": 569
Quoting: MG1986
I like Bennett, but I like him as a LW. He's not a very proven center by any means and I think there are other potential options out there. Also, I cannot see a scenario where Dermott wins a starting job over both Lehtonen and Sandin.


I mean, we have no idea who Lehtonen really is. He's killing it in the KHL, but the KHL is not the NHL. For all we know, he can be the next Zaitsev
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 17
#6
#LeafsFever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,785
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames still decline


Flames would absolutely never decline that deal. Kerfoot provides secondary scoring and I would is significantly better offensively then Bennett. Sure, Bennett plays a physical game, but that 1 dimension should not be worth everything that Kerfoot brings to the table, who, by the way, is the much better center of the 2. Plus you are getting an economical deal with multiple years of control.
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 19
#7
#LeafsFever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,785
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: TheLeafsSeason
I mean, we have no idea who Lehtonen really is. He's killing it in the KHL, but the KHL is not the NHL. For all we know, he can be the next Zaitsev


My point was there is not just 1 LD to leap-frog, it's two of them. I think Dermott is gone, it's just a matter of finding the right deal.
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 20
#8
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,743
Mentions "j'aime": 569
Quoting: MG1986
My point was there is not just 1 LD to leap-frog, it's two of them. I think Dermott is gone, it's just a matter of finding the right deal.


I personally don't think Dermott is gone. If Dermott was gone, Dubas would have traded him, along side Johnsson, for Weegar. This offer was the asking price from the Panthers standpoint, Dubas declined.
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 21
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: MG1986
Flames would absolutely never decline that deal. Kerfoot provides secondary scoring and I would is significantly better offensively then Bennett. Sure, Bennett plays a physical game, but that 1 dimension should not be worth everything that Kerfoot brings to the table, who, by the way, is the much better center of the 2. Plus you are getting an economical deal with multiple years of control.


Flames would absolutely 100% decline that deal, did you not see Bennett these playoffs? He was nearly a ppg. Kerfoot is really mediocre and would be a 4C in Calgary since Ryan is significantly better. Zero interest in arguing this since it has been discussed to death in 400 other thread.
Flames. Are. Not. Interested. In. Trading. Bennett. Stop. Asking.
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 23
#10
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,743
Mentions "j'aime": 569
Quoting: MG1986
Flames would absolutely never decline that deal. Kerfoot provides secondary scoring and I would is significantly better offensively then Bennett. Sure, Bennett plays a physical game, but that 1 dimension should not be worth everything that Kerfoot brings to the table, who, by the way, is the much better center of the 2. Plus you are getting an economical deal with multiple years of control.


From the Leafs side, if we didn't need anymore upgrades, I would have kept Kerfoot. Trading Kerfoot for Bennett gives us another physical presence and provides Brodie a familiar face in the locker room. We can also re-sign Dermott and Mikheyev to their expected value of $1.2 million, acquire Hamonic, and still upgrade the bottom 6 by adding in Martin.
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 24
#11
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,743
Mentions "j'aime": 569
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames would absolutely 100% decline that deal, did you not see Bennett these playoffs? He was nearly a ppg. Kerfoot is really mediocre and would be a 4C in Calgary since Ryan is significantly better. Zero interest in arguing this since it has been discussed to death in 400 other thread.
Flames. Are. Not. Interested. In. Trading. Bennett. Stop. Asking.


You clearly haven't watched Kerfoot's game then if you think he is a 4C. The Leafs are downgrading and are getting fleeced
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 25
#12
#LeafsFever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,785
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: TheLeafsSeason
From the Leafs side, if we didn't need anymore upgrades, I would have kept Kerfoot. Trading Kerfoot for Bennett gives us another physical presence and provides Brodie a familiar face in the locker room. We can also re-sign Dermott and Mikheyev to their expected value of $1.2 million, acquire Hamonic, and still upgrade the bottom 6 by adding in Martin.


I understand what you are trying to do, but I do not agree with you, or at least with your AGM.
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 33
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: TheLeafsSeason
You clearly haven't watched Kerfoot's game then if you think he is a 4C. The Leafs are downgrading and are getting fleeced


I am saying we don't want or need him, you keep him. He's overpaid in this flat cap and really doesn't do much. Flames have 3-4 centers who are all definitely better than Kerfoot. Monahan, Backlund, Lindholm, Ryan. Bennett was given the center role and moved away from Jankowski these playoffs for the first time in years and played excellent. We have no interest in trading him right now since he is low risk high reward if he picks up where he left off.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage