SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

picks prospects and contracts

Créé par: HatterTParty
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 13 oct. 2020
Publié: 14 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I know this is incredibly extreme, but if we’re already phoning next season, why not? Also, Johnson would be selected by His home state in the expansion draft.
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
2.
CHI
  1. Johnson, Tyler
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TBL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
3.
CHI
  1. Smith, Brendan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
4.
CHI
  1. Poulin, Samuel
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
5.
CHI
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Smith, Zack (500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Anyone who needs a penalty killer for a year.
6.
CHI
  1. Bozak, Tyler
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (STL)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (STL)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de STL
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de BUF
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de STL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $68 652 852 $1 090 244 $5 982 500 $12 847 148 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
562 500 $562 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 oct. 2020 à 11 h 52
#1
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
The only way Seattle takes on that contract is with the 2nd from the Tampa trade. We would need to discuss this with them prior to making the trade.


I also want to say that the worst trade for us is the PIT trade. No reason to trade him, especially if he contract rumor is true, playing him ~3 million to be a 3rd C for two years is a great deal, and he fits our rebuild timeline.
14 oct. 2020 à 11 h 56
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
The only way Seattle takes on that contract is with the 2nd from the Tampa trade. We would need to discuss this with them prior to making the trade.


I’d be fine with that. Even if we held onto him, we have room for him and he’s serviceable. But honestly, I don’t think Johnson should have to cost a 2nd. A 3rd maybe, but the guy can still play. Not to mention his buyout isn’t the worst for a guy on 5 mil.
Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2020 à 11 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,247
Mentions "j'aime": 262
pit says take those seconds out and you add something..... plus we don't have the cap space anyway
14 oct. 2020 à 11 h 57
#4
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: HatterTParty
I’d be fine with that. Even if we held onto him, we have room for him and he’s serviceable. But honestly, I don’t think Johnson should have to cost a 2nd. A 3rd maybe, but the guy can still play. Not to mention his buyout isn’t the worst for a guy on 5 mil.


Still really don't get the Strome trade.
14 oct. 2020 à 11 h 59
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
The only way Seattle takes on that contract is with the 2nd from the Tampa trade. We would need to discuss this with them prior to making the trade.


I also want to say that the worst trade for us is the PIT trade. No reason to trade him, especially if he contract rumor is true, playing him ~3 million to be a 3rd C for two years is a great deal, and he fits our rebuild timeline.


Sorry, just read your addition to that comment.

I disagree honestly. I don’t care if he’s making 3 mil or less, there’s really no place left in the team for strome. Signing Wallmark makes him expendable. I know that’s saying a lot considering strome’s scoring, but he doesn’t do anything else. Wallmark will never play wing, and strome CANNOT play wing. Mix that with Kampf being the perfect 4C, where does strome go? He can bring in good return. That Pittsburgh return is not bad.
14 oct. 2020 à 12 h 1
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: fil97
pit says take those seconds out and you add something..... plus we don't have the cap space anyway


You guys don’t have 3 mil? Jesus....

Also, I love seeing how Pitt fans react to this as opposed to hawks fans 🤣
RicXX a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2020 à 12 h 10
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,247
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: HatterTParty
You guys don’t have 3 mil? Jesus....

Also, I love seeing how Pitt fans react to this as opposed to hawks fans 🤣


no we dont haha we would need to move somebody like riikola... we could make it work but our priority is a RHD

what do you mean opposed?? is there somebody that thinks he is worth more then this??
14 oct. 2020 à 12 h 13
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: fil97
no we dont haha we would need to move somebody like riikola... we could make it work but our priority is a RHD

what do you mean opposed?? is there somebody that thinks he is worth more then this??


There are hawks fans who not only think he’s worth this, but think the hawks would lose this trade.
14 oct. 2020 à 13 h 25
#9
All-Team Pylon
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,625
Mentions "j'aime": 515
Strome not worth even close to two seconds and a first
14 oct. 2020 à 18 h 37
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,247
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: HatterTParty
There are hawks fans who not only think he’s worth this, but think the hawks would lose this trade.


oh boy.... thats just insane hahah

I don't think any team would be willing to give them two 2nds and a mid 1st for him
14 oct. 2020 à 19 h 51
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: fil97
oh boy.... thats just insane hahah

I don't think any team would be willing to give them two 2nds and a mid 1st for him


It’s kind of two schools of thought. I totally agree 2 2nds is a little extreme and I shoulda just put the one in. But the biggest disagreement would be around strome vs poulin. One side will strome is young and has already shown himself as a proven NHLer while poulin hasn’t done a thing. Then there’s the other side (like me honestly) who loves growing from within and sees poulin, while still not a sure thing, as being right on track to make a difference for the pens.

I will honestly say though, I think the pens are set at wing and they could use a 2C/3C in strome while the hawks could definitely use a guy like poulin.
RicXX et fil97 a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2020 à 22 h 26
#12
Blackhawks Faithful
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 646
Mentions "j'aime": 411
Like the idea of it, except the Strome trade, he needs to stay, but I feel Stan will trade him to piss off DeBrincat...

Zack Smith is a no go anywhere but LTIR, he is still recovering from back surgery hence why no buyout.
14 oct. 2020 à 22 h 30
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: RicXX
Like the idea of it, except the Strome trade, he needs to stay, but I feel Stan will trade him to piss off DeBrincat...

Zack Smith is a no go anywhere but LTIR, he is still recovering from back surgery hence why no buyout.


Strome very well could be a waste of a trade, I admit that. The only problem is what I outlined in an earlier response. Wallmark is gonna be 3C, or at least should be, and kampf is a great 4C. That leaves strome kinda out of the equation, as he doesn’t play wing with any sort of competence. That is, unless the hawks would actually choose to put Dach on the wing, which I’m actually a fan of.
RicXX a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2020 à 22 h 32
#14
Blackhawks Faithful
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 646
Mentions "j'aime": 411
Quoting: HatterTParty
Strome very well could be a waste of a trade, I admit that. The only problem is what I outlined in an earlier response. Wallmark is gonna be 3C, or at least should be, and kampf is a great 4C. That leaves strome kinda out of the equation, as he doesn’t play wing with any sort of competence. That is, unless the hawks would actually choose to put Dach on the wing, which I’m actually a fan of.


I like the idea of Dach on the wing! Solves the too many Centers. Maybe try Toews-Dach-Kane?
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2020 à 22 h 36
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: RicXX
I like the idea of Dach on the wing! Solves the too many Centers. Maybe try Toews-Dach-Kane?


I won’t lie, all hawks fans know I’m not a big fan of Dach, but if he were used on wing I’d love it. Dach could be exactly like another mark stone with his defensive skills and hopefully get 60ish points a year at his peak.

Toews Dach Kane might be alittle too loaded, especially since kubalik and toews are phenomenal together.
RicXX a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2020 à 22 h 38
#16
Blackhawks Faithful
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 646
Mentions "j'aime": 411
I just changed my line up a bit... I kinda like it, if you see the third line that used to be a first line some years ago on another team that brought home another cup...
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2020 à 22 h 44
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: RicXX
I just changed my line up a bit... I kinda like it, if you see the third line that used to be a first line some years ago on another team that brought home another cup...


Not bad, definitely get a hossa vibe on that first line. I don’t think Dach is ever gonna be a goal scorer in the vein of hossa, but he would be wicked effective.
RicXX a aimé ceci.
15 oct. 2020 à 5 h 18
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,247
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: HatterTParty
It’s kind of two schools of thought. I totally agree 2 2nds is a little extreme and I shoulda just put the one in. But the biggest disagreement would be around strome vs poulin. One side will strome is young and has already shown himself as a proven NHLer while poulin hasn’t done a thing. Then there’s the other side (like me honestly) who loves growing from within and sees poulin, while still not a sure thing, as being right on track to make a difference for the pens.

I will honestly say though, I think the pens are set at wing and they could use a 2C/3C in strome while the hawks could definitely use a guy like poulin.


i agree with you... but if i have to be completely honest you hope to find a better talent then strome from a 1st round pick... it's obviously not easy, busts are frequent (i.e. maata, pouliot...) but i really hope poulin can become a much better player and the fact that he didn't do anything yet means also that we can have more hope on him
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage